Machine Learning · head to head
BigQuery ML vs Milvus

Milvus
Machine Learning
Open-source vector database for scalable similarity search
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: BigQuery ML not available in BigQuery's Standard edition, so the cheapest tier cannot use it; Milvus vector dimensions are capped at 32,768
- They diverge on capability: BigQuery ML covers SQL-based ML, Milvus covers Billion-scale vectors.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which BigQuery ML and Milvus actually diverge.
| Attribute | BigQuery ML | Milvus |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | freemium |
| Platforms | Web | Linux, Mac, Windows, Web |
| Founded | 2008 | 2017 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Machine Learning).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in BigQuery ML
- SQL-based ML
- AutoML Tables
- Model export
- Prediction functions
- Feature preprocessing
- BigQuery
- Vertex AI
- Cloud Storage
Only in Milvus
- Billion-scale vectors
- Multiple index types
- GPU acceleration
- Hybrid search
- Data partitioning
- PyTorch
- Hugging Face
- LangChain
Both cover
- TensorFlow
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
BigQuery ML
- Training models in SQL without exporting datanot Milvus
- Linear and logistic regression on warehouse datanot Milvus
- K-means clustering and matrix factorisation for recommendationsnot Milvus
- Time series forecasting with ARIMA_PLUSnot Milvus
- Running imported ONNX, TensorFlow or XGBoost models against BigQuery datanot Milvus
Milvus
- Self hosting a vector database for semantic searchnot BigQuery ML
- Storing and querying embeddings for retrieval augmented generationnot BigQuery ML
- Similarity search over images, audio or text at scalenot BigQuery ML
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
BigQuery ML
- Not available in BigQuery's Standard edition, so the cheapest tier cannot use it
- Billed through BigQuery compute and storage rather than as its own product, so training cost tracks data scanned
- Remote models incur extra Agent Platform charges on top
- Externally trained model types such as boosted trees and AutoML run through Agent Platform rather than inside BigQuery
Milvus
- Vector dimensions are capped at 32,768
- A collection is limited to 64 fields, 1,024 partitions and 16 shards
- Only 1 index is allowed per field
- Search returns at most 16,384 vectors as top-k, and nq is capped at 16,384
- Input and output per RPC is capped at 64 MB for insert, search and query
- VARCHAR values are limited to 65,535 characters
- Data loaded into query nodes cannot exceed 90% of available memory
- An instance supports at most 65,536 collections
Pricing, plan by plan
BigQuery ML
Free- Free TierFree
- 10GB storage
- 1TB queries
- On-Demand$5/TB
- Pay per TB scanned
- ML training costs
Milvus
Free- Open SourceFree
- Full features
- Self-hosted
- Community support
- Zilliz CloudFree
- Managed service
- Free tier available
Which should you pick?
Choose BigQuery ML if
- You need sql-based ml.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want automl tables.
Choose Milvus if
- You need billion-scale vectors.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Mac, Windows, Web.
- You also want multiple index types.
Questions people ask
- Is BigQuery ML or Milvus better?
- Neither clearly leads. BigQuery ML starts at Free and Milvus at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, BigQuery ML or Milvus?
- BigQuery ML starts at Free and Milvus at Free.
- Does BigQuery ML or Milvus run on more platforms?
- BigQuery ML runs on Web. Milvus runs on Linux, Mac, Windows, Web.
- Can I use BigQuery ML for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is BigQuery ML best used for?
- BigQuery ML is most often used for training models in sql without exporting data, linear and logistic regression on warehouse data, k-means clustering and matrix factorisation for recommendations, time series forecasting with arima_plus. Of those, training models in sql without exporting data and linear and logistic regression on warehouse data are not what Milvus is typically brought in for.
- What can BigQuery ML do that Milvus cannot?
- BigQuery ML covers SQL-based ML, AutoML Tables, Model export, Prediction functions. Milvus covers Billion-scale vectors, Multiple index types, GPU acceleration, Hybrid search. Both handle TensorFlow, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
BigQuery ML: How much does Google Cloud BigQuery ML cost?
BigQuery ML pricing is not specified separately on Google Cloud's pricing page. It follows the same pay-as-you-go model as BigQuery, charging per terabyte of data scanned during analysis. Customers receive $300 in free credits and can use 20+ products free up to monthly limits.
SourceMilvus: How much does Milvus cost?
Milvus is open-source and free to use and modify. The self-hosted version has no licensing cost. Zilliz Cloud (the managed SaaS version) does not publish pricing on the website.
SourceBigQuery ML: Does Google Cloud offer a free trial?
Yes, new customers get $300 in free credits and all customers can use 20+ Google Cloud products free up to their monthly usage limits.
SourceMilvus: Is there a free or open-source version of Milvus?
Yes, Milvus is fully open-source and available for free. Milvus Lite is a lightweight option for learning and prototyping that can be installed via pip.
SourceMilvus: Does Milvus offer a managed cloud service?
Yes, Zilliz Cloud is a fully managed Milvus cloud offering with serverless and dedicated cluster options. Pricing must be requested from the company as it is not listed on the public website.
SourceRelated pages
More on BigQuery ML
Other head to heads
- BigQuery ML vs AWS SageMaker
- BigQuery ML vs Azure Machine Learning
- BigQuery ML vs DataRobot
- BigQuery ML vs Databricks
- BigQuery ML vs SAS
- BigQuery ML vs scikit-learn
- BigQuery ML vs Snowflake
- BigQuery ML vs Weka
- BigQuery ML vs MATLAB
- BigQuery ML vs Palantir Foundry
- BigQuery ML vs Apache Spark MLlib
- BigQuery ML vs Hugging Face
- BigQuery ML vs Kubeflow
- BigQuery ML vs Langwatch
- BigQuery ML vs LlamaIndex
- BigQuery ML vs Neptune.ai
- BigQuery ML vs Amazon Redshift ML
- BigQuery ML vs Google Vertex AI
- BigQuery ML vs Pinecone
- BigQuery ML vs Weaviate
- BigQuery ML vs Ray
- BigQuery ML vs Fal AI
- BigQuery ML vs Jupyter
- BigQuery ML vs Keras
- BigQuery ML vs LangChain
- BigQuery ML vs Weights & Biases
- BigQuery ML vs Alteryx
- BigQuery ML vs Anaconda
- BigQuery ML vs Domino Data Lab
- BigQuery ML vs DVC
- BigQuery ML vs Semantic Kernel
- Milvus vs AWS SageMaker
- Milvus vs Azure Machine Learning
- Milvus vs DataRobot
- Milvus vs Databricks
- Milvus vs SAS
- Milvus vs scikit-learn
- Milvus vs Snowflake
- Milvus vs Weka
- Milvus vs MATLAB
- Milvus vs Palantir Foundry
- Milvus vs Apache Spark MLlib
- Milvus vs Hugging Face
- Milvus vs Kubeflow
- Milvus vs Langwatch
- Milvus vs LlamaIndex
- Milvus vs Neptune.ai
- Milvus vs Amazon Redshift ML
- Milvus vs Google Vertex AI
- Milvus vs Pinecone
- Milvus vs Weaviate
- Milvus vs Ray
- Milvus vs Fal AI
- Milvus vs Jupyter
- Milvus vs Keras
- Milvus vs LangChain
- Milvus vs Weights & Biases
- Milvus vs Alteryx
- Milvus vs Anaconda
- Milvus vs Domino Data Lab
- Milvus vs DVC
- Milvus vs Semantic Kernel

