Machine Learning · head to head
BigQuery ML vs Glassbox
The short version
- Only BigQuery ML has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: BigQuery ML not available in BigQuery's Standard edition, so the cheapest tier cannot use it; Glassbox no fixed pricing tiers published; custom quotes required based on package, data retention, and session volume
- They diverge on capability: BigQuery ML covers SQL-based ML, Glassbox covers Session Replay.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which BigQuery ML and Glassbox actually diverge.
| Attribute | BigQuery ML | Glassbox |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | usage-based | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Mobile, Hybrid |
| Category | Machine Learning | Business Intelligence |
| Founded | 2008 | 2010 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in BigQuery ML
- SQL-based ML
- AutoML Tables
- Model export
- Prediction functions
- Feature preprocessing
- BigQuery
- Vertex AI
- TensorFlow
Only in Glassbox
- Session Replay
- Struggle Detection
- Journey Mapping
- AI Insights
- Voice of Customer
- Adobe Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Salesforce
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
BigQuery ML
- Training models in SQL without exporting datanot Glassbox
- Linear and logistic regression on warehouse datanot Glassbox
- K-means clustering and matrix factorisation for recommendationsnot Glassbox
- Time series forecasting with ARIMA_PLUSnot Glassbox
- Running imported ONNX, TensorFlow or XGBoost models against BigQuery datanot Glassbox
Glassbox
- User experience analysisnot BigQuery ML
- Bug reproductionnot BigQuery ML
- Conversion optimizationnot BigQuery ML
- Customer journey mappingnot BigQuery ML
- Usability testingnot BigQuery ML
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
BigQuery ML
- Not available in BigQuery's Standard edition, so the cheapest tier cannot use it
- Billed through BigQuery compute and storage rather than as its own product, so training cost tracks data scanned
- Remote models incur extra Agent Platform charges on top
- Externally trained model types such as boosted trees and AutoML run through Agent Platform rather than inside BigQuery
Glassbox
- No fixed pricing tiers published; custom quotes required based on package, data retention, and session volume
Pricing, plan by plan
BigQuery ML
Free- Free TierFree
- 10GB storage
- 1TB queries
- On-Demand$5/TB
- Pay per TB scanned
- ML training costs
Glassbox
On request- CustomFree
- Full Platform
- Mobile Analytics
- Enterprise Support
Which should you pick?
Choose BigQuery ML if
- You need sql-based ml.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want automl tables.
Choose Glassbox if
- You need session replay.
- You work on Web, Mobile, Hybrid.
- You also want struggle detection.
Questions people ask
- Is BigQuery ML or Glassbox better?
- Neither clearly leads. BigQuery ML starts at Free and Glassbox at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, BigQuery ML or Glassbox?
- BigQuery ML has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for BigQuery ML and On request for Glassbox.
- Does BigQuery ML or Glassbox run on more platforms?
- BigQuery ML runs on Web. Glassbox runs on Web, Mobile, Hybrid.
- Can I use BigQuery ML for free?
- Yes. BigQuery ML has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Glassbox starts at On request.
- What is BigQuery ML best used for?
- BigQuery ML is most often used for training models in sql without exporting data, linear and logistic regression on warehouse data, k-means clustering and matrix factorisation for recommendations, time series forecasting with arima_plus. Of those, training models in sql without exporting data and linear and logistic regression on warehouse data are not what Glassbox is typically brought in for.
- What can BigQuery ML do that Glassbox cannot?
- BigQuery ML covers SQL-based ML, AutoML Tables, Model export, Prediction functions. Glassbox covers Session Replay, Struggle Detection, Journey Mapping, AI Insights. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
BigQuery ML: How much does Google Cloud BigQuery ML cost?
BigQuery ML pricing is not specified separately on Google Cloud's pricing page. It follows the same pay-as-you-go model as BigQuery, charging per terabyte of data scanned during analysis. Customers receive $300 in free credits and can use 20+ products free up to monthly limits.
SourceGlassbox: How much does Glassbox cost?
Glassbox uses custom pricing based on three factors: the selected package (Production Operation, Marketing/Business, or Product), data retention period, and session volume. The vendor encourages contacting sales to build customized packages.
SourceBigQuery ML: Does Google Cloud offer a free trial?
Yes, new customers get $300 in free credits and all customers can use 20+ Google Cloud products free up to their monthly usage limits.
SourceGlassbox: Does Glassbox offer add-ons for specific industries?
Yes, Glassbox offers specialized add-on solutions including fraud prevention, accessibility features, and call center solutions tailored for financial organizations.
SourceRelated pages
More on BigQuery ML
Other head to heads
- BigQuery ML vs AWS SageMaker
- BigQuery ML vs Azure Machine Learning
- BigQuery ML vs DataRobot
- BigQuery ML vs Databricks
- BigQuery ML vs SAS
- BigQuery ML vs scikit-learn
- BigQuery ML vs Snowflake
- BigQuery ML vs Weka
- BigQuery ML vs MATLAB
- BigQuery ML vs Palantir Foundry
- BigQuery ML vs Apache Spark MLlib
- BigQuery ML vs Hugging Face
- BigQuery ML vs Kubeflow
- BigQuery ML vs Langwatch
- BigQuery ML vs LlamaIndex
- BigQuery ML vs Milvus
- BigQuery ML vs Neptune.ai
- BigQuery ML vs Amazon Redshift ML
- BigQuery ML vs MicroStrategy
- BigQuery ML vs Sisense
- BigQuery ML vs Power BI
- BigQuery ML vs Amazon QuickSight
- BigQuery ML vs Quantum Metric
- BigQuery ML vs Dundas BI
- BigQuery ML vs Anaplan
- BigQuery ML vs GoodData
- BigQuery ML vs IBM Cognos Analytics
- BigQuery ML vs Oracle Analytics Cloud
- BigQuery ML vs SAP BusinessObjects
- BigQuery ML vs ChartMogul
- BigQuery ML vs NetBase Quid
- BigQuery ML vs Phocas
- BigQuery ML vs Preset
- BigQuery ML vs ProfitWell
- BigQuery ML vs Quid
- Glassbox vs AWS SageMaker
- Glassbox vs Azure Machine Learning
- Glassbox vs DataRobot
- Glassbox vs Databricks
- Glassbox vs SAS
- Glassbox vs scikit-learn
- Glassbox vs Snowflake
- Glassbox vs Weka
- Glassbox vs MATLAB
- Glassbox vs Palantir Foundry
- Glassbox vs Apache Spark MLlib
- Glassbox vs Hugging Face
- Glassbox vs Kubeflow
- Glassbox vs Langwatch
- Glassbox vs LlamaIndex
- Glassbox vs Milvus
- Glassbox vs Neptune.ai
- Glassbox vs Amazon Redshift ML
- Glassbox vs MicroStrategy
- Glassbox vs Sisense
- Glassbox vs Power BI
- Glassbox vs Amazon QuickSight
- Glassbox vs Quantum Metric
- Glassbox vs Dundas BI
- Glassbox vs Anaplan
- Glassbox vs GoodData
- Glassbox vs IBM Cognos Analytics
- Glassbox vs Oracle Analytics Cloud
- Glassbox vs SAP BusinessObjects
- Glassbox vs ChartMogul
- Glassbox vs NetBase Quid
- Glassbox vs Phocas
- Glassbox vs Preset
- Glassbox vs ProfitWell
- Glassbox vs Quid


