Automation Integration · head to head
Activiti vs Baserow

Activiti
Automation Integration
Apache 2.0 BPMN engine under Hyland, from which Flowable and Camunda were forked
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Activiti the last stable release was 8.2.0 in January 2024, and while release candidate builds continue, a two-year gap between stable versions is a real risk signal for a production dependency.; Baserow the free tier is capped at 3,000 rows and 2GB of storage per workspace
- They diverge on capability: Activiti covers BPMN 2.0 engine, Baserow covers Database tables.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Activiti and Baserow actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Activiti
- BPMN 2.0 engine
- Activiti Cloud
- Modeler
- Java and REST APIs
- Pluggable persistence
- Identity integration
Only in Baserow
- Database tables
- Multiple views
- Forms
- API access
- Real-time collaboration
- Templates
- Plugins
- Self-hosting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Activiti
- An Alfresco or Hyland content services deployment where Activiti is already the embedded workflow enginenot Baserow
- A Java application that needs to embed a BPMN engine as a library under a permissive licencenot Baserow
- An organisation that has ruled out Camunda 8 on licence grounds and needs an Apache 2.0 alternativenot Baserow
- Document-centric approval workflows where the process engine sits inside the content management stack rather than beside itnot Baserow
Baserow
- Self-hosting an open source alternative to a spreadsheet databasenot Activiti
- Structured team data with Kanban, calendar and grid viewsnot Activiti
- Building internal tools on top of a database with an APInot Activiti
- Sharing data with external app users without giving them full seatsnot Activiti
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Activiti
- The last stable release was 8.2.0 in January 2024, and while release candidate builds continue, a two-year gap between stable versions is a real risk signal for a production dependency.
- Both Camunda and Flowable forked away and took large parts of the contributor base with them, so the community, tutorials and third-party tooling around Activiti are much thinner than around either fork.
- Commercial support is only realistically available by buying Hyland Alfresco subscriptions, so there is no way to pay for Activiti support on its own.
- Activiti Cloud imposes a distributed architecture of several Spring Boot services plus Keycloak, which is heavy for teams who simply wanted an embeddable engine.
- Documentation is dated and partly split between old Alfresco sites and Hyland Connect, and the transition between Activiti 6, 7 and 8 architectures makes much of the older material actively misleading.
Baserow
- The free tier is capped at 3,000 rows and 2GB of storage per workspace
- Kanban, calendar and survey views need Premium at $10 per user per month billed yearly
- Role-based permissions, audit logs and SSO require Premium or higher
- Row limits are per workspace rather than per table, so splitting data across bases does not raise the ceiling
- Automation runs are metered as credits, 2,000 a month on free
Pricing, plan by plan
Activiti
Free- ActivitiFree
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Embeddable Java library or Activiti Cloud services
- No usage limits
Baserow
Free- FreeFree
- 3000 rows per workspace
- 2 GB storage per workspace
- 2000 automation credits monthly
- Premium$10/month
- 50000 rows per workspace
- 20 GB storage per workspace
- 100000 automation credits monthly
- Advanced$18/month
- 250000 rows per workspace
- 100 GB storage per workspace
- 500000 automation credits monthly
- Enterprise$null/month
- 1000000 rows per workspace
- 1000 GB storage per workspace
- 2000000 automation credits monthly
Which should you pick?
Choose Activiti if
- You need bpmn 2.0 engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want activiti cloud.
Choose Baserow if
- You need database tables.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Self-hosted.
- You also want multiple views.
Questions people ask
- Is Activiti or Baserow better?
- Neither clearly leads. Activiti starts at Free and Baserow at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Activiti or Baserow?
- Activiti starts at Free and Baserow at Free.
- Does Activiti or Baserow run on more platforms?
- Activiti runs on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes. Baserow runs on Web, Api, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Activiti for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Activiti best used for?
- Activiti is most often used for an alfresco or hyland content services deployment where activiti is already the embedded workflow engine, a java application that needs to embed a bpmn engine as a library under a permissive licence, an organisation that has ruled out camunda 8 on licence grounds and needs an apache 2.0 alternative, document-centric approval workflows where the process engine sits inside the content management stack rather than beside it. Of those, an alfresco or hyland content services deployment where activiti is already the embedded workflow engine and a java application that needs to embed a bpmn engine as a library under a permissive licence are not what Baserow is typically brought in for.
- What can Activiti do that Baserow cannot?
- Activiti covers BPMN 2.0 engine, Activiti Cloud, Modeler, Java and REST APIs. Baserow covers Database tables, Multiple views, Forms, API access.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Activiti: Is Activiti still maintained?
Yes, Hyland continues to publish builds, but the last stable release was 8.2.0 in January 2024.
Baserow: Does Baserow have a free plan?
Baserow's Free plan includes 3000 rows per workspace, 2 GB storage, 2000 automation credits monthly, and access to Grid, Form, and Gallery views. It supports up to 500 external app users and includes 65+ templates with no credit card required.
SourceActiviti: What is its relationship to Camunda and Flowable?
Both are forks of Activiti: Camunda in 2013 and Flowable in 2016, when core developers left Alfresco.
Baserow: What row and storage limits does Baserow provide by plan?
Free plan: 3000 rows and 2 GB storage; Premium plan: 50000 rows and 20 GB; Advanced plan: 250000 rows and 100 GB; Enterprise plan: 1000000 rows and 1 TB. All limits are per workspace.
SourceActiviti: What licence is it?
Apache 2.0, which distinguishes it from Camunda 8’s source-available licence.
Baserow: How much does Baserow Premium cost?
Baserow Premium costs $10 per user per month when billed annually, or $12 per month when billing monthly. Yearly billing provides better rates than monthly. Advanced plan costs $18/user/month annually or $22/month monthly.
SourceActiviti: Should I choose Activiti for a new project?
Only if the Apache licence or an existing Alfresco deployment is decisive. Flowable and Camunda have far larger ecosystems.
Baserow: What are automation credit limits in Baserow?
Free plan provides 2000 monthly automation credits, Premium provides 100000 monthly credits, Advanced provides 500000 monthly credits, and Enterprise provides 2000000 monthly credits for workflow automation.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Activiti vs n8n
- Activiti vs Temporal
- Activiti vs Flowable
- Activiti vs jBPM
- Activiti vs Camunda
- Activiti vs Nango
- Activiti vs Kogito
- Activiti vs Airbyte
- Activiti vs Windmill
- Activiti vs Meltano
- Activiti vs Zapier
- Activiti vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Activiti vs Census
- Activiti vs Decodable
- Activiti vs Dify
- Activiti vs Flowise
- Activiti vs SeaTable
- Activiti vs APITable
- Activiti vs Mathesar
- Activiti vs Teable
- Activiti vs Tableau
- Activiti vs Metabase
- Activiti vs Looker
- Activiti vs Redash
- Activiti vs Rowy
- Activiti vs NocoDB
- Activiti vs Budibase
- Activiti vs Equals
- Activiti vs Quadratic
- Activiti vs Sigma Computing
- Baserow vs n8n
- Baserow vs Temporal
- Baserow vs Flowable
- Baserow vs jBPM
- Baserow vs Camunda
- Baserow vs Nango
- Baserow vs Kogito
- Baserow vs Airbyte
- Baserow vs Windmill
- Baserow vs Meltano
- Baserow vs Zapier
- Baserow vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Baserow vs Census
- Baserow vs Decodable
- Baserow vs Dify
- Baserow vs Flowise
- Baserow vs SeaTable
- Baserow vs APITable
- Baserow vs Mathesar
- Baserow vs Teable
- Baserow vs Tableau
- Baserow vs Metabase
- Baserow vs Looker
- Baserow vs Redash
- Baserow vs Rowy
- Baserow vs NocoDB
- Baserow vs Budibase
- Baserow vs Equals
- Baserow vs Quadratic
- Baserow vs Sigma Computing

