Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Serverless Framework

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Serverless Framework
Cloud
Build and deploy serverless applications on AWS Lambda
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Serverless Framework exclusive to AWS Lambda - no support for other cloud providers
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, Serverless Framework covers YAML configuration.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Serverless Framework actually diverge.
| Attribute | authentik | Serverless Framework |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open-source core with a paid enterprise tier | Unknown |
| Platforms | Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted | AWS Lambda, AWS API Gateway, AWS CloudFormation |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Cloud |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Serverless Framework
- YAML configuration
- Single command deployment
- Extensible plugin ecosystem
- Multi-language support
- Unified dashboard
- Built-in metrics and alerts
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Serverless Framework
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Serverless Framework
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Serverless Framework
Serverless Framework
- Deploying APIs and microservices to AWS Lambdanot authentik
- Building event-driven applications with serverless functionsnot authentik
- Managing multi-language serverless projectsnot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Serverless Framework
- Exclusive to AWS Lambda - no support for other cloud providers
- Paid tier requires credit system that can be confusing for budgeting
- Plugin ecosystem quality varies significantly
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Serverless Framework
Free- FreeFree
- For organizations with under $2M annual revenue
- All Framework features included
- Pay-As-You-Go$4/credit
- 1 credit = 1 Service Instance or 50K Traces or 4M Metrics
- Standard rate for larger organizations
- Reserved Credits$1/credit
- Discounts up to 74% off (1-year), 77% off (2-year), 80% off (3-year)
- Additional 10% off for upfront payment
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Serverless Framework if
- You need yaml configuration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS Lambda, AWS API Gateway, AWS CloudFormation.
- You also want single command deployment.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Serverless Framework better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Serverless Framework at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Serverless Framework?
- authentik starts at Free and Serverless Framework at Free.
- Does authentik or Serverless Framework run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Serverless Framework runs on AWS Lambda, AWS API Gateway, AWS CloudFormation.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Serverless Framework is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Serverless Framework cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. Serverless Framework covers YAML configuration, Single command deployment, Extensible plugin ecosystem, Multi-language support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Serverless Framework: When do I have to pay for Serverless Framework?
The Serverless Framework CLI v4+ is free for organizations earning under $2 million annually. Organizations earning more must purchase credits at $4 per credit standard rate or reserved credits starting at $1 per credit with volume discounts.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Serverless Framework: What cloud providers does Serverless Framework support?
Serverless Framework is exclusive to AWS Lambda. It does not support other cloud providers like Azure or Google Cloud.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Serverless Framework: What does one credit cover?
One credit equals 1 Service Instance, 50,000 Traces, or 4 Million Metrics.
SourceRelated pages
More on Serverless Framework
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs Pulumi
- authentik vs Nitric
- authentik vs Packer
- authentik vs SST
- authentik vs Cerebrium
- authentik vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- authentik vs Beam Cloud
- authentik vs Deno Deploy
- authentik vs Koyeb
- authentik vs Terragrunt
- authentik vs Neon
- authentik vs Upstash
- authentik vs Fastly
- authentik vs Flux
- authentik vs Google Cloud Platform
- authentik vs HAProxy
- authentik vs IBM Cloud
- authentik vs kind
- Serverless Framework vs Authelia
- Serverless Framework vs Logto
- Serverless Framework vs Ory
- Serverless Framework vs Passbolt
- Serverless Framework vs Clerk
- Serverless Framework vs 1Password
- Serverless Framework vs Frontegg
- Serverless Framework vs OWASP ZAP
- Serverless Framework vs Infisical
- Serverless Framework vs Chainguard
- Serverless Framework vs Bitwarden
- Serverless Framework vs Cosign
- Serverless Framework vs CyberGhost VPN
- Serverless Framework vs Dahua Technology
- Serverless Framework vs Descope
- Serverless Framework vs Drata
- Serverless Framework vs DTiQ
- Serverless Framework vs Ory Kratos
- Serverless Framework vs Pulumi
- Serverless Framework vs Nitric
- Serverless Framework vs Packer
- Serverless Framework vs SST
- Serverless Framework vs Cerebrium
- Serverless Framework vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Serverless Framework vs Beam Cloud
- Serverless Framework vs Deno Deploy
- Serverless Framework vs Koyeb
- Serverless Framework vs Terragrunt
- Serverless Framework vs Neon
- Serverless Framework vs Upstash
- Serverless Framework vs Fastly
- Serverless Framework vs Flux
- Serverless Framework vs Google Cloud Platform
- Serverless Framework vs HAProxy
- Serverless Framework vs IBM Cloud
- Serverless Framework vs kind
