Networking · head to head
MikroTik RouterOS vs OpenVPN

MikroTik RouterOS
Networking
Router and network operating system with a one-time perpetual licence rather than a recurring subscription
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

OpenVPN
Networking
Open source VPN protocol with a commercial Access Server product priced per simultaneous connection
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OpenVPN has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: MikroTik RouterOS the management interface and overall polish are less refined than enterprise competitors like Cisco or Juniper, and the learning curve for advanced configuration is real; OpenVPN open source OpenVPN, while free, requires real technical skill to configure, secure and maintain without the Access Server admin layer
- They diverge on capability: MikroTik RouterOS covers Full routing and firewall stack, OpenVPN covers Open source core.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which MikroTik RouterOS and OpenVPN actually diverge.
| Attribute | MikroTik RouterOS | OpenVPN |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | One-time purchase, per licence level | Open source core is free; Access Server billed per simultaneous connection |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web | Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Networking).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in MikroTik RouterOS
- Full routing and firewall stack
- Perpetual licensing
- Cloud Hosted Router (CHR)
- Winbox and CLI management
- Wireless and VLAN support
Only in OpenVPN
- Open source core
- Access Server admin UI
- Per-connection licensing
- Free tier
- Cross-platform clients
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
MikroTik RouterOS
- A network engineer or small ISP wanting capable BGP and firewall routing hardware at a lower total cost than Cisco or Juniper equivalentsnot OpenVPN
- An organisation that specifically wants to avoid ongoing recurring licence dependency for core routing hardwarenot OpenVPN
- A team wanting to run RouterOS as a virtual router in the cloud (CHR) with its own separate perpetual licensing tiersnot OpenVPN
- A hobbyist or small business self-managing network infrastructure without a vendor support contractnot OpenVPN
OpenVPN
- A technical team wanting a fully free, self-configured VPN server using the open source protocol without any vendor relationshipnot MikroTik RouterOS
- A small business wanting a supported, easier-to-administer VPN server, willing to pay per concurrent connection rather than per employeenot MikroTik RouterOS
- An organisation with more staff than typical concurrent VPN usage, since Access Server bills only active simultaneous connections, not total accountsnot MikroTik RouterOS
- An IoT or large-scale deployment needing custom Enterprise pricing above 2,000 connectionsnot MikroTik RouterOS
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
MikroTik RouterOS
- The management interface and overall polish are less refined than enterprise competitors like Cisco or Juniper, and the learning curve for advanced configuration is real
- Formal vendor support is thinner than what an enterprise buyer gets from Cisco or Juniper; community forums and documentation are the primary self-support resource
- Feature and licence-level naming (Level 3 through Level 6, and separately Free/P1/P10/P-Unlimited on CHR) is confusing enough that buyers commonly need to research which level a given deployment actually requires
- Perpetual licensing on hardware, while avoiding a recurring fee, also means MikroTik has less ongoing incentive to keep pushing free feature updates to a specific licence level indefinitely, and major version jumps sometimes bring new requirements
- Hardware build quality and long-term reliability at the low end of MikroTik's range is more variable than higher-priced enterprise-grade routing hardware
- Security patch cadence and past history of vulnerabilities in RouterOS mean patching discipline matters more without vendor-managed cloud updates the way Meraki or Mist provide automatically
OpenVPN
- Open source OpenVPN, while free, requires real technical skill to configure, secure and maintain without the Access Server admin layer
- Per-connection billing on Access Server means usage spikes, such as an all-hands remote day, can push simultaneous connections over a licensed limit and block new connections until usage drops or the plan is upgraded
- OpenVPN's traditional hub-and-spoke architecture routes traffic through a central server, unlike mesh VPN tools like Tailscale or NetBird that establish direct peer-to-peer connections where possible, which can add latency
- Client configuration and certificate management for the open source version is more manual and error-prone than newer VPN tools with zero-config onboarding
- Access Server pricing above the Growth tier reverts to custom Enterprise quoting, so very large deployments lose the pricing transparency of the lower tiers
- The protocol's throughput is generally lower than newer kernel-integrated protocols like WireGuard under equivalent conditions, which matters for high-bandwidth use cases
Pricing, plan by plan
MikroTik RouterOS
On request- RouterOS (bundled with hardware)$undefined/one-time
- Licence level included with the router purchase price
- Perpetual, does not expire
- Cloud Hosted Router (CHR)$undefined/one-time
- Free tier available with throughput limits
- P1, P10 and P-Unlimited perpetual licence levels
- 60-day trial on paid levels
OpenVPN
Free- Access Server FreeFree
- Up to 2 simultaneous connections
- All features included
- Access Server Growth$7/month
- Per simultaneous connection beyond the free tier
- Annual billing
- Access Server Enterprise/IoT$undefined/month
- Custom pricing for 2,000+ connections
Which should you pick?
Choose MikroTik RouterOS if
- You need full routing and firewall stack.
- You also want perpetual licensing.
Choose OpenVPN if
- You need open source core.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android.
- You also want access server admin ui.
Questions people ask
- Is MikroTik RouterOS or OpenVPN better?
- Neither clearly leads. MikroTik RouterOS starts at On request and OpenVPN at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, MikroTik RouterOS or OpenVPN?
- OpenVPN has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for MikroTik RouterOS and Free for OpenVPN.
- Does MikroTik RouterOS or OpenVPN run on more platforms?
- MikroTik RouterOS runs on Web. OpenVPN runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android.
- Can I use OpenVPN for free?
- Yes. OpenVPN has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. MikroTik RouterOS starts at On request.
- What is MikroTik RouterOS best used for?
- MikroTik RouterOS is most often used for a network engineer or small isp wanting capable bgp and firewall routing hardware at a lower total cost than cisco or juniper equivalents, an organisation that specifically wants to avoid ongoing recurring licence dependency for core routing hardware, a team wanting to run routeros as a virtual router in the cloud (chr) with its own separate perpetual licensing tiers, a hobbyist or small business self-managing network infrastructure without a vendor support contract. Of those, a network engineer or small isp wanting capable bgp and firewall routing hardware at a lower total cost than cisco or juniper equivalents and an organisation that specifically wants to avoid ongoing recurring licence dependency for core routing hardware are not what OpenVPN is typically brought in for.
- What can MikroTik RouterOS do that OpenVPN cannot?
- MikroTik RouterOS covers Full routing and firewall stack, Perpetual licensing, Cloud Hosted Router (CHR), Winbox and CLI management. OpenVPN covers Open source core, Access Server admin UI, Per-connection licensing, Free tier.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
MikroTik RouterOS: Does a MikroTik router stop working if I stop paying anything?
No, the RouterOS licence bundled with hardware is a one-time purchase and does not expire or require ongoing payment.
OpenVPN: Is OpenVPN free?
The open source protocol and software are free under the GPL; Access Server, the commercial packaged product, charges per simultaneous connection beyond a free 2-connection tier.
MikroTik RouterOS: Is CHR licensed the same way as physical hardware?
It uses its own separate perpetual licence tiers (Free, P1, P10, P-Unlimited) rather than the Level 3-6 scheme used on physical hardware.
OpenVPN: What counts as a connection for billing purposes?
A simultaneously active connected device, not a registered user account or total device count; unlimited accounts and devices can be created but only the licensed number can be connected at once.
MikroTik RouterOS: Can I upgrade a licence level later?
Yes, upgrading to a higher licence level is possible at the price difference between levels rather than buying a new licence outright.
OpenVPN: How does OpenVPN compare with WireGuard-based tools like Tailscale?
OpenVPN uses a traditional hub-and-spoke VPN architecture rather than the mesh, peer-to-peer approach used by newer tools like Tailscale or NetBird.
Related pages
More on MikroTik RouterOS
Other head to heads
- MikroTik RouterOS vs pfSense
- MikroTik RouterOS vs Cisco Meraki
- MikroTik RouterOS vs OPNsense
- MikroTik RouterOS vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- MikroTik RouterOS vs PRTG Network Monitor
- MikroTik RouterOS vs NetBird
- MikroTik RouterOS vs LibreNMS
- MikroTik RouterOS vs Icinga
- MikroTik RouterOS vs Juniper Mist
- MikroTik RouterOS vs Kentik
- MikroTik RouterOS vs Zabbix
- MikroTik RouterOS vs Traefik
- MikroTik RouterOS vs ZeroTier
- MikroTik RouterOS vs Nebula
- MikroTik RouterOS vs ngrok
- MikroTik RouterOS vs Tailscale
- MikroTik RouterOS vs Domotz
- MikroTik RouterOS vs Twingate
- MikroTik RouterOS vs Consul
- MikroTik RouterOS vs Palo Alto Networks
- MikroTik RouterOS vs Splunk
- OpenVPN vs pfSense
- OpenVPN vs Cisco Meraki
- OpenVPN vs OPNsense
- OpenVPN vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- OpenVPN vs PRTG Network Monitor
- OpenVPN vs NetBird
- OpenVPN vs LibreNMS
- OpenVPN vs Icinga
- OpenVPN vs Juniper Mist
- OpenVPN vs Kentik
- OpenVPN vs Zabbix
- OpenVPN vs Traefik
- OpenVPN vs ZeroTier
- OpenVPN vs Nebula
- OpenVPN vs ngrok
- OpenVPN vs Tailscale
- OpenVPN vs Domotz
- OpenVPN vs Twingate
- OpenVPN vs Consul
- OpenVPN vs Palo Alto Networks
- OpenVPN vs Splunk
