ERP · head to head
iDempiere vs QAD

iDempiere
ERP
Community-governed open source ERP, CRM and supply chain built on Java, OSGi and PostgreSQL
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only iDempiere has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: iDempiere there is no vendor, so there is no support contract, no service level agreement and nobody to escalate to; you either build the skills internally or you depend entirely on a local partner whose quality you must judge yourself.; QAD no price, per user rate, minimum or contract term is published on the site; the only routes are a demo request and a Contact Sales link
- They diverge on capability: iDempiere covers Application dictionary, QAD covers Financial management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which iDempiere and QAD actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (ERP).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in iDempiere
- Application dictionary
- OSGi plug-in architecture
- Multi-organisation accounting
- Materials management
- Workflow engine
- Report and print engine
- No paid edition
Only in QAD
- Financial management
- Supply chain
- Inventory management
- Quality management
- REST APIs
- EDI
- IoT integration
- Third-party systems
Both cover
- Manufacturing
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
iDempiere
- A distributor wants multi-organisation, multi-currency accounting and warehouse costing without a per-user ERP licence that scales with headcount.not QAD
- An organisation that has been caught by an open core vendor moving features into a paid tier wants an ERP with no company that can make that decision.not QAD
- A team needs heavy customisation of screens, fields and approval workflows that must survive version upgrades, which the application dictionary makes possible without forking.not QAD
- A public sector or university body in Latin America or Indonesia needs a locally supportable ERP where the source and the implementation skills are both available in-country.not QAD
QAD
- ERP for manufacturers covering production execution and schedulingnot iDempiere
- Supply chain planning, purchasing and inventory controlnot iDempiere
- Quality management, traceability and supplier management for regulated manufacturingnot iDempiere
- Field service and enterprise asset managementnot iDempiere
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
iDempiere
- There is no vendor, so there is no support contract, no service level agreement and nobody to escalate to; you either build the skills internally or you depend entirely on a local partner whose quality you must judge yourself.
- It demands real Java, OSGi and PostgreSQL administration, so the running cost is a systems engineer rather than a subscription, and that engineer is harder to hire than a PHP developer.
- The ZK-based interface is dense and dated, with a data-entry feel inherited from Compiere that staff used to modern software find hostile, which drives up training cost.
- Localisation depends on community contribution, so tax, payroll and statutory reporting for your country may be absent, out of date or maintained by one person, and you may end up funding it yourself.
- The documentation is a community wiki with gaps and stale pages, and much of the practical knowledge sits in forum threads and partner heads rather than in anything you can hand to a new administrator.
QAD
- No price, per user rate, minimum or contract term is published on the site; the only routes are a demo request and a Contact Sales link
- Field service management, enterprise asset management and quality management are presented as separate functional areas rather than a single priced bundle
Pricing, plan by plan
iDempiere
Free- iDempiereFree
- Full ERP, CRM and supply chain source
- Unlimited users and organisations
- No enterprise edition and no feature gating
- Implementation partner$undefined/year
- Local partners provide installation, configuration, training and support
- Priced per engagement, not published
- Realistically the only viable route for a production deployment
QAD
$2000/month- Standard$2000/month
- Financial management
- Manufacturing
- Supply chain
- Premium$4000/month
- Advanced modules
- Analytics
- Priority support
Which should you pick?
Choose iDempiere if
- You need application dictionary.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted, Docker, Linux, Windows.
- You also want osgi plug-in architecture.
Choose QAD if
- You need financial management.
- You work on Cloud, On-premise, Web.
- You also want supply chain.
Questions people ask
- Is iDempiere or QAD better?
- Neither clearly leads. iDempiere starts at Free and QAD at $2000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, iDempiere or QAD?
- iDempiere has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for iDempiere and $2000/month for QAD.
- Does iDempiere or QAD run on more platforms?
- iDempiere runs on Web, Self-hosted, Docker, Linux, Windows. QAD runs on Cloud, On-premise, Web.
- Can I use iDempiere for free?
- Yes. iDempiere has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. QAD starts at $2000/month.
- What is iDempiere best used for?
- iDempiere is most often used for a distributor wants multi-organisation, multi-currency accounting and warehouse costing without a per-user erp licence that scales with headcount., an organisation that has been caught by an open core vendor moving features into a paid tier wants an erp with no company that can make that decision., a team needs heavy customisation of screens, fields and approval workflows that must survive version upgrades, which the application dictionary makes possible without forking., a public sector or university body in latin america or indonesia needs a locally supportable erp where the source and the implementation skills are both available in-country.. Of those, a distributor wants multi-organisation, multi-currency accounting and warehouse costing without a per-user erp licence that scales with headcount. and an organisation that has been caught by an open core vendor moving features into a paid tier wants an erp with no company that can make that decision. are not what QAD is typically brought in for.
- What can iDempiere do that QAD cannot?
- iDempiere covers Application dictionary, OSGi plug-in architecture, Multi-organisation accounting, Materials management. QAD covers Financial management, Supply chain, Inventory management, Quality management. Both handle Manufacturing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
iDempiere: Is iDempiere the same as ADempiere or Compiere?
It shares the lineage. iDempiere forked from ADempiere in 2011 to rebuild the platform on OSGi, and it is the branch that remains actively developed.
QAD: How can I get pricing information for QAD manufacturing software?
QAD does not publish standard pricing on their homepage. Pricing discussions occur during personalized consultations. Interested parties can request a demo, contact the sales team, or download brochures to discuss pricing based on specific organizational needs.
SourceiDempiere: Is there a paid or enterprise edition?
No. There is no commercial owner and no feature gating. Money is spent on implementation partners and hosting, not on licences.
QAD: What deployment options does QAD offer?
QAD provides adaptive ERP solutions for various industries including Automotive, Food & Beverage, and Life Sciences. Their offerings include connected workforce solutions and supply chain management, with implementation and advisory services available.
SourceiDempiere: What does it actually cost to run?
Nothing in licence fees, and a great deal in skills: expect a partner implementation and ongoing Java and PostgreSQL administration, which for a mid-sized company is comparable to a commercial subscription.
QAD: Is there a trial available for QAD software without contacting sales?
The QAD homepage does not mention a free trial or self-serve trial option. The primary engagement path is through "Request a Demo" or "Contact Sales" buttons, suggesting trial access requires sales team interaction.
SourceiDempiere: Which database does it need?
PostgreSQL or Oracle. PostgreSQL is the mainstream community choice and the one most partners deploy.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- iDempiere vs OpenBravo
- iDempiere vs Metasfresh
- iDempiere vs Apache OFBiz
- iDempiere vs ADempiere
- iDempiere vs Tryton
- iDempiere vs SYSPRO
- iDempiere vs Aptean
- iDempiere vs Axelor
- iDempiere vs Dolibarr
- iDempiere vs QAD Adaptive ERP
- iDempiere vs Epicor
- iDempiere vs Rootstock
- iDempiere vs Sage X3
- iDempiere vs BatchMaster
- iDempiere vs DEAR Systems
- iDempiere vs Fishbowl
- iDempiere vs Infor CloudSuite
- iDempiere vs MRPeasy
- iDempiere vs Global Shop Solutions
- iDempiere vs Katana MRP
- iDempiere vs IFS Cloud
- iDempiere vs Unit4
- iDempiere vs Visibility
- iDempiere vs Yonyou
- iDempiere vs Ivalua
- iDempiere vs Zip
- iDempiere vs GEP SMART
- QAD vs OpenBravo
- QAD vs Metasfresh
- QAD vs Apache OFBiz
- QAD vs ADempiere
- QAD vs Tryton
- QAD vs SYSPRO
- QAD vs Aptean
- QAD vs Axelor
- QAD vs Dolibarr
- QAD vs QAD Adaptive ERP
- QAD vs Epicor
- QAD vs Rootstock
- QAD vs Sage X3
- QAD vs BatchMaster
- QAD vs DEAR Systems
- QAD vs Fishbowl
- QAD vs Infor CloudSuite
- QAD vs MRPeasy
- QAD vs Global Shop Solutions
- QAD vs Katana MRP
- QAD vs IFS Cloud
- QAD vs Unit4
- QAD vs Visibility
- QAD vs Yonyou
- QAD vs Ivalua
- QAD vs Zip
- QAD vs GEP SMART

