Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs LogRhythm SIEM

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

LogRhythm SIEM
Cybersecurity
AI-powered SIEM platform for modern security operations
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only authentik has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; LogRhythm SIEM no pricing published; sales contact required
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, LogRhythm SIEM covers AI-driven analytics.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and LogRhythm SIEM actually diverge.
| Attribute | authentik | LogRhythm SIEM |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Open-source core with a paid enterprise tier | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted | Web, Api |
| Founded | Unknown | 2003 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in LogRhythm SIEM
- AI-driven analytics
- UEBA
- NDR integration
- SOAR automation
- Threat lifecycle management
- Case management
- Compliance reporting
- Embedded playbooks
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot LogRhythm SIEM
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot LogRhythm SIEM
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot LogRhythm SIEM
LogRhythm SIEM
- Security information and event managementnot authentik
- Threat detection and incident responsenot authentik
- Compliance monitoring and reportingnot authentik
- User and entity behavior analyticsnot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
LogRhythm SIEM
- No pricing published; sales contact required
- No public information on licensing model or per-unit costs
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
LogRhythm SIEM
On request- LogRhythm SIEMFree
- Threat detection
- Log management
- Compliance
- LogRhythm AxonFree
- Cloud-native SIEM
- Self-service deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed Detection & ResponseFree
- 24/7 monitoring
- Expert analysts
- Threat hunting
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose LogRhythm SIEM if
- You need ai-driven analytics.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want ueba.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or LogRhythm SIEM better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and LogRhythm SIEM at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or LogRhythm SIEM?
- authentik has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for authentik and On request for LogRhythm SIEM.
- Does authentik or LogRhythm SIEM run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. LogRhythm SIEM runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Yes. authentik has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. LogRhythm SIEM starts at On request.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what LogRhythm SIEM is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that LogRhythm SIEM cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. LogRhythm SIEM covers AI-driven analytics, UEBA, NDR integration, SOAR automation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
LogRhythm SIEM: How does Exabeam (formerly LogRhythm SIEM) handle pricing?
Exabeam does not publish pricing on its website. To obtain pricing information, request a demo through the website or contact Exabeam's sales team directly for a personalized quote based on your deployment size and requirements.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
LogRhythm SIEM: Is there a free trial or freemium version of Exabeam?
Exabeam does not advertise a free trial or freemium tier on its homepage. Interested buyers must contact the sales team to discuss trial availability and pricing options.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Related pages
More on LogRhythm SIEM
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs Bitdefender Total Security
- authentik vs Norton 360
- authentik vs LastPass
- authentik vs Microsoft Sentinel
- authentik vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- authentik vs IBM QRadar
- authentik vs Sysdig
- authentik vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- authentik vs Darktrace
- authentik vs SentinelOne Singularity
- authentik vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- authentik vs NordPass
- authentik vs One Identity
- authentik vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- LogRhythm SIEM vs Authelia
- LogRhythm SIEM vs Logto
- LogRhythm SIEM vs Ory
- LogRhythm SIEM vs Passbolt
- LogRhythm SIEM vs Clerk
- LogRhythm SIEM vs 1Password
- LogRhythm SIEM vs Frontegg
- LogRhythm SIEM vs OWASP ZAP
- LogRhythm SIEM vs Infisical
- LogRhythm SIEM vs Chainguard
- LogRhythm SIEM vs Bitwarden
- LogRhythm SIEM vs Cosign
- LogRhythm SIEM vs CyberGhost VPN
- LogRhythm SIEM vs Dahua Technology
- LogRhythm SIEM vs Descope
- LogRhythm SIEM vs Drata
- LogRhythm SIEM vs DTiQ
- LogRhythm SIEM vs Ory Kratos
- LogRhythm SIEM vs Bitdefender Total Security
- LogRhythm SIEM vs Norton 360
- LogRhythm SIEM vs LastPass
- LogRhythm SIEM vs Microsoft Sentinel
- LogRhythm SIEM vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- LogRhythm SIEM vs IBM QRadar
- LogRhythm SIEM vs Sysdig
- LogRhythm SIEM vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- LogRhythm SIEM vs Darktrace
- LogRhythm SIEM vs SentinelOne Singularity
- LogRhythm SIEM vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- LogRhythm SIEM vs NordPass
- LogRhythm SIEM vs One Identity
- LogRhythm SIEM vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
