Cybersecurity · head to head
Acunetix vs Bitdefender VPN

Acunetix
Cybersecurity
Web application security testing made easy
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Bitdefender VPN
Cybersecurity
Consumer VPN sold by Bitdefender that runs on network infrastructure licensed from a third party rather than its own.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Acunetix pricing available by quote only; no transparent pricing published online; Bitdefender VPN the network is not Bitdefender's: the servers and the Catapult Hydra protocol are licensed from Aura, formerly Pango and AnchorFree, so the company physically handling your traffic and subject to legal process is a United States based third party, not the Romanian vendor whose brand is on the client.
- They diverge on capability: Acunetix covers DAST scanning, Bitdefender VPN covers Suite integration.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Acunetix and Bitdefender VPN actually diverge.
| Attribute | Acunetix | Bitdefender VPN |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Desktop, Web, Api | Web |
| Founded | 2005 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Acunetix
- DAST scanning
- IAST technology
- AcuSensor
- JavaScript security
- SQL injection testing
- XSS detection
- OWASP Top 10
- API security testing
Only in Bitdefender VPN
- Suite integration
- Catapult Hydra transport
- WireGuard support
- Kill switch
- Auto-connect rules
- Split tunnelling
- Ad and tracker blocking
- Free tier included
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Acunetix
- Scanning web applications for security vulnerabilitiesnot Bitdefender VPN
- Testing APIs for exploitable weaknesses and threatsnot Bitdefender VPN
- Automating dynamic application security testing (DAST)not Bitdefender VPN
- Finding and validating security issues in production environmentsnot Bitdefender VPN
Bitdefender VPN
- An existing Bitdefender customer who wants basic tunnel protection on public Wi-Fi without evaluating and buying a second productnot Acunetix
- Households wanting one security subscription covering malware protection and casual VPN use across a few devicesnot Acunetix
- Hiding browsing activity from an internet service provider or a shared network operator rather than defeating a determined adversarynot Acunetix
- Occasional access to region-locked content where a dedicated streaming-focused VPN would be more product than the need justifiesnot Acunetix
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Acunetix
- Pricing available by quote only; no transparent pricing published online
- Requires per-application licenses for comprehensive coverage
- Scanning speed and feature depth depend on subscription tier
- Advanced features like API security testing may require higher-tier plans
Bitdefender VPN
- The network is not Bitdefender's: the servers and the Catapult Hydra protocol are licensed from Aura, formerly Pango and AnchorFree, so the company physically handling your traffic and subject to legal process is a United States based third party, not the Romanian vendor whose brand is on the client.
- Catapult Hydra is proprietary and closed source, so unlike OpenVPN or WireGuard there is no public implementation for researchers to audit, and a buyer choosing on cryptographic grounds has nothing to inspect.
- There is no published independent no-logs audit of this service comparable to the Deloitte, PwC and KPMG engagements the standalone VPN vendors commission, so the no-logging position rests on the privacy policies of two separate companies rather than on any external assurance.
- The free tier bundled with the antivirus suites is capped at a small daily allowance and selects the server for you, so it is a demonstration rather than a usable VPN, and customers who assumed their suite included a VPN find they need a further paid upgrade.
- Feature depth is well below the dedicated market: no port forwarding, no dedicated IP, no multi-hop, no city-level server selection and no Linux or router client, so routers, NAS devices, consoles and anything needing an inbound connection cannot be covered at all.
Pricing, plan by plan
Acunetix
On request- StandardFree
- Single user
- 5 targets
- Scheduled scans
- PremiumFree
- Multiple users
- Unlimited targets
- CI/CD integration
- Acunetix 360Free
- Enterprise features
- SDLC integration
- Custom workflows
Bitdefender VPN
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Bitdefender VPN review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Acunetix if
- You need dast scanning.
- You work on Desktop, Web, Api.
- You also want iast technology.
Choose Bitdefender VPN if
- You need suite integration.
- You also want catapult hydra transport.
Questions people ask
- Is Acunetix or Bitdefender VPN better?
- Neither clearly leads. Acunetix starts at On request and Bitdefender VPN at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Acunetix or Bitdefender VPN?
- Acunetix starts at On request and Bitdefender VPN at On request.
- Does Acunetix or Bitdefender VPN run on more platforms?
- Acunetix runs on Desktop, Web, Api. Bitdefender VPN runs on Web.
- What is Acunetix best used for?
- Acunetix is most often used for scanning web applications for security vulnerabilities, testing apis for exploitable weaknesses and threats, automating dynamic application security testing (dast), finding and validating security issues in production environments. Of those, scanning web applications for security vulnerabilities and testing apis for exploitable weaknesses and threats are not what Bitdefender VPN is typically brought in for.
- What can Acunetix do that Bitdefender VPN cannot?
- Acunetix covers DAST scanning, IAST technology, AcuSensor, JavaScript security. Bitdefender VPN covers Suite integration, Catapult Hydra transport, WireGuard support, Kill switch.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Acunetix: How much does Invicti (formerly Acunetix) cost?
Invicti pricing is available by quote based on your organization's needs, application count, and required features. The platform offers 8x faster scanning compared to competitors and detects 99.98% of exploitable vulnerabilities. Contact Invicti sales for a custom pricing proposal.
SourceBitdefender VPN: Who actually operates the servers?
The underlying VPN network and the Catapult Hydra protocol are licensed from Aura, previously known as Pango and AnchorFree, the operator of Hotspot Shield. Bitdefender identifies the arrangement in its VPN terms. Your traffic therefore passes through a United States based provider's infrastructure.
Bitdefender VPN: Is the free version enough?
Only as a taster. It is capped at a small daily traffic allowance and chooses the server itself, which rules out streaming and any sustained use. It exists to demonstrate the feature inside the antivirus suite.
Bitdefender VPN: Has the no-logs claim been independently audited?
There is no published independent no-logs audit of this service equivalent to those commissioned by the dedicated VPN providers. If an audited no-logging claim is what you are buying, this is not the product for it.
Bitdefender VPN: Does it work with streaming services?
Sometimes, but it is not built around that use case, there is no per-service server labelling, and there is no commitment to restoring access when a platform blocks a range. A streaming-focused provider is a better fit if that is the reason you want a VPN.
Bitdefender VPN: Can I run it on Linux or a router?
No. There is no Linux client and no router firmware or manual configuration option, so coverage is limited to the Windows, macOS, iOS and Android clients.
Related pages
More on Bitdefender VPN
Other head to heads
- Acunetix vs Norton 360
- Acunetix vs 1Password
- Acunetix vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Acunetix vs LastPass
- Acunetix vs Burp Suite
- Acunetix vs Veracode
- Acunetix vs Nessus
- Acunetix vs OWASP ZAP
- Acunetix vs Arnica
- Acunetix vs Doppler
- Acunetix vs Aikido
- Acunetix vs NordPass
- Acunetix vs One Identity
- Acunetix vs Ory Kratos
- Acunetix vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Acunetix vs Tenable Nessus
- Acunetix vs IBM QRadar
- Acunetix vs Quantexa
- Acunetix vs ExpressVPN
- Acunetix vs NordVPN
- Acunetix vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Acunetix vs Jamf Pro
- Acunetix vs Proofpoint
- Acunetix vs March Networks
- Acunetix vs Jumio
- Acunetix vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Acunetix vs LogicManager
- Acunetix vs Mullvad VPN
- Acunetix vs Private Internet Access
- Acunetix vs CyberGhost VPN
- Bitdefender VPN vs Norton 360
- Bitdefender VPN vs 1Password
- Bitdefender VPN vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Bitdefender VPN vs LastPass
- Bitdefender VPN vs Burp Suite
- Bitdefender VPN vs Veracode
- Bitdefender VPN vs Nessus
- Bitdefender VPN vs OWASP ZAP
- Bitdefender VPN vs Arnica
- Bitdefender VPN vs Doppler
- Bitdefender VPN vs Aikido
- Bitdefender VPN vs NordPass
- Bitdefender VPN vs One Identity
- Bitdefender VPN vs Ory Kratos
- Bitdefender VPN vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Bitdefender VPN vs Tenable Nessus
- Bitdefender VPN vs IBM QRadar
- Bitdefender VPN vs Quantexa
- Bitdefender VPN vs ExpressVPN
- Bitdefender VPN vs NordVPN
- Bitdefender VPN vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Bitdefender VPN vs Jamf Pro
- Bitdefender VPN vs Proofpoint
- Bitdefender VPN vs March Networks
- Bitdefender VPN vs Jumio
- Bitdefender VPN vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Bitdefender VPN vs LogicManager
- Bitdefender VPN vs Mullvad VPN
- Bitdefender VPN vs Private Internet Access
- Bitdefender VPN vs CyberGhost VPN
