Backup · head to head
Kopia vs StorageCraft ShadowProtect

Kopia
Backup
Open source deduplicating backup with client side encryption and a repository on almost any storage
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

StorageCraft ShadowProtect
Backup
Fast and reliable image-based backup
- From
- $15/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Kopia has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Kopia space is only reclaimed when maintenance runs, and in a shared repository full maintenance is owned by one client, so if that machine goes away the repository grows for ever while every backup still reports success.; StorageCraft ShadowProtect host-based backup requires Windows Server 2016 or above on the Hyper-V host, and desktop, client and Pro editions are not supported
- They diverge on capability: Kopia covers Content defined chunking, StorageCraft ShadowProtect covers Image-based backup.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kopia and StorageCraft ShadowProtect actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kopia | StorageCraft ShadowProtect |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $15/month |
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker | Windows, Linux, Web |
| Founded | Unknown | 2003 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Backup).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kopia
- Content defined chunking
- Global deduplication
- Pack blobs
- Client side encryption
- Desktop and command line
- Repository verification
Only in StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- Image-based backup
- VirtualBoot
- Bare metal recovery
- Hardware-independent restore
- Incremental imaging
- ShadowStream replication
- VMware
- Hyper-V
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kopia
- Backing up laptops and workstations to cheap object storage with a desktop interface rather than a cron jobnot StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- Deduplicating backups of several similar machines into one repository so common content is stored oncenot StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- Replacing a chunk based tool whose per object charges made a cheap bucket expensivenot StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- Keeping an encrypted offsite copy where the storage provider must never be able to read the contentsnot StorageCraft ShadowProtect
StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- Backup and disaster recovery (legacy)not Kopia
- System image backup and recoverynot Kopia
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kopia
- Space is only reclaimed when maintenance runs, and in a shared repository full maintenance is owned by one client, so if that machine goes away the repository grows for ever while every backup still reports success.
- The repository format has changed across versions and mixing client versions against one repository is discouraged, so a fleet must be upgraded together rather than machine by machine.
- There is no central orchestration or reporting for many machines, so monitoring a fleet means building your own alerting around exit codes.
- Restoring many small files is slower than the backup was, because content must be reassembled from pack blobs, and this is rarely tested until the day it matters.
- Encryption is client side with no escrow, so a lost repository password means the data is unrecoverable and there is no vendor to appeal to.
StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- Host-based backup requires Windows Server 2016 or above on the Hyper-V host, and desktop, client and Pro editions are not supported
- Host-based and agent-based backup are mutually exclusive installation modes in ShadowProtect 8.0; one machine cannot run both
- Switching from agent-based to host-based requires a clean reinstall rather than an in-place upgrade
- Host-based backups are not compatible with VirtualBoot
- Granular file and folder recovery is not available for host-based backups; the whole backup must be restored to a .vhd or .vhdx first
- Host-based backup jobs do not report status to ShadowControl
- Advanced Verification in ImageManager 8.1 is not supported for host-based backups
- All host-based backups go into a single folder by default, so separating them per VM means creating a separate backup job for each
- Host-based licence keys are generated only through the Arcserve MSP portal
Pricing, plan by plan
Kopia
Free- KopiaFree
- Full functionality, no data limit
- Desktop application included
- Any supported storage back end
StorageCraft ShadowProtect
$15/month- ShadowProtect SPX$15/month
- Image-based backup
- VirtualBoot
- Bare metal recovery
Which should you pick?
Choose Kopia if
- You need content defined chunking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- You also want global deduplication.
Choose StorageCraft ShadowProtect if
- You need image-based backup.
- You work on Windows, Linux, Web.
- You also want virtualboot.
Questions people ask
- Is Kopia or StorageCraft ShadowProtect better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kopia starts at Free and StorageCraft ShadowProtect at $15/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kopia or StorageCraft ShadowProtect?
- Kopia has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Kopia and $15/month for StorageCraft ShadowProtect.
- Does Kopia or StorageCraft ShadowProtect run on more platforms?
- Kopia runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker. StorageCraft ShadowProtect runs on Windows, Linux, Web.
- Can I use Kopia for free?
- Yes. Kopia has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. StorageCraft ShadowProtect starts at $15/month.
- What is Kopia best used for?
- Kopia is most often used for backing up laptops and workstations to cheap object storage with a desktop interface rather than a cron job, deduplicating backups of several similar machines into one repository so common content is stored once, replacing a chunk based tool whose per object charges made a cheap bucket expensive, keeping an encrypted offsite copy where the storage provider must never be able to read the contents. Of those, backing up laptops and workstations to cheap object storage with a desktop interface rather than a cron job and deduplicating backups of several similar machines into one repository so common content is stored once are not what StorageCraft ShadowProtect is typically brought in for.
- What can Kopia do that StorageCraft ShadowProtect cannot?
- Kopia covers Content defined chunking, Global deduplication, Pack blobs, Client side encryption. StorageCraft ShadowProtect covers Image-based backup, VirtualBoot, Bare metal recovery, Hardware-independent restore.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kopia: Is a partly corrupt repository still restorable?
Partly. Deduplication means one damaged pack blob affects every snapshot referencing its contents, but unaffected files still restore. Run verification regularly rather than assuming.
StorageCraft ShadowProtect: How much does StorageCraft ShadowProtect cost?
StorageCraft no longer maintains independent product pricing. The domain redirects to ArcServe, and ArcServe does not publish specific pricing on its homepage. Prospective customers must request a trial, demo, or contact sales.
SourceKopia: How does it compare with restic?
Similar guarantees, with packing that behaves better on per operation billing, a desktop interface, and compression enabled by default.
StorageCraft ShadowProtect: Where can I find StorageCraft pricing?
StorageCraft's website (storagecraft.com) now redirects to ArcServe.com. ArcServe does not publish pricing publicly. To obtain pricing information, users can start a trial, request a demo, or contact ArcServe's sales team.
SourceKopia: Do I need to run maintenance manually?
It is scheduled automatically by default, but you must ensure the client that owns full maintenance keeps running, otherwise deleted snapshots never free space.
Kopia: Can several machines share one repository?
Yes, and that is where deduplication pays off, but they should run compatible versions and only one owns full maintenance.
Related pages
More on StorageCraft ShadowProtect
Other head to heads
- Kopia vs rustic
- Kopia vs Borg Backup
- Kopia vs Duplicacy
- Kopia vs Restic
- Kopia vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Kopia vs UrBackup
- Kopia vs Velero
- Kopia vs HPE StoreOnce
- Kopia vs Portworx Backup
- Kopia vs Trilio
- Kopia vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Kopia vs BDRShield
- Kopia vs CloudCasa
- Kopia vs Cohesity DataProtect
- Kopia vs Datto Backup
- Kopia vs MSP360 Backup
- Kopia vs Backupify
- Kopia vs Spanning Backup
- Kopia vs CloudAlly
- Kopia vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication
- Kopia vs Macrium Reflect
- Kopia vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- Kopia vs Axcient x360Recover
- Kopia vs IBM Storage Protect
- Kopia vs Rewind
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs rustic
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Borg Backup
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Duplicacy
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Restic
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Proxmox Backup Server
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs UrBackup
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Velero
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs HPE StoreOnce
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Portworx Backup
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Trilio
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs BDRShield
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs CloudCasa
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Cohesity DataProtect
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Datto Backup
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs MSP360 Backup
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Backupify
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Spanning Backup
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs CloudAlly
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Macrium Reflect
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Axcient x360Recover
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs IBM Storage Protect
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Rewind
