Machine Learning · head to head
BigQuery ML vs Snowplow

Snowplow
Business Intelligence
Behavioural data pipeline you run in your own cloud, relicensed away from Apache 2.0 in 2024
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only BigQuery ML has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: BigQuery ML not available in BigQuery's Standard edition, so the cheapest tier cannot use it; Snowplow the core pipeline was relicensed from Apache 2.0 on 8 January 2024 to the Snowplow Limited Use Licence Agreement and a Confluent-derived community licence, so organisations that adopted it as permissively licensed software must now review their entitlement, buy a licence, or migrate.
- They diverge on capability: BigQuery ML covers SQL-based ML, Snowplow covers Own-cloud deployment.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which BigQuery ML and Snowplow actually diverge.
| Attribute | BigQuery ML | Snowplow |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | usage-based | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Linux, Web, Docker |
| Category | Machine Learning | Business Intelligence |
| Founded | 2008 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in BigQuery ML
- SQL-based ML
- AutoML Tables
- Model export
- Prediction functions
- Feature preprocessing
- BigQuery
- Vertex AI
- TensorFlow
Only in Snowplow
- Own-cloud deployment
- Schema enforcement
- Warehouse loading
- Enrichment
- Trackers
- Streaming output
- Data models
- Snowplow BDP
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
BigQuery ML
- Training models in SQL without exporting datanot Snowplow
- Linear and logistic regression on warehouse datanot Snowplow
- K-means clustering and matrix factorisation for recommendationsnot Snowplow
- Time series forecasting with ARIMA_PLUSnot Snowplow
- Running imported ONNX, TensorFlow or XGBoost models against BigQuery datanot Snowplow
Snowplow
- A data team that needs full-fidelity event data in its own warehouse to build attribution or machine learning features rather than to populate dashboardsnot BigQuery ML
- A regulated business that cannot send behavioural data to a third-party analytics vendor and must keep collection inside its own cloud accountnot BigQuery ML
- A product organisation tired of silently malformed events, which wants a schema contract enforced at collection timenot BigQuery ML
- A company modelling customer behaviour across web, mobile and server events that needs them in one consistent structurenot BigQuery ML
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
BigQuery ML
- Not available in BigQuery's Standard edition, so the cheapest tier cannot use it
- Billed through BigQuery compute and storage rather than as its own product, so training cost tracks data scanned
- Remote models incur extra Agent Platform charges on top
- Externally trained model types such as boosted trees and AutoML run through Agent Platform rather than inside BigQuery
Snowplow
- The core pipeline was relicensed from Apache 2.0 on 8 January 2024 to the Snowplow Limited Use Licence Agreement and a Confluent-derived community licence, so organisations that adopted it as permissively licensed software must now review their entitlement, buy a licence, or migrate.
- You run the pipeline in your own cloud, which means the infrastructure bill, the on-call rota and the upgrade work are yours, and at high event volume that operational cost frequently exceeds what a hosted product would have charged.
- Schema enforcement is the main benefit and the main friction, because every new event requires a schema to be authored and versioned, and teams without discipline around that end up blocked on their own governance process.
- There is no analysis layer: Snowplow delivers data to your warehouse and nothing else, so you still need modelling, a BI tool and the people to run them before anyone sees a number.
- The licence change fractured the community, spawning an Apache 2.0 fork, which means community contributions and third-party tooling are now split across two codebases with uncertain long-term maintenance.
Pricing, plan by plan
BigQuery ML
Free- Free TierFree
- 10GB storage
- 1TB queries
- On-Demand$5/TB
- Pay per TB scanned
- ML training costs
Snowplow
On request- Snowplow BDP$undefined/year
- Commercial pricing quoted by event volume and deployment
- Core pipeline components under the Snowplow Limited Use Licence Agreement, not Apache 2.0
- Trackers, analytics SDKs and Iglu SDKs remain Apache 2.0
Which should you pick?
Choose BigQuery ML if
- You need sql-based ml.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want automl tables.
Choose Snowplow if
- You need own-cloud deployment.
- You work on Linux, Web, Docker.
- You also want schema enforcement.
Questions people ask
- Is BigQuery ML or Snowplow better?
- Neither clearly leads. BigQuery ML starts at Free and Snowplow at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, BigQuery ML or Snowplow?
- BigQuery ML has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for BigQuery ML and On request for Snowplow.
- Does BigQuery ML or Snowplow run on more platforms?
- BigQuery ML runs on Web. Snowplow runs on Linux, Web, Docker.
- Can I use BigQuery ML for free?
- Yes. BigQuery ML has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Snowplow starts at On request.
- What is BigQuery ML best used for?
- BigQuery ML is most often used for training models in sql without exporting data, linear and logistic regression on warehouse data, k-means clustering and matrix factorisation for recommendations, time series forecasting with arima_plus. Of those, training models in sql without exporting data and linear and logistic regression on warehouse data are not what Snowplow is typically brought in for.
- What can BigQuery ML do that Snowplow cannot?
- BigQuery ML covers SQL-based ML, AutoML Tables, Model export, Prediction functions. Snowplow covers Own-cloud deployment, Schema enforcement, Warehouse loading, Enrichment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
BigQuery ML: How much does Google Cloud BigQuery ML cost?
BigQuery ML pricing is not specified separately on Google Cloud's pricing page. It follows the same pay-as-you-go model as BigQuery, charging per terabyte of data scanned during analysis. Customers receive $300 in free credits and can use 20+ products free up to monthly limits.
SourceSnowplow: Is Snowplow still open source?
Not in the permissive sense. On 8 January 2024 the core pipeline moved from Apache 2.0 to the Snowplow Limited Use Licence Agreement, with version 1.1 following in December 2024, alongside a community licence based on the Confluent Community Licence. Trackers and analytics SDKs remain Apache 2.0.
BigQuery ML: Does Google Cloud offer a free trial?
Yes, new customers get $300 in free credits and all customers can use 20+ Google Cloud products free up to their monthly usage limits.
SourceSnowplow: Can we still run it for free in production?
Free use of the relicensed core components is materially constrained and commercial use generally requires an agreement. Read the current licence text against your intended use rather than relying on older documentation.
Snowplow: Is there an Apache 2.0 alternative?
Yes, a fork called OpenSnowcat was created in response to the relicensing and continues under Apache 2.0.
Snowplow: What does Snowplow BDP cost?
Not published. It is quoted by event volume and deployment, and your own cloud infrastructure costs are separate and additional.
Related pages
More on BigQuery ML
Other head to heads
- BigQuery ML vs AWS SageMaker
- BigQuery ML vs Azure Machine Learning
- BigQuery ML vs DataRobot
- BigQuery ML vs Databricks
- BigQuery ML vs SAS
- BigQuery ML vs scikit-learn
- BigQuery ML vs Snowflake
- BigQuery ML vs Weka
- BigQuery ML vs MATLAB
- BigQuery ML vs Palantir Foundry
- BigQuery ML vs Apache Spark MLlib
- BigQuery ML vs Hugging Face
- BigQuery ML vs Kubeflow
- BigQuery ML vs Langwatch
- BigQuery ML vs LlamaIndex
- BigQuery ML vs Milvus
- BigQuery ML vs Neptune.ai
- BigQuery ML vs Amazon Redshift ML
- BigQuery ML vs Anaplan
- BigQuery ML vs Pigment
- BigQuery ML vs DashThis
- BigQuery ML vs Hebbia
- BigQuery ML vs Logi Analytics
- BigQuery ML vs Luzmo
- BigQuery ML vs Preset
- BigQuery ML vs ProfitWell
- BigQuery ML vs Power BI
- BigQuery ML vs Sisense
- BigQuery ML vs Amazon QuickSight
- BigQuery ML vs MicroStrategy
- BigQuery ML vs Yellowfin
- BigQuery ML vs Zebra BI
- BigQuery ML vs Zenlytic
- BigQuery ML vs ThoughtSpot
- BigQuery ML vs Cube
- Snowplow vs AWS SageMaker
- Snowplow vs Azure Machine Learning
- Snowplow vs DataRobot
- Snowplow vs Databricks
- Snowplow vs SAS
- Snowplow vs scikit-learn
- Snowplow vs Snowflake
- Snowplow vs Weka
- Snowplow vs MATLAB
- Snowplow vs Palantir Foundry
- Snowplow vs Apache Spark MLlib
- Snowplow vs Hugging Face
- Snowplow vs Kubeflow
- Snowplow vs Langwatch
- Snowplow vs LlamaIndex
- Snowplow vs Milvus
- Snowplow vs Neptune.ai
- Snowplow vs Amazon Redshift ML
- Snowplow vs Anaplan
- Snowplow vs Pigment
- Snowplow vs DashThis
- Snowplow vs Hebbia
- Snowplow vs Logi Analytics
- Snowplow vs Luzmo
- Snowplow vs Preset
- Snowplow vs ProfitWell
- Snowplow vs Power BI
- Snowplow vs Sisense
- Snowplow vs Amazon QuickSight
- Snowplow vs MicroStrategy
- Snowplow vs Yellowfin
- Snowplow vs Zebra BI
- Snowplow vs Zenlytic
- Snowplow vs ThoughtSpot
- Snowplow vs Cube

