Government · head to head
ArchiveSocial vs Sardine

ArchiveSocial
Government
Social media archiving that captures public agency accounts as legally defensible open records
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Sardine
Cybersecurity
Device intelligence and behaviour biometrics for fraud and compliance
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ArchiveSocial coverage depends entirely on third party platform APIs, so when a network restricts or reprices its API the archive's completeness changes for reasons the vendor does not control.; Sardine signal quality depends on the SDK being embedded in your own web and mobile clients, so fraud improvements become dependent on your app release cycle and any coverage gap is a blind spot.
- They diverge on capability: ArchiveSocial covers Continuous capture, Sardine covers Device intelligence.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ArchiveSocial and Sardine actually diverge.
| Attribute | ArchiveSocial | Sardine |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Government | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ArchiveSocial
- Continuous capture
- Deletion and edit capture
- Authenticated records
- Records request search
- Litigation hold export
- Multi platform coverage
Only in Sardine
- Device intelligence
- Behaviour biometrics
- Scam detection
- Onboarding risk scoring
- AML transaction monitoring
- Dispute and chargeback handling
- Rules editor
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ArchiveSocial
- A city whose legal department has flagged deleted social media comments as a records liabilitynot Sardine
- A police department that must produce social media records under an open records requestnot Sardine
- An agency under litigation hold needing authenticated social media evidence rather than screenshotsnot Sardine
- A communications team operating many accounts across departments with no consistent archivingnot Sardine
Sardine
- A neobank losing money to authorised push payment scams where the customer genuinely approved the transfernot ArchiveSocial
- A crypto exchange trying to detect accounts being operated by remote access rather than by their ownernot ArchiveSocial
- A fintech seeing synthetic identity signups that pass document verification but share device characteristicsnot ArchiveSocial
- A lender wanting first party fraud signals at application time that a credit bureau file does not containnot ArchiveSocial
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ArchiveSocial
- Coverage depends entirely on third party platform APIs, so when a network restricts or reprices its API the archive's completeness changes for reasons the vendor does not control.
- Pricing scales with the number of archived accounts, so an agency where every department runs its own page pays repeatedly for the same compliance obligation.
- It archives rather than governs, so it will faithfully preserve a policy violation without preventing it, and agencies still need social media policy and training.
- Since the 2021 CivicPlus acquisition the product is part of a municipal suite, so buyers avoiding that vendor for other reasons are still buying from them.
- The value is entirely insurance shaped, which makes it a perennial target during budget cuts right up until the first records request it would have answered.
Sardine
- Signal quality depends on the SDK being embedded in your own web and mobile clients, so fraud improvements become dependent on your app release cycle and any coverage gap is a blind spot.
- Behavioural and device telemetry collection needs a documented lawful basis under GDPR, and EU privacy reviews frequently delay rollouts that were scoped as engineering work.
- Pricing is per session or per active user, so a consumer product with many low value sessions pays in proportion to traffic rather than to fraud exposure.
- As a younger private company it lacks the enforcement-tested audit history that a bank examiner expects, which makes it a harder sell inside a regulated bank than inside a fintech.
- It is strongest on session-time signals and weaker as a system of record for long horizon AML typologies, so larger institutions end up running it alongside a traditional monitoring platform rather than instead of one.
Pricing, plan by plan
ArchiveSocial
On request- ArchiveSocial$undefined/year
- Quoted annually, typically scaled by number of archived accounts
- Additional accounts and platforms increase the subscription
- Bundled pricing common for agencies already buying CivicPlus products
Sardine
On request- Sardine$undefined/year
- Priced per user session or per monthly active user
- Annual contract with volume commitment
- SDK for web, iOS and Android
Which should you pick?
Choose ArchiveSocial if
- You need continuous capture.
- You also want deletion and edit capture.
Choose Sardine if
- You need device intelligence.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want behaviour biometrics.
Questions people ask
- Is ArchiveSocial or Sardine better?
- Neither clearly leads. ArchiveSocial starts at On request and Sardine at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ArchiveSocial or Sardine?
- ArchiveSocial starts at On request and Sardine at On request.
- Does ArchiveSocial or Sardine run on more platforms?
- ArchiveSocial runs on Web. Sardine runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is ArchiveSocial best used for?
- ArchiveSocial is most often used for a city whose legal department has flagged deleted social media comments as a records liability, a police department that must produce social media records under an open records request, an agency under litigation hold needing authenticated social media evidence rather than screenshots, a communications team operating many accounts across departments with no consistent archiving. Of those, a city whose legal department has flagged deleted social media comments as a records liability and a police department that must produce social media records under an open records request are not what Sardine is typically brought in for.
- What can ArchiveSocial do that Sardine cannot?
- ArchiveSocial covers Continuous capture, Deletion and edit capture, Authenticated records, Records request search. Sardine covers Device intelligence, Behaviour biometrics, Scam detection, Onboarding risk scoring.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ArchiveSocial: Why not just export data from the platforms?
Platform exports do not reliably capture deleted or edited content and carry no chain of custody, which is what makes an archive usable as evidence.
Sardine: Does Sardine do document verification?
It focuses on device, behavioural and transaction signals, and integrates identity verification providers rather than being one. Treat it as complementary to a KYC vendor.
ArchiveSocial: Are public comments on our posts records?
In many United States jurisdictions yes, and deleted comments have been the subject of litigation against agencies.
Sardine: What does it need from us to work?
An SDK in your web and mobile applications plus transaction feeds. Without the client side collector you lose the signals that differentiate it.
ArchiveSocial: Who owns ArchiveSocial?
CivicPlus, which acquired it in 2021 and sells it alongside its municipal website and communications products.
Sardine: Is pricing published?
No. It is quoted, typically per session or per monthly active user with an annual volume commitment.
ArchiveSocial: How is it priced?
By archived accounts, quoted rather than published. Comparable agency contracts are public records.
Related pages
More on ArchiveSocial
Other head to heads
- ArchiveSocial vs NextRequest
- ArchiveSocial vs Granicus
- ArchiveSocial vs Zencity
- ArchiveSocial vs Bonfire
- ArchiveSocial vs NEOGOV
- ArchiveSocial vs AWS GovCloud
- ArchiveSocial vs Clariti
- ArchiveSocial vs GovPilot
- ArchiveSocial vs mySidewalk
- ArchiveSocial vs Periscope Holdings
- ArchiveSocial vs Axon Records
- ArchiveSocial vs DataSF
- ArchiveSocial vs Google Cloud for Government
- ArchiveSocial vs iCompass
- ArchiveSocial vs Mapbox Government
- ArchiveSocial vs GovQA
- ArchiveSocial vs Unit21
- ArchiveSocial vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- ArchiveSocial vs Feedzai
- ArchiveSocial vs NICE Actimize
- ArchiveSocial vs Socure
- ArchiveSocial vs ThetaRay
- ArchiveSocial vs Transmit Security
- ArchiveSocial vs Jumio
- ArchiveSocial vs iDenfy
- ArchiveSocial vs Silent Eight
- ArchiveSocial vs Sumsub
- ArchiveSocial vs Quantexa
- ArchiveSocial vs TunnelBear
- ArchiveSocial vs Vanta
- ArchiveSocial vs Acunetix
- ArchiveSocial vs Aikido
- ArchiveSocial vs Arnica
- ArchiveSocial vs Authelia
- Sardine vs NextRequest
- Sardine vs Granicus
- Sardine vs Zencity
- Sardine vs Bonfire
- Sardine vs NEOGOV
- Sardine vs AWS GovCloud
- Sardine vs Clariti
- Sardine vs GovPilot
- Sardine vs mySidewalk
- Sardine vs Periscope Holdings
- Sardine vs Axon Records
- Sardine vs DataSF
- Sardine vs Google Cloud for Government
- Sardine vs iCompass
- Sardine vs Mapbox Government
- Sardine vs GovQA
- Sardine vs Unit21
- Sardine vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Sardine vs Feedzai
- Sardine vs NICE Actimize
- Sardine vs Socure
- Sardine vs ThetaRay
- Sardine vs Transmit Security
- Sardine vs Jumio
- Sardine vs iDenfy
- Sardine vs Silent Eight
- Sardine vs Sumsub
- Sardine vs Quantexa
- Sardine vs TunnelBear
- Sardine vs Vanta
- Sardine vs Acunetix
- Sardine vs Aikido
- Sardine vs Arnica
- Sardine vs Authelia
