Aviation · head to head
AMOS vs Lockheed Martin Prepar3D

AMOS
Aviation
Aviation maintenance and engineering management software
- From
- $50000/year
- Rated
- -

Lockheed Martin Prepar3D
Aviation
Professional-grade flight simulation and training platform
- From
- $9.99/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: AMOS pricing is by quote only, with no rate, minimum or named cost driver published; the routes to a price are ordering a brochure or booking a live demo through a contact form; Lockheed Martin Prepar3D high system resource requirements with 85 GB base installation and 32 GB RAM recommended
- They diverge on capability: AMOS covers Maintenance planning, Lockheed Martin Prepar3D covers Flight simulation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which AMOS and Lockheed Martin Prepar3D actually diverge.
| Attribute | AMOS | Lockheed Martin Prepar3D |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $50000/year | $9.99/month |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, Ios, Android | Windows, Vr |
| Founded | 1997 | 2010 |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Aviation).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in AMOS
- Maintenance planning
- Work order management
- Inventory management
- Airworthiness tracking
- Technical records
- SAP
- Oracle
- Flight operations systems
Only in Lockheed Martin Prepar3D
- Flight simulation
- Aircraft systems
- Realistic physics
- Training scenarios
- Performance analysis
- Hardware controllers
- VR systems
- Motion platforms
Both cover
- Data encryption
- Role-based access
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
AMOS
- Running aircraft maintenance, engineering and logistics for an airline in one systemnot Lockheed Martin Prepar3D
- MRO providers managing maintenance execution across mixed fleetsnot Lockheed Martin Prepar3D
- Configuring maintenance programmes for different operators, fleets and business modelsnot Lockheed Martin Prepar3D
Lockheed Martin Prepar3D
- Pilot trainingnot AMOS
- Type rating trainingnot AMOS
- Proficiency maintenancenot AMOS
- Scenario trainingnot AMOS
- Aircraft developmentnot AMOS
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
AMOS
- Pricing is by quote only, with no rate, minimum or named cost driver published; the routes to a price are ordering a brochure or booking a live demo through a contact form
- Hosting is a separately named service, AMOScloud Hosting, rather than a standard part of the licence
Lockheed Martin Prepar3D
- High system resource requirements with 85 GB base installation and 32 GB RAM recommended
- Expensive Professional and Professional Plus licenses for commercial and business use
- Limited backward compatibility with older 32-bit aircraft modules
- SimDirector scenario creation tool requires programming knowledge for advanced customization
Pricing, plan by plan
AMOS
$50000/year- AMOS Standard$50000/year
- Maintenance planning
- Work order management
- Materials management
- AMOS Enterprise$100000/year
- Multi-base operations
- Advanced analytics
- API integrations
Lockheed Martin Prepar3D
$9.99/month- Standard$9.99/month
- Flight simulation
- Basic aircraft
- Training tools
- Professional$99.99/month
- Advanced simulation
- Full aircraft systems
- Advanced training
Which should you pick?
Choose AMOS if
- You need maintenance planning.
- You work on Web, Windows, Ios, Android.
- You also want work order management.
Choose Lockheed Martin Prepar3D if
- You need flight simulation.
- You work on Windows, Vr.
- You also want aircraft systems.
Questions people ask
- Is AMOS or Lockheed Martin Prepar3D better?
- Neither clearly leads. AMOS starts at $50000/year and Lockheed Martin Prepar3D at $9.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, AMOS or Lockheed Martin Prepar3D?
- AMOS starts at $50000/year and Lockheed Martin Prepar3D at $9.99/month.
- Does AMOS or Lockheed Martin Prepar3D run on more platforms?
- AMOS runs on Web, Windows, Ios, Android. Lockheed Martin Prepar3D runs on Windows, Vr.
- What is AMOS best used for?
- AMOS is most often used for running aircraft maintenance, engineering and logistics for an airline in one system, mro providers managing maintenance execution across mixed fleets, configuring maintenance programmes for different operators, fleets and business models. Of those, running aircraft maintenance, engineering and logistics for an airline in one system and mro providers managing maintenance execution across mixed fleets are not what Lockheed Martin Prepar3D is typically brought in for.
- What can AMOS do that Lockheed Martin Prepar3D cannot?
- AMOS covers Maintenance planning, Work order management, Inventory management, Airworthiness tracking. Lockheed Martin Prepar3D covers Flight simulation, Aircraft systems, Realistic physics, Training scenarios. Both handle Data encryption, Role-based access, Windows support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
AMOS: Does Swissair Solutions publish AMOS pricing online?
No, AMOS pricing is not disclosed on the website. The site focuses on product features and benefits for aircraft maintenance management.
SourceLockheed Martin Prepar3D: What are the license options for Prepar3D?
Prepar3D offers three license tiers: Personal ($59.95) for personal training and K-12 education, Professional ($350) for professional pilot training and commercial uses, and Professional Plus ($2,750) for businesses with advanced features. Developer monthly licenses are available at $9.99 and $50 for Professional and Professional Plus respectively.
SourceAMOS: How do I get pricing information for AMOS?
To obtain pricing, interested parties can order an AMOS brochure or request a live demo through the contact options on the website.
SourceLockheed Martin Prepar3D: What are the system requirements?
Prepar3D v6 requires approximately 85 GB storage, 32 GB RAM or more for optimal performance, 8 GB or more VRAM, and a DX12-capable GPU with 64-bit architecture. Detailed scenery and aircraft add-ons can significantly increase storage and performance requirements.
SourceLockheed Martin Prepar3D: Can I create custom training scenarios?
Yes. Prepar3D includes SimDirector, a scenario generation tool that allows users to create training scenarios across aviation, maritime, and ground domains. Users can place world objects, define scenario logic, create missions, and provide instruction sessions, making it suitable for cockpit training, flight planning, and emergency response preparation.
SourceLockheed Martin Prepar3D: Is Prepar3D compatible with third-party add-ons?
Prepar3D v5 and v6 maintain compatibility with many Microsoft Flight Simulator X add-ons. However, 32-bit aircraft modules are not compatible with 64-bit Prepar3D versions, and third-party add-ons must be updated for the specific Prepar3D version being used.
SourceRelated pages
More on Lockheed Martin Prepar3D
Other head to heads
- AMOS vs Ramco Aviation Suite
- AMOS vs DJI FlightHub 2
- AMOS vs CAE Flight Training
- AMOS vs Flightradar24
- AMOS vs Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024
- AMOS vs X-Plane 12
- AMOS vs Boeing Aviator
- AMOS vs Collins Aerospace Systems
- AMOS vs Honeywell Aerospace Systems
- AMOS vs L3Harris Technologies Aviation
- AMOS vs Leonardo Aerospace Systems
- AMOS vs Safelog Pilot Logbook
- AMOS vs Lido Flight Planning
- AMOS vs LogTen Pro
- AMOS vs NAVBLUE N-Flight Planning
- AMOS vs AviaSIM Pro
- AMOS vs Prepar3D Professional
- AMOS vs CloudAhoy
- AMOS vs PFPX Flight Planning
- AMOS vs simBrief
- AMOS vs FlightSafety International Training
- AMOS vs AGI STK
- AMOS vs SITA Airport Management
- AMOS vs SkyVector
- AMOS vs SpaceX Starlink Aviation
- AMOS vs WingX Pro
- Lockheed Martin Prepar3D vs Ramco Aviation Suite
- Lockheed Martin Prepar3D vs DJI FlightHub 2
- Lockheed Martin Prepar3D vs CAE Flight Training
- Lockheed Martin Prepar3D vs Flightradar24
- Lockheed Martin Prepar3D vs Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024
- Lockheed Martin Prepar3D vs X-Plane 12
- Lockheed Martin Prepar3D vs Boeing Aviator
- Lockheed Martin Prepar3D vs Collins Aerospace Systems
- Lockheed Martin Prepar3D vs Honeywell Aerospace Systems
- Lockheed Martin Prepar3D vs L3Harris Technologies Aviation
- Lockheed Martin Prepar3D vs Leonardo Aerospace Systems
- Lockheed Martin Prepar3D vs Safelog Pilot Logbook
- Lockheed Martin Prepar3D vs Lido Flight Planning
- Lockheed Martin Prepar3D vs LogTen Pro
- Lockheed Martin Prepar3D vs NAVBLUE N-Flight Planning
- Lockheed Martin Prepar3D vs AviaSIM Pro
- Lockheed Martin Prepar3D vs Prepar3D Professional
- Lockheed Martin Prepar3D vs CloudAhoy
- Lockheed Martin Prepar3D vs PFPX Flight Planning
- Lockheed Martin Prepar3D vs simBrief
- Lockheed Martin Prepar3D vs FlightSafety International Training
- Lockheed Martin Prepar3D vs AGI STK
- Lockheed Martin Prepar3D vs SITA Airport Management
- Lockheed Martin Prepar3D vs SkyVector
- Lockheed Martin Prepar3D vs SpaceX Starlink Aviation
- Lockheed Martin Prepar3D vs WingX Pro
