Construction · head to head
Assignar vs Foundation Software

Assignar
Construction
Crew, equipment and compliance dispatch for self-perform and speciality contractors
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Foundation Software
Construction
Job cost accounting and construction payroll for contractors running certified and union jobs
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Assignar it is built for contractors who own crews and plant, so a general contractor coordinating subcontractors gets little from it beyond its own self-perform scopes.; Foundation Software no pricing is published anywhere, so shortlisting requires sitting through a sales process before you know whether the product is within budget at all.
- They diverge on capability: Assignar covers Crew and equipment scheduling, Foundation Software covers Job costing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Assignar and Foundation Software actually diverge.
| Attribute | Assignar | Foundation Software |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Windows, Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Assignar
- Crew and equipment scheduling
- Digital dockets and timesheets
- Compliance and competency tracking
- Forms and inspections
- Offline mobile capture
- Production and cost reporting
Only in Foundation Software
- Job costing
- Certified payroll
- Union payroll
- AIA billing
- Equipment costing
- Service dispatch
- Mobile time entry
- Executive dashboards
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Assignar
- A civil contractor scheduling crews and plant across multiple sites from one dispatch boardnot Foundation Software
- A concrete or earthworks subcontractor replacing paper dockets that arrive three days latenot Foundation Software
- A contractor that must prove operator competency and induction status on regulated sitesnot Foundation Software
- A self-perform contractor comparing actual crew hours against estimated production ratesnot Foundation Software
Foundation Software
- A union electrical or mechanical contractor whose payroll spans several trades and fringe schedules in the same weeknot Assignar
- A general contractor bidding federally funded work that requires weekly certified payroll filingsnot Assignar
- A contractor whose QuickBooks file has outgrown job costing and who is reconciling work in progress in spreadsheetsnot Assignar
- A firm with owned plant that needs equipment hours costed back to jobs to see true contract marginnot Assignar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Assignar
- It is built for contractors who own crews and plant, so a general contractor coordinating subcontractors gets little from it beyond its own self-perform scopes.
- It is not an accounting or payroll system, so the value depends on a clean integration to your finance system and on someone owning the reconciliation when hours disagree.
- Australian origins show in terminology and compliance defaults, and North American users spend setup time translating concepts such as tickets and inductions into local equivalents.
- Offline capture works, but photo-heavy forms on poor connections remain the weak point and should be tested on your worst site before a full rollout.
- Supervisors have to maintain the schedule for the reporting to mean anything, and dispatchers used to a whiteboard resist that for months unless the change is enforced.
Foundation Software
- No pricing is published anywhere, so shortlisting requires sitting through a sales process before you know whether the product is within budget at all.
- Implementation, data conversion and training are billed separately from the licence and routinely run into five figures, which buyers comparing monthly software subscriptions do not budget for.
- The payroll compliance engine is built for United States federal and state law, so the product has essentially no value to contractors outside the US.
- The interface is a long-lived Windows-style application, and staff hired from cloud-native tools find it slow to learn compared with Buildertrend or Procore.
- Project management, document control and field collaboration are weaker than the dedicated construction platforms, so most sites end up running Foundation for money and something else for the job, and paying twice.
Pricing, plan by plan
Assignar
On request- Assignar$undefined/year
- Crew and equipment scheduling
- Digital dockets and timesheets
- Compliance tracking
Foundation Software
On request- FOUNDATION$undefined/year
- Modular licensing, priced by modules and user count
- Cloud hosted or installed on your own server
- Separate one-off implementation, data conversion and training fee
Which should you pick?
Choose Assignar if
- You need crew and equipment scheduling.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want digital dockets and timesheets.
Choose Foundation Software if
- You need job costing.
- You work on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want certified payroll.
Questions people ask
- Is Assignar or Foundation Software better?
- Neither clearly leads. Assignar starts at On request and Foundation Software at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Assignar or Foundation Software?
- Assignar starts at On request and Foundation Software at On request.
- Does Assignar or Foundation Software run on more platforms?
- Assignar runs on Web, iOS, Android. Foundation Software runs on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Assignar best used for?
- Assignar is most often used for a civil contractor scheduling crews and plant across multiple sites from one dispatch board, a concrete or earthworks subcontractor replacing paper dockets that arrive three days late, a contractor that must prove operator competency and induction status on regulated sites, a self-perform contractor comparing actual crew hours against estimated production rates. Of those, a civil contractor scheduling crews and plant across multiple sites from one dispatch board and a concrete or earthworks subcontractor replacing paper dockets that arrive three days late are not what Foundation Software is typically brought in for.
- What can Assignar do that Foundation Software cannot?
- Assignar covers Crew and equipment scheduling, Digital dockets and timesheets, Compliance and competency tracking, Forms and inspections. Foundation Software covers Job costing, Certified payroll, Union payroll, AIA billing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Assignar: Is this for general contractors or subcontractors?
Speciality and self-perform contractors. The unit of work is a crew and a machine on a shift, which is not how a general contractor coordinates trades.
Foundation Software: How much does Foundation Software cost?
The vendor publishes no rates. Pricing is assembled per contractor from module selection and user count, with a separate implementation fee, and is only given after a discovery call.
Assignar: Does the mobile app work without signal?
Yes, entries are captured offline and synchronised later. Test it with photos attached on your worst site, because that is where sync problems appear.
Foundation Software: Does it replace Procore?
No. Foundation is the accounting and payroll system; Procore is project management. They integrate, and many contractors run both.
Assignar: Does it handle payroll?
No. It captures hours and quantities and passes them to your payroll or enterprise resource planning system.
Foundation Software: Can it handle certified payroll for multiple states?
Yes, it produces state-specific certified payroll formats as well as the federal WH-347, which is the main reason multi-state contractors buy it.
Foundation Software: Is there a cloud version?
Yes, it is offered hosted as well as on-premise, but the hosted version is the same application delivered remotely rather than a rebuilt browser product.
Related pages
More on Foundation Software
Other head to heads
- Assignar vs HCSS
- Assignar vs Raken
- Assignar vs Procore
- Assignar vs GCPay
- Assignar vs Topcon MAGNET
- Assignar vs Kojo
- Assignar vs Siteline
- Assignar vs Clearstory
- Assignar vs HammerTech
- Assignar vs ConstructConnect
- Assignar vs CMiC
- Assignar vs Document Crunch
- Assignar vs JobTread
- Assignar vs Jonas Premier
- Assignar vs Kahua
- Assignar vs Navisworks
- Assignar vs Newforma
- Assignar vs Adaptive
- Assignar vs Sage 300 Construction
- Assignar vs Briq
- Assignar vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- Assignar vs Trunk Tools
- Assignar vs Microsoft Project
- Assignar vs Egnyte
- Assignar vs Fieldwire
- Assignar vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Foundation Software vs HCSS
- Foundation Software vs Raken
- Foundation Software vs Procore
- Foundation Software vs GCPay
- Foundation Software vs Topcon MAGNET
- Foundation Software vs Kojo
- Foundation Software vs Siteline
- Foundation Software vs Clearstory
- Foundation Software vs HammerTech
- Foundation Software vs ConstructConnect
- Foundation Software vs CMiC
- Foundation Software vs Document Crunch
- Foundation Software vs JobTread
- Foundation Software vs Jonas Premier
- Foundation Software vs Kahua
- Foundation Software vs Navisworks
- Foundation Software vs Newforma
- Foundation Software vs Adaptive
- Foundation Software vs Sage 300 Construction
- Foundation Software vs Briq
- Foundation Software vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- Foundation Software vs Trunk Tools
- Foundation Software vs Microsoft Project
- Foundation Software vs Egnyte
- Foundation Software vs Fieldwire
- Foundation Software vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
