Softwr

Automation Integration · head to head

Activiti vs Jitterbit

Activiti logo

Activiti

Automation Integration

Apache 2.0 BPMN engine under Hyland, from which Flowable and Camunda were forked

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Jitterbit logo

Jitterbit

Automation Integration

The API integration platform

From
$500/month
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only Activiti has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Activiti the last stable release was 8.2.0 in January 2024, and while release candidate builds continue, a two-year gap between stable versions is a real risk signal for a production dependency.; Jitterbit no public pricing amounts disclosed; all plans require annual contracts and custom quotes
  • They diverge on capability: Activiti covers BPMN 2.0 engine, Jitterbit covers Low-code integration.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Activiti and Jitterbit actually diverge.

Attributes where Activiti and Jitterbit differ
AttributeActivitiJitterbit
Starting priceFree$500/month
Pricing modelOpen source, no licence feesubscription
Free tierYesNo
PlatformsLinux, Windows, Docker, KubernetesWeb, On-premise
FoundedUnknown2003

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Activiti

  • BPMN 2.0 engine
  • Activiti Cloud
  • Modeler
  • Java and REST APIs
  • Pluggable persistence
  • Identity integration

Only in Jitterbit

  • Low-code integration
  • API connectors
  • Data transformation
  • Real-time sync
  • Error handling
  • Monitoring
  • Scheduling
  • 400+ connectors

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Activiti

  • An Alfresco or Hyland content services deployment where Activiti is already the embedded workflow enginenot Jitterbit
  • A Java application that needs to embed a BPMN engine as a library under a permissive licencenot Jitterbit
  • An organisation that has ruled out Camunda 8 on licence grounds and needs an Apache 2.0 alternativenot Jitterbit
  • Document-centric approval workflows where the process engine sits inside the content management stack rather than beside itnot Jitterbit

Jitterbit

  • Integrating SaaS applications through the Harmony iPaaSnot Activiti
  • EDI exchange with trading partners into an ERPnot Activiti
  • API creation and management with API Managernot Activiti
  • Low-code internal app building with App Buildernot Activiti
  • Automating order-to-cash and lead-to-order workflowsnot Activiti

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Activiti

  • The last stable release was 8.2.0 in January 2024, and while release candidate builds continue, a two-year gap between stable versions is a real risk signal for a production dependency.
  • Both Camunda and Flowable forked away and took large parts of the contributor base with them, so the community, tutorials and third-party tooling around Activiti are much thinner than around either fork.
  • Commercial support is only realistically available by buying Hyland Alfresco subscriptions, so there is no way to pay for Activiti support on its own.
  • Activiti Cloud imposes a distributed architecture of several Spring Boot services plus Keycloak, which is heavy for teams who simply wanted an embeddable engine.
  • Documentation is dated and partly split between old Alfresco sites and Hyland Connect, and the transition between Activiti 6, 7 and 8 architectures makes much of the older material actively misleading.

Jitterbit

  • No public pricing amounts disclosed; all plans require annual contracts and custom quotes
  • Pricing model complex with separate tiers for iPaaS and App Builder products
  • Connection limits, environment counts, and agent allocations vary by tier, making comparison difficult without public pricing

Pricing, plan by plan

Activiti

Free
  • ActivitiFree
    • Apache 2.0 licence
    • Embeddable Java library or Activiti Cloud services
    • No usage limits

Jitterbit

$500/month
  • Starter$500/month
    • Basic integration
  • Professional$1500/month
    • Advanced features
    • Priority support
  • Enterprise$5000/month
    • Custom solutions
    • Dedicated support

Which should you pick?

Choose Activiti if

  • You need bpmn 2.0 engine.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
  • You also want activiti cloud.
Activiti review

Choose Jitterbit if

  • You need low-code integration.
  • You work on Web, On-premise.
  • You also want api connectors.
Jitterbit review

Questions people ask

Is Activiti or Jitterbit better?
Neither clearly leads. Activiti starts at Free and Jitterbit at $500/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Activiti or Jitterbit?
Activiti has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Activiti and $500/month for Jitterbit.
Does Activiti or Jitterbit run on more platforms?
Activiti runs on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes. Jitterbit runs on Web, On-premise.
Can I use Activiti for free?
Yes. Activiti has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Jitterbit starts at $500/month.
What is Activiti best used for?
Activiti is most often used for an alfresco or hyland content services deployment where activiti is already the embedded workflow engine, a java application that needs to embed a bpmn engine as a library under a permissive licence, an organisation that has ruled out camunda 8 on licence grounds and needs an apache 2.0 alternative, document-centric approval workflows where the process engine sits inside the content management stack rather than beside it. Of those, an alfresco or hyland content services deployment where activiti is already the embedded workflow engine and a java application that needs to embed a bpmn engine as a library under a permissive licence are not what Jitterbit is typically brought in for.
What can Activiti do that Jitterbit cannot?
Activiti covers BPMN 2.0 engine, Activiti Cloud, Modeler, Java and REST APIs. Jitterbit covers Low-code integration, API connectors, Data transformation, Real-time sync.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Activiti: Is Activiti still maintained?

Yes, Hyland continues to publish builds, but the last stable release was 8.2.0 in January 2024.

Jitterbit: How much does Jitterbit cost?

Jitterbit does not publish standard pricing. The platform offers tiered plans (Standard, Professional, Enterprise) for both iPaaS and App Builder, all requiring annual contracts. Custom pricing is available based on specific requirements, with discounts offered for nonprofits and educational institutions.

Source
Activiti: What is its relationship to Camunda and Flowable?

Both are forks of Activiti: Camunda in 2013 and Flowable in 2016, when core developers left Alfresco.

Jitterbit: What's included in Jitterbit's plans?

Jitterbit iPaaS plans include 2-8+ connections, 2-4 private agents, and environments ranging from 2 to 99. App Builder plans include 4-20+ apps with 2-8 instances. Support response times range from 48-hour (Standard) to 6-hour (Enterprise). Specific pricing requires a custom quote.

Source
Activiti: What licence is it?

Apache 2.0, which distinguishes it from Camunda 8’s source-available licence.

Activiti: Should I choose Activiti for a new project?

Only if the Apache licence or an existing Alfresco deployment is decisive. Flowable and Camunda have far larger ecosystems.

Share

Related pages

More on Activiti

More on Jitterbit

Keep looking

Other head to heads