Automation Integration · head to head
Activiti vs Budibase

Activiti
Automation Integration
Apache 2.0 BPMN engine under Hyland, from which Flowable and Camunda were forked
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Activiti the last stable release was 8.2.0 in January 2024, and while release candidate builds continue, a two-year gap between stable versions is a real risk signal for a production dependency.; Budibase cloud plans are metered on automation actions, from 5,000 a month on Pro to 250,000 on Business
- They diverge on capability: Activiti covers BPMN 2.0 engine, Budibase covers Drag-and-drop builder.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Activiti and Budibase actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Activiti
- BPMN 2.0 engine
- Activiti Cloud
- Modeler
- Java and REST APIs
- Pluggable persistence
- Identity integration
Only in Budibase
- Drag-and-drop builder
- Database design
- REST API
- User management
- Custom code
- Workflows
- Responsive design
- 100+ integrations
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Activiti
- An Alfresco or Hyland content services deployment where Activiti is already the embedded workflow enginenot Budibase
- A Java application that needs to embed a BPMN engine as a library under a permissive licencenot Budibase
- An organisation that has ruled out Camunda 8 on licence grounds and needs an Apache 2.0 alternativenot Budibase
- Document-centric approval workflows where the process engine sits inside the content management stack rather than beside itnot Budibase
Budibase
- Building internal tools over existing databasesnot Activiti
- Self-hosting an open source low-code platformnot Activiti
- Admin panels and CRUD apps for operations teamsnot Activiti
- Automations triggered by data changesnot Activiti
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Activiti
- The last stable release was 8.2.0 in January 2024, and while release candidate builds continue, a two-year gap between stable versions is a real risk signal for a production dependency.
- Both Camunda and Flowable forked away and took large parts of the contributor base with them, so the community, tutorials and third-party tooling around Activiti are much thinner than around either fork.
- Commercial support is only realistically available by buying Hyland Alfresco subscriptions, so there is no way to pay for Activiti support on its own.
- Activiti Cloud imposes a distributed architecture of several Spring Boot services plus Keycloak, which is heavy for teams who simply wanted an embeddable engine.
- Documentation is dated and partly split between old Alfresco sites and Hyland Connect, and the transition between Activiti 6, 7 and 8 architectures makes much of the older material actively misleading.
Budibase
- Cloud plans are metered on automation actions, from 5,000 a month on Pro to 250,000 on Business
- Creator seats are limited and cost $50 each beyond the included count
- End users are $5 per user per month on top of the plan
- Custom branding needs Premium, SSO enforcement and environment variables need Business, and audit logs are Enterprise only
- Log retention is tiered from 1 day on Pro to 365 days on Enterprise
- Monthly billing costs 20 percent more than annual
Pricing, plan by plan
Activiti
Free- ActivitiFree
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Embeddable Java library or Activiti Cloud services
- No usage limits
Budibase
Free- Open SourceFree
- Self-hosted
- Community support
- FreeFree
- Cloud hosted
- Limited features
- Premium$50/month
- Advanced features
- Email support
Which should you pick?
Choose Activiti if
- You need bpmn 2.0 engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want activiti cloud.
Choose Budibase if
- You need drag-and-drop builder.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted.
- You also want database design.
Questions people ask
- Is Activiti or Budibase better?
- Neither clearly leads. Activiti starts at Free and Budibase at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Activiti or Budibase?
- Activiti starts at Free and Budibase at Free.
- Does Activiti or Budibase run on more platforms?
- Activiti runs on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes. Budibase runs on Web, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Activiti for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Activiti best used for?
- Activiti is most often used for an alfresco or hyland content services deployment where activiti is already the embedded workflow engine, a java application that needs to embed a bpmn engine as a library under a permissive licence, an organisation that has ruled out camunda 8 on licence grounds and needs an apache 2.0 alternative, document-centric approval workflows where the process engine sits inside the content management stack rather than beside it. Of those, an alfresco or hyland content services deployment where activiti is already the embedded workflow engine and a java application that needs to embed a bpmn engine as a library under a permissive licence are not what Budibase is typically brought in for.
- What can Activiti do that Budibase cannot?
- Activiti covers BPMN 2.0 engine, Activiti Cloud, Modeler, Java and REST APIs. Budibase covers Drag-and-drop builder, Database design, REST API, User management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Activiti: Is Activiti still maintained?
Yes, Hyland continues to publish builds, but the last stable release was 8.2.0 in January 2024.
Budibase: What happens if I exceed the monthly action limit on my plan?
Actions are hard monthly limits. Once you reach the limit on your plan (5K for Pro, 20K for Premium, 250K for Business), you must upgrade to a higher tier to continue using the service.
SourceActiviti: What is its relationship to Camunda and Flowable?
Both are forks of Activiti: Camunda in 2013 and Flowable in 2016, when core developers left Alfresco.
Budibase: Is there a charge for additional users beyond what is included in my plan?
Yes. Each plan includes a limited number of creators (1 for Pro, expandable for Premium, 3 for Business), but end users are charged at $5 per user per month as an add-on.
SourceActiviti: What licence is it?
Apache 2.0, which distinguishes it from Camunda 8’s source-available licence.
Budibase: How much extra do I pay if I choose monthly billing instead of yearly?
Monthly billing costs 20% more than the yearly equivalent. For example, paying monthly for Pro at $19/month equals $228 per year, versus $190 per year on a yearly subscription.
SourceActiviti: Should I choose Activiti for a new project?
Only if the Apache licence or an existing Alfresco deployment is decisive. Flowable and Camunda have far larger ecosystems.
Budibase: Can I try Budibase before committing to a paid plan?
Yes. All paid cloud plans include a 14-day free trial. The open source version is also available free with unlimited actions and unlimited users, though with community support only.
SourceBudibase: Does the free open source plan include the same features as paid plans?
The open source plan includes unlimited actions, unlimited apps, automations, agents, and users, but support is community-only rather than through Budibase directly. Paid plans add features like AI credits, custom branding, backups, and email or priority support.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Activiti vs n8n
- Activiti vs Temporal
- Activiti vs Flowable
- Activiti vs jBPM
- Activiti vs Camunda
- Activiti vs Nango
- Activiti vs Kogito
- Activiti vs Airbyte
- Activiti vs Windmill
- Activiti vs Meltano
- Activiti vs Zapier
- Activiti vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Activiti vs Census
- Activiti vs Decodable
- Activiti vs Dify
- Activiti vs Flowise
- Activiti vs Tableau
- Activiti vs Metabase
- Activiti vs Looker
- Activiti vs Redash
- Activiti vs Rowy
- Activiti vs Baserow
- Activiti vs NocoDB
- Activiti vs Cube Software
- Activiti vs Mathesar
- Activiti vs SeaTable
- Activiti vs Fibery
- Activiti vs Apache Superset
- Activiti vs Quadratic
- Activiti vs Sigma Computing
- Activiti vs Teable
- Budibase vs n8n
- Budibase vs Temporal
- Budibase vs Flowable
- Budibase vs jBPM
- Budibase vs Camunda
- Budibase vs Nango
- Budibase vs Kogito
- Budibase vs Airbyte
- Budibase vs Windmill
- Budibase vs Meltano
- Budibase vs Zapier
- Budibase vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Budibase vs Census
- Budibase vs Decodable
- Budibase vs Dify
- Budibase vs Flowise
- Budibase vs Tableau
- Budibase vs Metabase
- Budibase vs Looker
- Budibase vs Redash
- Budibase vs Rowy
- Budibase vs Baserow
- Budibase vs NocoDB
- Budibase vs Cube Software
- Budibase vs Mathesar
- Budibase vs SeaTable
- Budibase vs Fibery
- Budibase vs Apache Superset
- Budibase vs Quadratic
- Budibase vs Sigma Computing
- Budibase vs Teable

