Technology · head to head
Safari vs Okta

Safari
Technology
Apple's WebKit browser, available only on Apple operating systems and updated only with them.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Safari it runs only on Apple operating systems; there has been no Windows build since 2012 and none for Linux or Android, so any team that must verify Safari behaviour has to buy Mac hardware or rent it from a device cloud, which is a line item Chrome and Firefox do not create.; Okta requires $1,500 annual minimum contract
- They diverge on capability: Safari covers WebKit engine, Okta covers Single sign-on (SSO).
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Safari and Okta actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Technology).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Safari
- WebKit engine
- Intelligent Tracking Prevention
- Energy optimisation
- iCloud Private Relay
- Passkeys in iCloud Keychain
- Handoff and tab sync
- Profiles and Tab Groups
- Web Inspector
Only in Okta
- Single sign-on (SSO)
- Multi-factor authentication
- Lifecycle management
- Universal directory
- API access management
- B2B integration
- Passwordless authentication
- Adaptive MFA
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Safari
- Getting the longest battery life out of a MacBook, where the difference against Chromium browsers is hours rather than minutesnot Okta
- Debugging a site on a real iPhone or iPad, which requires Safari's Web Inspector connected over USB from a Macnot Okta
- An all-Apple household or team that wants tabs, passwords and passkeys to follow them across devices without a third-party accountnot Okta
- Privacy-conscious users on iCloud+ who want tracking protection and Private Relay working by default rather than through extensionsnot Okta
Okta
- Employee SSOnot Safari
- Customer identitynot Safari
- B2B integrationnot Safari
- Zero Trust securitynot Safari
- Compliancenot Safari
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Safari
- It runs only on Apple operating systems; there has been no Windows build since 2012 and none for Linux or Android, so any team that must verify Safari behaviour has to buy Mac hardware or rent it from a device cloud, which is a line item Chrome and Firefox do not create.
- Safari's version is bound to the operating system's version, so a Mac that has fallen off the supported macOS list stops receiving Safari updates altogether; the browser's security life is the machine's OS life, roughly three years of updates after the last major release it can run.
- Distributing an extension means packaging it inside a signed macOS application and shipping it through the App Store with a paid Apple Developer Program membership, which makes a small internal or single-team extension impractical.
- Automated testing uses safaridriver, which runs on macOS only, has no headless mode and permits one session per machine, so Safari coverage in CI means real Macs in the pipeline rather than containers, and it does not parallelise the way Chromium does.
- Web platform features generally land in WebKit later than in Blink and Gecko, so Safari's current support is in practice the compatibility floor for any project, and a feature you can use everywhere else may be a year away here.
- Enterprise management is thin: configuration profiles cover a modest set of settings with nothing comparable to the several hundred administrative policies Chrome and Edge expose, so a managed fleet cannot control Safari to the same degree.
Okta
- Requires $1,500 annual minimum contract
- Admin-only MFA can be vulnerable to push notification fatigue attacks
- Implementation requires significant services and integration fees in year one
Pricing, plan by plan
Safari
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Safari review.
Okta
Free- Starter Suite$6/user/month
- SSO
- MFA
- Universal Directory
- Core Essentials Suite$14/user/month
- Adaptive MFA
- Privileged Access
- Lifecycle Management
- Essentials Suite$17/user/month
- Same as Core Essentials
- Most popular
- Professional Suite$undefined/custom
- Device Access
- Identity Security Posture
- Threat Protection
Which should you pick?
Choose Safari if
- You need webkit engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want intelligent tracking prevention.
Choose Okta if
- You need single sign-on (sso).
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, SaaS.
- You also want multi-factor authentication.
Questions people ask
- Is Safari or Okta better?
- Neither clearly leads. Safari starts at Free and Okta at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Safari or Okta?
- Safari starts at Free and Okta at Free.
- Does Safari or Okta run on more platforms?
- Safari runs on Web. Okta runs on Web, SaaS.
- Can I use Safari for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Safari best used for?
- Safari is most often used for getting the longest battery life out of a macbook, where the difference against chromium browsers is hours rather than minutes, debugging a site on a real iphone or ipad, which requires safari's web inspector connected over usb from a mac, an all-apple household or team that wants tabs, passwords and passkeys to follow them across devices without a third-party account, privacy-conscious users on icloud+ who want tracking protection and private relay working by default rather than through extensions. Of those, getting the longest battery life out of a macbook, where the difference against chromium browsers is hours rather than minutes and debugging a site on a real iphone or ipad, which requires safari's web inspector connected over usb from a mac are not what Okta is typically brought in for.
- What can Safari do that Okta cannot?
- Safari covers WebKit engine, Intelligent Tracking Prevention, Energy optimisation, iCloud Private Relay. Okta covers Single sign-on (SSO), Multi-factor authentication, Lifecycle management, Universal directory.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Safari: Can I run Safari on Windows or Linux?
No. The last Windows version was Safari 5.1.7 in 2012 and it is long unsupported. There has never been a Linux build. Testing Safari requires macOS, either your own or a rented cloud device.
Okta: What is the minimum contract for Okta Workforce Identity?
Okta requires a $1,500 annual minimum contract for Workforce Identity plans. Pricing starts at $6 per user per month (Starter) and ranges to $17 per user per month (Essentials), billed annually.
SourceSafari: How do I test my site in Safari without a Mac?
Through a cloud device farm such as BrowserStack, Sauce Labs or LambdaTest, which run real macOS and iOS instances. There is no reliable local emulation, because other browsers on Windows and Linux do not use WebKit.
Okta: Does Okta offer a free trial?
Yes, Okta provides a 30-day free trial so customers can explore all product capabilities before committing to a paid plan.
SourceSafari: Are other iPhone browsers really different from Safari?
Historically no: Apple required all iOS browsers to use WebKit, so Chrome and Firefox on iPhone were interface shells around Safari's engine. The EU's Digital Markets Act now permits alternative engines, but adoption is limited, so in practice iOS testing still means WebKit.
Okta: How many pre-built integrations does Okta support?
Okta offers over 7,000 pre-built integrations with popular enterprise applications including Salesforce, Slack, Workday, Box, Confluence, and Zendesk.
SourceSafari: Why does Safari not get a new version on my old Mac?
Safari ships with the operating system. When a Mac can no longer run a macOS version that Apple still updates, Safari stops updating too, including its security fixes.
Okta: What security features does Okta provide for admins?
Okta provides multi-factor authentication, adaptive MFA, single logout, and identity threat detection and response. However, only 94% of Okta customers have MFA enabled for administrators.
SourceSafari: What does it cost?
Nothing. It is included with Apple operating systems. Private Relay requires an iCloud+ subscription, and publishing an extension requires a paid Apple Developer Program membership.
Okta: Can Okta integrate with on-premises directories?
Yes, Okta's Universal Directory and lifecycle management support cloud and on-premises identity sources, including Active Directory and LDAP.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Safari vs Microsoft Edge
- Safari vs Mozilla Firefox
- Safari vs Google Chrome
- Safari vs Trino
- Safari vs Apache Spark
- Safari vs GitHub Desktop
- Safari vs ClickUp
- Safari vs Intercom
- Safari vs Monday.com
- Safari vs Maze
- Safari vs PyCharm
- Safari vs MongoDB
- Safari vs Nagios XI
- Safari vs Postgres
- Safari vs Shortcut
- Safari vs Site24x7
- Safari vs Microsoft Outlook
- Safari vs MongoDB Atlas
- Safari vs Dashlane
- Safari vs Aha!
- Safari vs Eclipse
- Safari vs Datadog
- Safari vs Greenhouse
- Safari vs GitLab
- Safari vs RescueTime
- Safari vs Asana
- Safari vs Amplitude
- Safari vs LaunchDarkly
- Safari vs Finxact
- Safari vs GitHub
- Safari vs Heap
- Safari vs Netlify
- Safari vs Productboard
- Okta vs Microsoft Edge
- Okta vs Mozilla Firefox
- Okta vs Google Chrome
- Okta vs Trino
- Okta vs Apache Spark
- Okta vs GitHub Desktop
- Okta vs ClickUp
- Okta vs Intercom
- Okta vs Monday.com
- Okta vs Maze
- Okta vs PyCharm
- Okta vs MongoDB
- Okta vs Nagios XI
- Okta vs Postgres
- Okta vs Shortcut
- Okta vs Site24x7
- Okta vs Microsoft Outlook
- Okta vs MongoDB Atlas
- Okta vs Dashlane
- Okta vs Aha!
- Okta vs Eclipse
- Okta vs Datadog
- Okta vs Greenhouse
- Okta vs GitLab
- Okta vs RescueTime
- Okta vs Asana
- Okta vs Amplitude
- Okta vs LaunchDarkly
- Okta vs Finxact
- Okta vs GitHub
- Okta vs Heap
- Okta vs Netlify
- Okta vs Productboard

