Softwr

Healthcare · head to head

Beckman Coulter DxONE vs Sectra

Beckman Coulter DxONE logo

Beckman Coulter DxONE

Healthcare

Clinical laboratory middleware and informatics from a diagnostics instrument manufacturer

From
On request
Rated
-
Sectra logo

Sectra

Healthcare

Enterprise imaging and PACS from a Swedish vendor that also sells the pathology and cardiology modules on one platform

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Beckman Coulter DxONE the rules and quality control workflows are tuned to Beckman analysers, so laboratories with a mixed Roche, Abbott and Siemens fleet get materially less coverage and typically buy vendor neutral middleware such as Data Innovations Instrument Manager instead.; Sectra sectra does not make scanners, so it cannot cross-subsidise software against modality hardware the way an integrated manufacturer can, and it often loses on headline price in a bundled tender.
  • They diverge on capability: Beckman Coulter DxONE covers DxONE Command Central, Sectra covers Sectra IDS7.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Beckman Coulter DxONE and Sectra actually diverge.

Attributes where Beckman Coulter DxONE and Sectra differ
AttributeBeckman Coulter DxONESectra
PlatformsWeb, WindowsWindows, Web, Cloud, On-premise

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Beckman Coulter DxONE

  • DxONE Command Central
  • DxONE Workflow Manager
  • REMISOL Advance
  • DxONE Inventory Manager
  • Autoverification rules
  • Quality control monitoring
  • LIS interfacing

Only in Sectra

  • Sectra IDS7
  • Digital pathology module
  • Sectra VNA
  • Sectra UniView
  • Image Exchange Portal
  • Sectra Amplifier
  • Breast imaging workflow
  • Sectra One Cloud

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Beckman Coulter DxONE

  • A hospital laboratory standardising on Beckman DxC and DxI analysers that wants autoverification to release the majority of routine chemistry without technologist reviewnot Sectra
  • A low volume rural laboratory that cannot justify on premises middleware servers and needs a cloud hosted rules enginenot Sectra
  • A multi site laboratory network that needs identical autoverification rules applied consistently across every site, which REMISOL Advance is built fornot Sectra
  • A laboratory whose LIS cannot express delta checks or repeat rules and needs that logic to live in middleware insteadnot Sectra

Sectra

  • A hospital group digitising histopathology that does not want a second image archive and a second integration project alongside radiologynot Beckman Coulter DxONE
  • A regional health service replacing several departmental PACS with one archive and one clinician viewernot Beckman Coulter DxONE
  • An imaging provider moving off a capital refresh cycle to a cloud subscription with predictable annual costnot Beckman Coulter DxONE
  • A trust that needs to send and receive studies with neighbouring organisations routinely, where the Image Exchange Portal is already the regional normnot Beckman Coulter DxONE

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Beckman Coulter DxONE

  • The rules and quality control workflows are tuned to Beckman analysers, so laboratories with a mixed Roche, Abbott and Siemens fleet get materially less coverage and typically buy vendor neutral middleware such as Data Innovations Instrument Manager instead.
  • Pricing is bundled into analyser and reagent contracts rather than itemised, so a laboratory cannot compare the informatics cost against a standalone middleware quote and often does not know what it is paying for the software.
  • Because the software is tied to a reagent rental term, the real cost of switching middleware is the remaining years of the reagent commitment, not a software renewal, which locks the laboratory in far longer than a software contract would.
  • DxONE Workflow Manager and REMISOL Advance are different products with different rule engines rather than one product at two sizes, so a laboratory that grows out of Workflow Manager faces a migration and rule rewrite, not an upgrade.
  • Interface builds to the hospital LIS are professional services work quoted per interface, and laboratories consistently underestimate this line, particularly where the LIS is an older Sunquest or SCC installation.

Sectra

  • Sectra does not make scanners, so it cannot cross-subsidise software against modality hardware the way an integrated manufacturer can, and it often loses on headline price in a bundled tender.
  • Diagnostic AI is not built in house; Amplifier orchestrates third party algorithms, so the algorithms themselves need separate licences, separate clinical validation and separate information governance sign off.
  • Sectra One Cloud is priced against a committed annual study volume, and organisations whose imaging activity grows faster than forecast meet overage charges partway through the term.
  • The pathology module assumes you have already solved slide scanning and laboratory workflow, which is the larger and more expensive part of digitising histopathology and is not in Sectra scope.
  • Depth of Epic and Oracle Health integration varies by region and by which modules you buy, so a reference site in Sweden is a weak predictor of what integration will cost a United States buyer.

Pricing, plan by plan

Beckman Coulter DxONE

On request
  • DxONE$undefined/year
    • Quoted as part of an analyser or reagent contract, not as standalone software
    • Priced against instrument fleet size and test volume
    • Multi year reagent rental agreements are the usual commercial vehicle

Sectra

On request
  • Sectra Enterprise Imaging$undefined/year
    • Perpetual licence plus annual maintenance, or Sectra One Cloud subscription
    • Priced on committed annual study volume and modules selected
    • Pathology, cardiology and ophthalmology licensed as separate modules

Which should you pick?

Choose Beckman Coulter DxONE if

  • You need dxone command central.
  • You work on Web, Windows.
  • You also want dxone workflow manager.

Choose Sectra if

  • You need sectra ids7.
  • You work on Windows, Web, Cloud, On-premise.
  • You also want digital pathology module.

Questions people ask

Is Beckman Coulter DxONE or Sectra better?
Neither clearly leads. Beckman Coulter DxONE starts at On request and Sectra at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Beckman Coulter DxONE or Sectra?
Beckman Coulter DxONE starts at On request and Sectra at On request.
Does Beckman Coulter DxONE or Sectra run on more platforms?
Beckman Coulter DxONE runs on Web, Windows. Sectra runs on Windows, Web, Cloud, On-premise.
What is Beckman Coulter DxONE best used for?
Beckman Coulter DxONE is most often used for a hospital laboratory standardising on beckman dxc and dxi analysers that wants autoverification to release the majority of routine chemistry without technologist review, a low volume rural laboratory that cannot justify on premises middleware servers and needs a cloud hosted rules engine, a multi site laboratory network that needs identical autoverification rules applied consistently across every site, which remisol advance is built for, a laboratory whose lis cannot express delta checks or repeat rules and needs that logic to live in middleware instead. Of those, a hospital laboratory standardising on beckman dxc and dxi analysers that wants autoverification to release the majority of routine chemistry without technologist review and a low volume rural laboratory that cannot justify on premises middleware servers and needs a cloud hosted rules engine are not what Sectra is typically brought in for.
What can Beckman Coulter DxONE do that Sectra cannot?
Beckman Coulter DxONE covers DxONE Command Central, DxONE Workflow Manager, REMISOL Advance, DxONE Inventory Manager. Sectra covers Sectra IDS7, Digital pathology module, Sectra VNA, Sectra UniView.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Beckman Coulter DxONE: Can I buy DxONE without buying Beckman analysers?

Not realistically. It is quoted as part of an instrument or reagent agreement and its value is in the depth of integration with Beckman platforms. A laboratory with other analysers should look at vendor neutral middleware.

Sectra: Does Sectra include diagnostic AI?

No. Sectra Amplifier is a marketplace and orchestration layer for third party algorithms, each licensed and validated separately.

Beckman Coulter DxONE: Is DxONE the same as REMISOL Advance?

No. REMISOL Advance is the on premises middleware for higher volume and multi site laboratories. DxONE Workflow Manager is a separate cloud product aimed at low volume laboratories. They are not the same rule engine.

Sectra: Is pathology really on the same platform as radiology?

Yes, the pathology module uses the same archive and workflow engine, which is the main reason buyers digitising histopathology shortlist Sectra.

Beckman Coulter DxONE: Does Beckman publish pricing?

No. Everything is quoted, and the software cost is usually folded into a cost per reportable result on a reagent contract rather than shown as a licence fee.

Sectra: How is Sectra One Cloud priced?

On committed annual study volume plus the modules selected, as a subscription rather than a capital purchase. The vendor does not publish rates.

Beckman Coulter DxONE: Is DxONE a regulated medical device?

The middleware components carry regulatory registrations that vary by product and region. Autoverification of diagnostic results is a regulated function, so confirm the specific clearance for the module and country before deployment.

Sectra: Is Sectra CE marked and FDA cleared?

The diagnostic viewing software carries CE marking under the medical device regulation and FDA 510(k) clearance for diagnostic interpretation, but the exact cleared indications differ per module and per market, so confirm for pathology specifically.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads