Softwr

Research · head to head

Reduct vs Suzy

Reduct logo

Reduct

Research

Edit video by editing its transcript, built for researchers rather than video editors

From
$12/month
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Suzy logo

Suzy

Research

Enterprise consumer insights on an owned US panel, resold elsewhere through Cint

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Reduct automatic transcription struggles with technical vocabulary, product names and strong accents, so teams working in specialist domains spend real time correcting transcripts or pay extra for the human transcription add-on, which erodes the cost advantage.; Suzy the proprietary Crowdtap panel is US only at around a million consumers with roughly 50,000 verified active monthly, and everything international is resold Cint supply, so the speed and verification argument that justifies the price applies to one market.
  • They diverge on capability: Reduct covers Transcript-based editing, Suzy covers Suzy Insights.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Reduct and Suzy actually diverge.

Attributes where Reduct and Suzy differ
AttributeReductSuzy
Starting price$12/monthOn request
Pricing modelPer user per monthquote
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb, iOS, Android

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Research).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Reduct

  • Transcript-based editing
  • Automatic transcription
  • Human transcription add-on
  • Highlight and tagging
  • Reel assembly
  • Redaction
  • Multicam sync
  • Collaborative commenting

Only in Suzy

  • Suzy Insights
  • Suzy Live
  • Suzy Audiences
  • Suzy Speaks
  • Video open ends
  • Advanced methods
  • Data Explorer
  • AI Decision Engine

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Reduct

  • A research team that runs twenty customer interviews a quarter and needs stakeholders across product and design to watch and comment without buying them seatsnot Suzy
  • A researcher assembling a five-minute highlight reel of user pain points for an executive review, working from transcript text rather than a video timelinenot Suzy
  • A public defender office redacting faces and identifying details from body-camera and interview footage before disclosurenot Suzy
  • A global insights team transcribing and translating interviews across several languages before coding them thematicallynot Suzy

Suzy

  • A US consumer packaged goods brand that needs concept testing back the same day because a packaging decision is due at the end of the week.not Reduct
  • An insights department running an always-on brand tracker on a US audience without re-commissioning fieldwork every wave.not Reduct
  • A team that wants quant screening followed immediately by moderated qual with the same respondents, rather than two vendors and two timelines.not Reduct
  • A product team testing claims and price sensitivity with MaxDiff and conjoint on a panel they can go back to repeatedly.not Reduct

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Reduct

  • Automatic transcription struggles with technical vocabulary, product names and strong accents, so teams working in specialist domains spend real time correcting transcripts or pay extra for the human transcription add-on, which erodes the cost advantage.
  • Transcription hours are a pooled annual allowance rather than monthly, so a team that front-loads a large research programme in one quarter can exhaust the year and face overage charges for the remaining nine months.
  • The Personal tier caps file size at 4GB, which is easily exceeded by an hour of multicam or high-bitrate recording, forcing an upgrade for reasons unrelated to the feature set.
  • Independent review coverage is very thin, so there is little public evidence to check vendor claims against, and buyers effectively have to rely on their own trial rather than peer signal.
  • The company has raised only about 4 million USD since 2018 and remains small, which makes enterprise vendor viability review and data-export planning genuinely necessary before you make it the home of years of research recordings.

Suzy

  • The proprietary Crowdtap panel is US only at around a million consumers with roughly 50,000 verified active monthly, and everything international is resold Cint supply, so the speed and verification argument that justifies the price applies to one market.
  • Customers have asked Suzy to build proprietary panels with native speakers in Germany, France, Japan, India and Brazil, which confirms those do not exist today; multi-market brands need a second vendor and lose the single-source comparison.
  • Reviewers report the panel skews female and millennial and falls short on Gen Z, male and various ethnic segments, and that niche or B2B audiences are hard to reach, so quota fills can be slow or impossible.
  • Reviewers also raise data trust concerns about respondent sourcing and vetting, including one naming bot responses and acquiescence bias, which is the standing risk of any single owned opt-in panel with repeat respondents.
  • Pricing is a sales-led annual commitment reported to run around $88,000 a year at the median with onboarding fees and per-seat charges on top, with no trial, no self-serve and no pay-per-response option, so there is no cheap way to validate fit.
  • Credits are pre-committed monthly against forecast activity with no published overage rate, so under-use is wasted spend and a busy quarter triggers an unbudgeted purchase.
  • Integrations are genuinely thin: there is no public integrations page and no public API documentation, and the only confirmed external data relationship is Cint, so expect to move data by export.

Pricing, plan by plan

Reduct

$12/month
  • Personal$12/month
    • 120 transcription hours per editor per year
    • Up to 10 commenters
    • 720p export
  • Professional$40/month
    • 300 transcription hours per editor per year
    • Up to 50 commenters
    • Timeline view
  • Enterprise$75/month
    • 4K export
    • SAML and Google SSO
    • SOC 2 Type II

Suzy

On request
  • Suzy$undefined/year
    • Annual subscription with pre-committed monthly research credits
    • Credit volume set against forecast study activity
    • Onboarding fees and per-seat charges quoted separately

Which should you pick?

Choose Reduct if

  • You need transcript-based editing.
  • You work on Web, API.
  • You also want automatic transcription.
Reduct review

Choose Suzy if

  • You need suzy insights.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want suzy live.
Suzy review

Questions people ask

Is Reduct or Suzy better?
Neither clearly leads. Reduct starts at $12/month and Suzy at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Reduct or Suzy?
Reduct starts at $12/month and Suzy at On request.
Does Reduct or Suzy run on more platforms?
Reduct runs on Web, API. Suzy runs on Web, iOS, Android.
What is Reduct best used for?
Reduct is most often used for a research team that runs twenty customer interviews a quarter and needs stakeholders across product and design to watch and comment without buying them seats, a researcher assembling a five-minute highlight reel of user pain points for an executive review, working from transcript text rather than a video timeline, a public defender office redacting faces and identifying details from body-camera and interview footage before disclosure, a global insights team transcribing and translating interviews across several languages before coding them thematically. Of those, a research team that runs twenty customer interviews a quarter and needs stakeholders across product and design to watch and comment without buying them seats and a researcher assembling a five-minute highlight reel of user pain points for an executive review, working from transcript text rather than a video timeline are not what Suzy is typically brought in for.
What can Reduct do that Suzy cannot?
Reduct covers Transcript-based editing, Automatic transcription, Human transcription add-on, Highlight and tagging. Suzy covers Suzy Insights, Suzy Live, Suzy Audiences, Suzy Speaks.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Reduct: How is Reduct priced?

Per editor per month: 12 USD on Personal, 40 on Professional and from 75 on Enterprise, with transcription supplied as a pooled annual hour allowance per editor.

Suzy: Is the panel global?

No. Crowdtap, the owned panel, is US only. International studies run on Cint supply, which you could contract for directly.

Reduct: Do stakeholders who only watch and comment need a paid seat?

No. Commenters are separate from editor seats and included up to 10 on Personal and 50 on Professional, which is the main reason research teams choose it.

Suzy: What does it cost?

Nothing is published. Third-party analysis puts the median contract around $88,000 a year with a range roughly $34,000 to $187,500, plus onboarding and per-seat fees.

Reduct: Can I use it as a proper video editor?

Only up to a point. It handles transcript-driven cutting, reels and multicam sync, then exports to Premiere Pro or Final Cut Pro when you need real finishing.

Suzy: Is there an API?

Nothing public. Suzy publishes no API documentation and no named connectors beyond Cint. Verify any integration requirement in the sales call before committing.

Reduct: Is there a free tier?

No. There is a 14-day trial on Professional with five hours of transcription, but no permanent free plan.

Suzy: What changed in April 2026?

Suzy repositioned as an AI Decision Engine with Intelligence and Impact modules, while headcount fell from about 230 to 186. Ask how the roadmap is now split between that and the classic survey and qual products.

Share

Related pages

More on Reduct

More on Suzy

Keep looking

Other head to heads