Databases · head to head
Apache Solr vs Kong

Apache Solr
Databases
Enterprise search platform built on Apache Lucene
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Apache Solr xML-heavy configuration and a developer experience that feels dated beside newer engines; Kong the Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million
- They diverge on capability: Apache Solr covers Lucene-based indexing, Kong covers API Gateway.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apache Solr and Kong actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apache Solr | Kong |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | subscription |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes |
| Category | Databases | APIs |
| Founded | Unknown | 2010 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apache Solr
- Lucene-based indexing
- Faceted search
- SolrCloud
- Schema control
Only in Kong
- API Gateway
- Authentication & Authorization
- Rate Limiting
- Kubernetes
- Consul
- Eureka
- PostgreSQL
- Linux support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apache Solr
- Library, archive and catalogue search where faceting is centralnot Kong
- Long-lived enterprise deployments valuing stability over noveltynot Kong
- Search requiring precise, explicitly configured relevance tuningnot Kong
Kong
- API gateway management and routingnot Apache Solr
- API development and testingnot Apache Solr
- Enterprise API security and governancenot Apache Solr
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apache Solr
- XML-heavy configuration and a developer experience that feels dated beside newer engines
- SolrCloud depends on ZooKeeper, adding a component Elasticsearch removed years ago
- Smaller mindshare now, so newer tutorials, hiring and integrations favour Elasticsearch
- Considerably heavier than a purpose-built application search engine
Kong
- The Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million
- Plus is capped at 10M requests a month, so growth past that forces an Enterprise contract
- Plus limits published APIs to 20 and includes one Developer Portal, with a second at $200 a month
- SSO and audit logging are Enterprise only
- Enterprise pricing is custom and billed annually
Pricing, plan by plan
Apache Solr
Free- Apache SolrFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Kong
Free- Kong Konnect Free TrialFree
- 30-day free trial
- Full enterprise functionality
- Unlimited gateways
- Kong Konnect Plus$null/month
- Per gateway pricing billed monthly
- Up to 5 Serverless Gateways, 2 Hybrid, 2 Dedicated Cloud Gateways
- 1M API requests included per month
- Kong Insomnia EssentialsFree
- Unlimited projects and CLI access
- Up to 3 Git Sync users
- 1,000 mock server requests per month
- Kong Insomnia Pro$12/month
- Unlimited users with Git Sync access
- Unlimited organizations
- RBAC
Which should you pick?
Choose Apache Solr if
- You need lucene-based indexing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want faceted search.
Choose Kong if
- You need api gateway.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want authentication & authorization.
Questions people ask
- Is Apache Solr or Kong better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apache Solr starts at Free and Kong at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apache Solr or Kong?
- Apache Solr starts at Free and Kong at Free.
- Does Apache Solr or Kong run on more platforms?
- Apache Solr runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted. Kong runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Apache Solr for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Apache Solr best used for?
- Apache Solr is most often used for library, archive and catalogue search where faceting is central, long-lived enterprise deployments valuing stability over novelty, search requiring precise, explicitly configured relevance tuning. Of those, library, archive and catalogue search where faceting is central and long-lived enterprise deployments valuing stability over novelty are not what Kong is typically brought in for.
- What can Apache Solr do that Kong cannot?
- Apache Solr covers Lucene-based indexing, Faceted search, SolrCloud, Schema control. Kong covers API Gateway, Authentication & Authorization, Rate Limiting, Kubernetes.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apache Solr: Is Apache Solr free?
Yes, open source under the Apache Software Foundation.
Kong: Does Kong offer a free trial?
Yes, Kong Konnect offers a 30-day free trial with full enterprise functionality, unlimited gateways, and no credit card required.
SourceApache Solr: Solr or Elasticsearch?
Both are built on Lucene. Elasticsearch has the larger ecosystem and a friendlier API; Solr is very mature and strong on faceted search, and remains common in library and catalogue systems.
Kong: How much does Kong Insomnia Pro cost?
Kong Insomnia Pro is $12 per user per month with 15% savings available for annual billing.
SourceApache Solr: Is Solr still maintained?
Yes, actively, as a top-level Apache project.
Kong: What are Kong Konnect Plus API request limits?
Kong Konnect Plus includes 1M API requests per month; additional requests cost $200 per 1M (maximum 10M per month).
SourceKong: What is included in Kong Insomnia Enterprise?
Kong Insomnia Enterprise is $45 per user per month with SSO, SCIM, vault integrations, unlimited mock server requests, and Konnect integration.
SourceRelated pages
More on Apache Solr
Other head to heads
- Apache Solr vs Meilisearch
- Apache Solr vs OpenSearch
- Apache Solr vs Elasticsearch
- Apache Solr vs PostgreSQL
- Apache Solr vs Typesense
- Apache Solr vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Apache Solr vs Solace PubSub+
- Apache Solr vs RabbitMQ
- Apache Solr vs Couchbase
- Apache Solr vs MariaDB
- Apache Solr vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Apache Solr vs IBM Db2
- Apache Solr vs Marqo
- Apache Solr vs Nile
- Apache Solr vs Ninox
- Apache Solr vs Presto
- Apache Solr vs Privacera
- Apache Solr vs RavenDB
- Apache Solr vs Convoy
- Apache Solr vs PocketBase
- Apache Solr vs Appwrite
- Apache Solr vs Hasura
- Apache Solr vs Sanity
- Apache Solr vs Tyk
- Apache Solr vs WSO2 API Manager
- Apache Solr vs Gravitee
- Apache Solr vs Janus Gateway
- Apache Solr vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Apache Solr vs 3scale
- Apache Solr vs Akana
- Apache Solr vs Enable Banking
- Apache Solr vs Flybits
- Apache Solr vs i2c
- Apache Solr vs KeystoneJS
- Apache Solr vs Liveblocks
- Apache Solr vs Moesif
- Kong vs Meilisearch
- Kong vs OpenSearch
- Kong vs Elasticsearch
- Kong vs PostgreSQL
- Kong vs Typesense
- Kong vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Kong vs Solace PubSub+
- Kong vs RabbitMQ
- Kong vs Couchbase
- Kong vs MariaDB
- Kong vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Kong vs IBM Db2
- Kong vs Marqo
- Kong vs Nile
- Kong vs Ninox
- Kong vs Presto
- Kong vs Privacera
- Kong vs RavenDB
- Kong vs Convoy
- Kong vs PocketBase
- Kong vs Appwrite
- Kong vs Hasura
- Kong vs Sanity
- Kong vs Tyk
- Kong vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong vs Gravitee
- Kong vs Janus Gateway
- Kong vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Kong vs 3scale
- Kong vs Akana
- Kong vs Enable Banking
- Kong vs Flybits
- Kong vs i2c
- Kong vs KeystoneJS
- Kong vs Liveblocks
- Kong vs Moesif

