Maps · head to head
SW Maps vs Trailforks

SW Maps
Maps
Free Android GIS data collector that pairs with external RTK GNSS receivers
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Trailforks
Maps
Mountain-bike-specific trail database and navigation app owned by Outside Inc
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: SW Maps android only. There is no iOS version and no sign of one, which rules it out for organisations that issue iPhones and iPads to field staff.; Trailforks the free tier only allows one offline region downloaded at a time, which is limiting for a rider visiting multiple trail areas.
- They diverge on capability: SW Maps covers Custom feature layers, Trailforks covers Mountain bike trail database.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which SW Maps and Trailforks actually diverge.
| Attribute | SW Maps | Trailforks |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | Freemium, standalone Pro or bundled with Outside+ |
| Platforms | Android | iOS, Android, Web |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in SW Maps
- Custom feature layers
- External GNSS support
- Offline basemaps
- Geospatial PDF layers
- Vector import
- Photo and media capture
- Export formats
- NTRIP client
Only in Trailforks
- Mountain bike trail database
- Community trail reports
- Offline maps
- Premium basemaps
- Heatmap overlay
- Weather and fire overlays
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
SW Maps
- An NGO or municipal utility mapping water points, pipe networks or road assets on a budget that cannot absorb per-user GIS subscriptionsnot Trailforks
- A survey team pairing a low-cost RTK receiver with Android tablets to collect centimetre-accurate attributed features without buying field software seatsnot Trailforks
- A university field course teaching GNSS data collection where every student needs the tool on their own devicenot Trailforks
- A consultant doing a one-off asset inventory who needs shapefile or GeoPackage output and does not want to start an annual subscription for a three-week jobnot Trailforks
Trailforks
- A mountain biker planning a ride on unfamiliar singletrack who needs direction-of-travel and difficulty datanot SW Maps
- Someone riding in an area with no signal who needs an offline downloaded trail mapnot SW Maps
- A rider checking recent community trail condition reports before heading outnot SW Maps
- Someone comparing several mountain bike regions using the usage heatmap before choosing where to ridenot SW Maps
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
SW Maps
- Android only. There is no iOS version and no sign of one, which rules it out for organisations that issue iPhones and iPads to field staff.
- There is no back end: no user management, no central project sync, no audit trail. Data lives on the device until someone exports it, and a lost tablet is lost data.
- No commercial support contract exists, so an organisation with a compliance requirement for vendor support cannot use it for regulated work regardless of technical fit.
- It is maintained by a small consultancy as a side product of its own project work, so the roadmap follows Softwel’s needs and a feature you depend on may never be prioritised.
- Form logic is basic compared with dedicated survey platforms: no meaningful skip logic, validation or multi-user assignment, so complex questionnaires quickly outgrow it.
Trailforks
- The free tier only allows one offline region downloaded at a time, which is limiting for a rider visiting multiple trail areas.
- Pro pricing appears to be shifting toward bundling with the wider Outside+ media subscription, making the standalone price less stable and worth checking directly before buying.
- Its focus on mountain biking means it is a weaker choice than Ride with GPS for road or gravel route planning.
- Trail data quality depends on community contribution, so newer or less-ridden regions can have sparse or outdated information.
- Being owned by a media company with a broader outdoor content bundle strategy introduces some uncertainty about how the standalone app product is prioritised long term.
Pricing, plan by plan
SW Maps
Free- SW MapsFree
- All features included
- External RTK GNSS support
- Unlimited layers and exports
Trailforks
Free- Trailforks FreeFree
- Trail database access
- Basic basemaps
- One offline region at a time
- Trailforks Pro$undefined/year
- Unlimited offline regions
- Premium basemaps including Gaia and ArcGIS satellite
- Heatmap, weather and fire overlays
Which should you pick?
Choose SW Maps if
- You need custom feature layers.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Android.
- You also want external gnss support.
Choose Trailforks if
- You need mountain bike trail database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want community trail reports.
Questions people ask
- Is SW Maps or Trailforks better?
- Neither clearly leads. SW Maps starts at Free and Trailforks at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, SW Maps or Trailforks?
- SW Maps starts at Free and Trailforks at Free.
- Does SW Maps or Trailforks run on more platforms?
- SW Maps runs on Android. Trailforks runs on iOS, Android, Web.
- Can I use SW Maps for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is SW Maps best used for?
- SW Maps is most often used for an ngo or municipal utility mapping water points, pipe networks or road assets on a budget that cannot absorb per-user gis subscriptions, a survey team pairing a low-cost rtk receiver with android tablets to collect centimetre-accurate attributed features without buying field software seats, a university field course teaching gnss data collection where every student needs the tool on their own device, a consultant doing a one-off asset inventory who needs shapefile or geopackage output and does not want to start an annual subscription for a three-week job. Of those, an ngo or municipal utility mapping water points, pipe networks or road assets on a budget that cannot absorb per-user gis subscriptions and a survey team pairing a low-cost rtk receiver with android tablets to collect centimetre-accurate attributed features without buying field software seats are not what Trailforks is typically brought in for.
- What can SW Maps do that Trailforks cannot?
- SW Maps covers Custom feature layers, External GNSS support, Offline basemaps, Geospatial PDF layers. Trailforks covers Mountain bike trail database, Community trail reports, Offline maps, Premium basemaps.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
SW Maps: Is SW Maps really free?
Yes. It is free with no advertising and no paid tier. There is no subscription and no feature paywall.
Trailforks: Is Trailforks free?
A free tier exists with trail data and one offline region at a time; Pro removes that limit and adds premium map layers.
SW Maps: Does it support RTK receivers?
Yes, over Bluetooth or USB serial, with NTRIP correction support, antenna height and per-point fix quality recording.
Trailforks: Who owns Trailforks?
Outside Inc, which also owns Pinkbike and CyclingTips, acquired it in 2021.
SW Maps: Is there an iOS version?
No. Android only.
Trailforks: Is it only for mountain biking?
Mountain biking is the core focus, though it has secondary support for hiking, gravel and motorised trail use.
SW Maps: Who maintains it?
Softwel, an engineering consultancy in Kathmandu, Nepal, which built it for its own infrastructure projects.
SW Maps: Can we get support?
Not contractually. There is no commercial support agreement, which is the main reason organisations with compliance obligations choose a paid alternative.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- SW Maps vs ArcGIS Survey123
- SW Maps vs QGIS
- SW Maps vs Emlid Studio
- SW Maps vs Leica Infinity
- SW Maps vs onX Maps
- SW Maps vs Felt
- SW Maps vs IndoorAtlas
- SW Maps vs Agisoft Metashape
- SW Maps vs Mapbox
- SW Maps vs Google Maps Platform
- SW Maps vs Gaia GPS
- SW Maps vs GraphHopper
- SW Maps vs GRASS GIS
- SW Maps vs HERE WeGo
- SW Maps vs Esri ArcGIS
- SW Maps vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- SW Maps vs Ride with GPS
- SW Maps vs AllTrails
- SW Maps vs Citymapper
- SW Maps vs Google Maps
- SW Maps vs Geographic Calculator
- SW Maps vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- SW Maps vs HERE Technologies
- SW Maps vs Cesium ion
- SW Maps vs Fused
- SW Maps vs Geoapify
- SW Maps vs LocationIQ
- SW Maps vs Lonboard
- SW Maps vs Global Mapper
- Trailforks vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Trailforks vs QGIS
- Trailforks vs Emlid Studio
- Trailforks vs Leica Infinity
- Trailforks vs onX Maps
- Trailforks vs Felt
- Trailforks vs IndoorAtlas
- Trailforks vs Agisoft Metashape
- Trailforks vs Mapbox
- Trailforks vs Google Maps Platform
- Trailforks vs Gaia GPS
- Trailforks vs GraphHopper
- Trailforks vs GRASS GIS
- Trailforks vs HERE WeGo
- Trailforks vs Esri ArcGIS
- Trailforks vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Trailforks vs Ride with GPS
- Trailforks vs AllTrails
- Trailforks vs Citymapper
- Trailforks vs Google Maps
- Trailforks vs Geographic Calculator
- Trailforks vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Trailforks vs HERE Technologies
- Trailforks vs Cesium ion
- Trailforks vs Fused
- Trailforks vs Geoapify
- Trailforks vs LocationIQ
- Trailforks vs Lonboard
- Trailforks vs Global Mapper
