Software · head to head
AWS API Gateway vs Sanity

AWS API Gateway
Software
Fully managed API gateway service for creating and managing APIs at scale
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Sanity
Software
Headless CMS with real-time collaborative editing and structured content APIs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: AWS API Gateway rEST APIs cost $3.50 per million calls against $1.00 for HTTP APIs, so the older and more featureful type is three and a half times dearer; Sanity free plan limited to 10,000 documents and 100GB assets
- They diverge on capability: AWS API Gateway covers REST APIs, Sanity covers Content API.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which AWS API Gateway and Sanity actually diverge.
| Attribute | AWS API Gateway | Sanity |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | subscription |
| Platforms | AWS Cloud | Web |
| Founded | 2006 | 2011 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in AWS API Gateway
- REST APIs
- WebSocket APIs
- HTTP APIs
- Lambda
- EC2
- DynamoDB
- CloudWatch
- IAM
Only in Sanity
- Content API
- Collaborative editing
- Structured content
- Webhooks
- Third-party services
- GROQ query language
- Cloud support
- JavaScript SDK support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
AWS API Gateway
- Fronting Lambda functions with an HTTP endpointnot Sanity
- REST and HTTP API management with throttling and keysnot Sanity
- WebSocket APIs for real-time clientsnot Sanity
- Private APIs reachable only inside a VPCnot Sanity
- Publishing a developer portal for API consumersnot Sanity
Sanity
- Headless CMS for structured content managementnot AWS API Gateway
- Collaborative content editing with real-time multiplayer supportnot AWS API Gateway
- API-driven content delivery with GROQ query languagenot AWS API Gateway
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
AWS API Gateway
- REST APIs cost $3.50 per million calls against $1.00 for HTTP APIs, so the older and more featureful type is three and a half times dearer
- Data transfer out is charged at $0.09 per GB on top of request pricing
- WebSocket APIs bill connection minutes as well as messages, at $0.25 per million minutes
- Private APIs avoid data transfer charges but incur AWS PrivateLink costs instead
- The developer portal is $125 a month, with additional portal products at $12.50 each
- The free tier lasts 12 months rather than being ongoing
Sanity
- Free plan limited to 10,000 documents and 100GB assets
- Free plan supports only public datasets
- Growth plan capped at 50 seats maximum
- Private datasets, scheduled drafts, and comments/tasks require paid plans
- Annual billing unavailable for Growth plan; Enterprise-only
Pricing, plan by plan
AWS API Gateway
Free- Free TierFree
- 1M requests per month
- Basic API management
- Pay-as-you-go$3.5/per 1M requests
- Unlimited requests
- HTTP APIs
- REST APIs
Sanity
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Sanity review.
Which should you pick?
Choose AWS API Gateway if
- You need rest apis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS Cloud.
- You also want websocket apis.
Choose Sanity if
- You need content api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want collaborative editing.
Questions people ask
- Is AWS API Gateway or Sanity better?
- Neither clearly leads. AWS API Gateway starts at Free and Sanity at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, AWS API Gateway or Sanity?
- AWS API Gateway starts at Free and Sanity at Free.
- Does AWS API Gateway or Sanity run on more platforms?
- AWS API Gateway runs on AWS Cloud. Sanity runs on Web.
- Can I use AWS API Gateway for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is AWS API Gateway best used for?
- AWS API Gateway is most often used for fronting lambda functions with an http endpoint, rest and http api management with throttling and keys, websocket apis for real-time clients, private apis reachable only inside a vpc. Of those, fronting lambda functions with an http endpoint and rest and http api management with throttling and keys are not what Sanity is typically brought in for.
- What can AWS API Gateway do that Sanity cannot?
- AWS API Gateway covers REST APIs, WebSocket APIs, HTTP APIs, Lambda. Sanity covers Content API, Collaborative editing, Structured content, Webhooks.
Related pages
More on AWS API Gateway
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- AWS API Gateway vs Appwrite
- AWS API Gateway vs Hasura
- AWS API Gateway vs PocketBase
- AWS API Gateway vs Apigee
- AWS API Gateway vs Bruno
- AWS API Gateway vs KeystoneJS
- AWS API Gateway vs Parse Server
- AWS API Gateway vs Stoplight
- AWS API Gateway vs Strapi
- AWS API Gateway vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- AWS API Gateway vs Thunder Client
- AWS API Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager
- AWS API Gateway vs 3scale
- AWS API Gateway vs Akana
- AWS API Gateway vs Asyncapi
- AWS API Gateway vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- AWS API Gateway vs Backendless
- Sanity vs Appwrite
- Sanity vs Hasura
- Sanity vs PocketBase
- Sanity vs Apigee
- Sanity vs Bruno
- Sanity vs KeystoneJS
- Sanity vs Parse Server
- Sanity vs Stoplight
- Sanity vs Strapi
- Sanity vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Sanity vs Thunder Client
- Sanity vs WSO2 API Manager
- Sanity vs 3scale
- Sanity vs Akana
- Sanity vs Asyncapi
- Sanity vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Sanity vs Backendless
