Softwr

Developer Tools · head to head

WarpBuild vs Wasabi

WarpBuild logo

WarpBuild

Developer Tools

2x faster, 50% cheaper GitHub Actions runners

From
On request
Free plan
No
Full reviewWebsite
Wasabi logo

Wasabi

Cloud

Hot cloud storage without egress fees

From
$7.99/month
Free plan
No
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: WarpBuild per-minute pricing requires tracking usage to estimate monthly costs; Wasabi 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
  • They diverge on capability: WarpBuild covers Optimized runner infrastructure, Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which WarpBuild and Wasabi actually diverge.

Attributes where WarpBuild and Wasabi differ
AttributeWarpBuildWasabi
Starting priceOn request$7.99/month
Pricing modelUsage-based per minute, varies by runner configurationUnknown
PlatformsGitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS, CloudWeb, API
CategoryDeveloper ToolsCloud
FoundedUnknown2015

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in WarpBuild

  • Optimized runner infrastructure
  • Intelligent caching
  • Incremental builds
  • Multi-architecture support
  • Unlimited concurrency
  • Autoscaling
  • BYOC support
  • Docker builders

Only in Wasabi

  • Hot Cloud Storage
  • S3 Compatible API
  • Object Lock
  • Versioning
  • Multi-region
  • Data Migration Tools
  • Immutability
  • Ransomware Protection

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

WarpBuild

  • Accelerating CI builds for teams with high test volumesnot Wasabi
  • Running tests generated by AI coding assistants efficientlynot Wasabi
  • Reducing GitHub Actions costs by 50% or morenot Wasabi
  • Supporting teams that need ARM64 architecture runnersnot Wasabi

Wasabi

  • Backup and recoverynot WarpBuild
  • Media storagenot WarpBuild
  • Archive replacementnot WarpBuild
  • Ransomware protectionnot WarpBuild

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

WarpBuild

  • Per-minute pricing requires tracking usage to estimate monthly costs
  • Large configuration runners (32 vCPU) expensive at $0.064/min
  • macOS M4 Pro 12-core at $0.16/min is highest-cost option
  • BYOC option requires cloud setup by customer

Wasabi

  • 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
  • Significantly smaller global footprint than AWS with only 16 regions, resulting in higher latency for users in underserved regions
  • Performance can degrade with high-volume transactions requiring throughput management strategies
  • Hot storage only, no cold/archival storage tier for long-term data at lower cost
  • Support responsiveness gaps with teams experiencing multi-day waits for critical issue resolution

Pricing, plan by plan

WarpBuild

On request
  • Linux x86-64 (2vCPU, 8GB)$0.004/minute
    • 2 vCPU
    • 8 GB RAM
    • Standard performance
  • Linux x86-64 (4vCPU, 16GB)$0.008/minute
    • 4 vCPU
    • 16 GB RAM
    • Increased performance
  • Linux x86-64 (8vCPU, 32GB)$0.016/minute
    • 8 vCPU
    • 32 GB RAM
    • High performance
  • Linux x86-64 (16vCPU, 64GB)$0.032/minute
    • 16 vCPU
    • 64 GB RAM
    • Enterprise performance

Wasabi

$7.99/month

No published plan breakdown. See the Wasabi review.

Which should you pick?

Choose WarpBuild if

  • You need optimized runner infrastructure.
  • You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS, Cloud.
  • You also want intelligent caching.
WarpBuild review

Choose Wasabi if

  • You need hot cloud storage.
  • You work on Web, API.
  • You also want s3 compatible api.
Wasabi review

Questions people ask

Is WarpBuild or Wasabi better?
Neither clearly leads. WarpBuild starts at On request and Wasabi at $7.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, WarpBuild or Wasabi?
WarpBuild starts at On request and Wasabi at $7.99/month.
Does WarpBuild or Wasabi run on more platforms?
WarpBuild runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS, Cloud. Wasabi runs on Web, API.
What is WarpBuild best used for?
WarpBuild is most often used for accelerating ci builds for teams with high test volumes, running tests generated by ai coding assistants efficiently, reducing github actions costs by 50% or more, supporting teams that need arm64 architecture runners. Of those, accelerating ci builds for teams with high test volumes and running tests generated by ai coding assistants efficiently are not what Wasabi is typically brought in for.
What can WarpBuild do that Wasabi cannot?
WarpBuild covers Optimized runner infrastructure, Intelligent caching, Incremental builds, Multi-architecture support. Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage, S3 Compatible API, Object Lock, Versioning.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

WarpBuild: How much cheaper is WarpBuild compared to GitHub Actions?

WarpBuild offers approximately 50% cost savings compared to GitHub-hosted runners. For example, Linux x86-64 2vCPU/8GB costs $0.004/min with WarpBuild vs $0.008/min with GitHub Actions.

Source
Wasabi: What is Wasabi's pricing structure?

Wasabi offers pay-as-you-go pricing at $7.99 per TB per month as of July 2026, with no egress or API request fees. Reserved capacity plans are available for multi-year terms with volume discounts.

Source
WarpBuild: What is BYOC and how does it differ from managed runners?

BYOC (Bring Your Own Cloud) allows customers to run WarpBuild on their own cloud infrastructure at $0.002/min. Managed runners use WarpBuild's cloud infrastructure. BYOC provides lower costs but requires customer setup.

Source
Wasabi: Does Wasabi charge for data downloads or API calls?

No. Wasabi includes zero egress fees and zero API request fees, which is a major cost advantage over AWS S3. Customers can plan their budget to the penny without worrying about surprise data transfer charges.

Source
WarpBuild: Does WarpBuild support ARM64 runners?

Yes, WarpBuild offers ARM64 runners at lower costs than x86-64. Linux ARM64 starts at $0.003/min for 2vCPU/8GB configuration.

Source
Wasabi: Is there a minimum storage duration requirement?

Yes. Wasabi enforces a 90-day minimum storage term. Users who delete data before 90 days are still charged for the full 90-day period.

Source
Wasabi: Is Wasabi S3-compatible?

Yes. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is fully S3-compatible, meaning organizations can integrate it into existing workflows without rewriting application code used with AWS S3.

Share

Related pages

More on WarpBuild

More on Wasabi

Keep looking

Other head to heads