Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Lago

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Lago
Accounting
Open-source billing infrastructure for usage-based models
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Lago free tier limited to 10,000 entities per month with 5M event cap
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, Lago covers Real-time usage metering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Lago actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Lago
- Real-time usage metering
- Multiple pricing models
- Automated invoicing
- Prepaid credits
- Entitlements
- Multi-currency support
- Payment orchestration
- Revenue analytics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Lago
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Lago
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Lago
Lago
- Building usage-based billing for high-volume APIs and infrastructurenot authentik
- Implementing metered billing for AI and tokenized servicesnot authentik
- Creating subscription and hybrid pricing modelsnot authentik
- Managing multi-currency billing for global companiesnot authentik
- Maintaining billing infrastructure without vendor lock-innot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Lago
- Free tier limited to 10,000 entities per month with 5M event cap
- No specific pricing published for Pro annual plan or Scale plan
- Self-hosted and on-premise deployments require engineering resources
- Community support only on free tier
- Scale plan requires annual contracts and sales engagement
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Lago
Free- Build (Free)Free
- 10,000 managed entities per month
- 5M usage events per month
- 1K events per second rate limit
- Pro$399/month
- 10,000 entities included (graduated pricing to 100K)
- 25M usage events included (to 500M with graduated rates)
- 10K events per second (upgradeable to 100K)
- Scale$null/custom
- Custom entity and event volumes
- 50K events per second (upgradeable to 100K)
- RBAC and SSO (SAML)
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Lago if
- You need real-time usage metering.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Cloud, Self-hosted, On-premise, VPC.
- You also want multiple pricing models.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Lago better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Lago at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Lago?
- authentik starts at Free and Lago at Free.
- Does authentik or Lago run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Lago runs on Web, Cloud, Self-hosted, On-premise, VPC.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Lago is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Lago cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. Lago covers Real-time usage metering, Multiple pricing models, Automated invoicing, Prepaid credits.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Lago: Can I use Lago open-source for free?
Yes, Lago is open-source under the AGPLv3 license and can be self-hosted. The cloud-based Build plan is also free with limits of 10,000 entities and 5M events per month.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Lago: What payment providers does Lago integrate with?
Lago integrates with Stripe and Adyen for payment processing. It is not a payment processor itself but orchestrates payments through these providers.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Lago: Does Lago support multiple currencies?
Yes, Lago supports multi-currency billing with automatic currency conversion for global businesses.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs Orb
- authentik vs Metronome
- authentik vs Stigg
- authentik vs Dodo Payments
- authentik vs Creem
- authentik vs Invoicera
- authentik vs Polar
- authentik vs Maxio
- authentik vs Zuora
- authentik vs Paddle
- authentik vs Invoicely
- authentik vs QuickBooks
- authentik vs Mercury
- authentik vs Mesh Payments
- authentik vs Money Forward Cloud
- authentik vs Moneybird
- authentik vs MYOB
- authentik vs Netvisor
- Lago vs Authelia
- Lago vs Logto
- Lago vs Ory
- Lago vs Passbolt
- Lago vs Clerk
- Lago vs 1Password
- Lago vs Frontegg
- Lago vs OWASP ZAP
- Lago vs Infisical
- Lago vs Chainguard
- Lago vs Bitwarden
- Lago vs Cosign
- Lago vs CyberGhost VPN
- Lago vs Dahua Technology
- Lago vs Descope
- Lago vs Drata
- Lago vs DTiQ
- Lago vs Ory Kratos
- Lago vs Orb
- Lago vs Metronome
- Lago vs Stigg
- Lago vs Dodo Payments
- Lago vs Creem
- Lago vs Invoicera
- Lago vs Polar
- Lago vs Maxio
- Lago vs Zuora
- Lago vs Paddle
- Lago vs Invoicely
- Lago vs QuickBooks
- Lago vs Mercury
- Lago vs Mesh Payments
- Lago vs Money Forward Cloud
- Lago vs Moneybird
- Lago vs MYOB
- Lago vs Netvisor
