Accounting · head to head
Basware vs Checkr

Basware
Accounting
Invoice automation and e-invoicing compliance across a large number of national mandates
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Checkr
Recruitment
Background check platform priced per report, with third-party court fees passed through separately
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Basware the e-invoicing compliance breadth that justifies the price is worthless to a company operating in a single country, where cheaper AP automation tools will do the same work.; Checkr advertised per-report prices exclude court and database access fees, so the real cost per candidate varies by jurisdiction and is higher than the sticker in many counties
- They diverge on capability: Basware covers Invoice capture, Checkr covers Package pricing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Basware and Checkr actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Basware
- Invoice capture
- Matching
- Approval workflow
- E-invoicing compliance
- Supplier network
- Payment execution
- Spend analytics
- ERP integration
Only in Checkr
- Package pricing
- API and dashboard
- Adjudication tools
- Continuous checks
- Candidate portal
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Basware
- A multinational needing compliant electronic invoicing across Italy, Poland, France and Mexico without building each mandate itselfnot Checkr
- A shared service centre processing hundreds of thousands of invoices a year that needs touchless processing rates measured and improvednot Checkr
- A group standardising accounts payable across subsidiaries running different ERP systemsnot Checkr
- A finance function trying to capture early payment discounts that are currently lost to slow approval cyclesnot Checkr
Checkr
- A company running high-volume hourly or gig hiring that needs API-driven checks integrated into an existing ATSnot Basware
- A startup or mid-size employer wanting self-service ordering through a dashboard without a dedicated screening account managernot Basware
- An employer that needs continuous rescreening for driving-related roles rather than a one-time check at hirenot Basware
- A company budgeting screening costs that needs to model court fee variance across the states it hires innot Basware
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Basware
- The e-invoicing compliance breadth that justifies the price is worthless to a company operating in a single country, where cheaper AP automation tools will do the same work.
- Implementation is a substantial integration project involving ERP connectors, supplier onboarding and country-by-country compliance configuration, and it is priced and timed accordingly.
- The user interface is dated next to newer accounts payable products, and approvers outside finance find it unintuitive, which slows the very cycle times the system is bought to improve.
- Supplier onboarding onto the network is the hidden effort: the touchless processing rate depends on how many suppliers actually send electronic invoices, and that is a change management programme, not a software setting.
- Growth by acquisition, including Glantus, has left overlapping analytics capability and integration work still in progress, so buyers should check which components share a data model today.
Checkr
- Advertised per-report prices exclude court and database access fees, so the real cost per candidate varies by jurisdiction and is higher than the sticker in many counties
- Turnaround time depends on how fast individual courts process requests, which Checkr does not control and which can stretch well past the advertised average in rural or backlogged counties
- Add-on checks such as MVR, drug screening and education verification are priced separately, so a full pre-employment package can cost significantly more than the base package price suggests
- Enterprise-scale volume requires a custom Enterprise contract rather than the published per-report rates, so large employers cannot rely on the public pricing page to budget
- Compliance obligations under the FCRA and state ban-the-box laws remain the employer's responsibility even though Checkr provides tooling, so legal review is still needed rather than assumed away by the platform
- Candidate disputes and re-adjudication can add days to a hiring timeline, which matters for roles filled under time pressure
Pricing, plan by plan
Basware
On request- Basware$undefined/year
- Invoice automation, matching and approval
- E-invoicing compliance across national mandates
- Supplier network connectivity
Checkr
On request- Basic$29.99/report
- SSN trace
- Sex offender registry
- Global watchlist
- Essential$59.99/report
- Everything in Basic
- Identity verification
- Unlimited county criminal search
- Complete$94.99/report
- Everything in Essential
- Unlimited state criminal search
- Federal criminal search
Which should you pick?
Choose Basware if
- You need invoice capture.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want matching.
Choose Checkr if
- You need package pricing.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want api and dashboard.
Questions people ask
- Is Basware or Checkr better?
- Neither clearly leads. Basware starts at On request and Checkr at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Basware or Checkr?
- Basware starts at On request and Checkr at On request.
- Does Basware or Checkr run on more platforms?
- Basware runs on Web, iOS, Android. Checkr runs on Web, API.
- What is Basware best used for?
- Basware is most often used for a multinational needing compliant electronic invoicing across italy, poland, france and mexico without building each mandate itself, a shared service centre processing hundreds of thousands of invoices a year that needs touchless processing rates measured and improved, a group standardising accounts payable across subsidiaries running different erp systems, a finance function trying to capture early payment discounts that are currently lost to slow approval cycles. Of those, a multinational needing compliant electronic invoicing across italy, poland, france and mexico without building each mandate itself and a shared service centre processing hundreds of thousands of invoices a year that needs touchless processing rates measured and improved are not what Checkr is typically brought in for.
- What can Basware do that Checkr cannot?
- Basware covers Invoice capture, Matching, Approval workflow, E-invoicing compliance. Checkr covers Package pricing, API and dashboard, Adjudication tools, Continuous checks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Basware: Should we buy Basware if we only operate in one country?
Probably not. Its main advantage is multi-country e-invoicing compliance. In a single jurisdiction, cheaper AP automation gives you the same result.
Checkr: Does the per-report price include court fees?
No. Checkr states that standard third-party court and database access fees are passed through at cost on top of the package price, and these vary by jurisdiction.
Basware: Does it handle mandatory e-invoicing regimes?
Yes, and that is the core reason to choose it. It covers a wide set of national mandates as a service rather than an integration project you run yourself.
Checkr: Can Checkr be used without an ATS integration?
Yes, checks can be ordered manually through the Checkr dashboard as well as programmatically through the API.
Basware: What drives the price?
Invoice volume, number of countries and modules. It is quoted, and implementation with ERP connectors and supplier onboarding is separate.
Checkr: Is pricing different for enterprise volume?
Yes, high-volume employers negotiate an Enterprise contract rather than paying the published per-report rates.
Basware: What determines the return?
The share of invoices arriving electronically. Touchless rates depend on supplier adoption, so budget for a supplier onboarding programme, not just the software.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Basware vs Yooz
- Basware vs Stampli
- Basware vs Tipalti
- Basware vs Ottimate
- Basware vs Medius Expense
- Basware vs Moss
- Basware vs Avalara
- Basware vs Creem
- Basware vs Vertex
- Basware vs Melio
- Basware vs Kodo
- Basware vs SAP Concur
- Basware vs Zoho Books
- Basware vs Zuora
- Basware vs Airwallex
- Basware vs Bench
- Basware vs Zoho Expense
- Basware vs Gem
- Basware vs Glassdoor
- Basware vs SeekOut
- Basware vs hireEZ
- Basware vs Codility
- Basware vs HackerRank
- Basware vs Indeed
- Basware vs Findem
- Basware vs Fetcher
- Basware vs Karat
- Basware vs Recruitee
- Basware vs ZipRecruiter
- Basware vs SAP SuccessFactors
- Basware vs BrightHire
- Basware vs Bullhorn
- Basware vs Comeet
- Basware vs JobAdder
- Checkr vs Yooz
- Checkr vs Stampli
- Checkr vs Tipalti
- Checkr vs Ottimate
- Checkr vs Medius Expense
- Checkr vs Moss
- Checkr vs Avalara
- Checkr vs Creem
- Checkr vs Vertex
- Checkr vs Melio
- Checkr vs Kodo
- Checkr vs SAP Concur
- Checkr vs Zoho Books
- Checkr vs Zuora
- Checkr vs Airwallex
- Checkr vs Bench
- Checkr vs Zoho Expense
- Checkr vs Gem
- Checkr vs Glassdoor
- Checkr vs SeekOut
- Checkr vs hireEZ
- Checkr vs Codility
- Checkr vs HackerRank
- Checkr vs Indeed
- Checkr vs Findem
- Checkr vs Fetcher
- Checkr vs Karat
- Checkr vs Recruitee
- Checkr vs ZipRecruiter
- Checkr vs SAP SuccessFactors
- Checkr vs BrightHire
- Checkr vs Bullhorn
- Checkr vs Comeet
- Checkr vs JobAdder
