Developer Tools · head to head
Restate vs Wasabi

Restate
Developer Tools
Durable execution engine in Rust with a free tier and low-latency workflows
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Restate has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Restate the runtime is under a Business Source Licence rather than an open source licence, so building a competing managed offering on it is prohibited and some procurement functions will reject it on licence grounds alone.; Wasabi 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- They diverge on capability: Restate covers Durable execution, Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Restate and Wasabi actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Restate
- Durable execution
- Virtual objects
- Single binary runtime
- Multi-language SDKs
- Workflows and sagas
- Restate Cloud
Only in Wasabi
- Hot Cloud Storage
- S3 Compatible API
- Object Lock
- Versioning
- Multi-region
- Data Migration Tools
- Immutability
- Ransomware Protection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Restate
- Payment or order flows where a crash between two external API calls must not double-charge or lose the ordernot Wasabi
- AI agent loops that call tools over minutes or hours and must survive a deployment mid-runnot Wasabi
- Replacing hand-rolled retry, idempotency key and outbox code across a set of microservicesnot Wasabi
- A small team that wants durable workflows without operating a Temporal cluster and its databasenot Wasabi
Wasabi
- Backup and recoverynot Restate
- Media storagenot Restate
- Archive replacementnot Restate
- Ransomware protectionnot Restate
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Restate
- The runtime is under a Business Source Licence rather than an open source licence, so building a competing managed offering on it is prohibited and some procurement functions will reject it on licence grounds alone.
- Restate Cloud jumps from a free fifty thousand actions straight to 300 US dollars a month for twenty million, so a workload sitting at a few hundred thousand actions pays enterprise-shaped money for hobby-shaped volume.
- It is a young project against Temporal’s established base, so hiring engineers who already know it is unrealistic and the answer to most questions is in the docs rather than on Stack Overflow.
- The programming model requires structuring code around durable handlers and virtual objects, which is a genuine rewrite for existing services rather than a library you add.
- The single-binary simplicity that makes small deployments cheap also means fewer operational knobs at very large scale than a system designed as separable components.
Wasabi
- 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- Significantly smaller global footprint than AWS with only 16 regions, resulting in higher latency for users in underserved regions
- Performance can degrade with high-volume transactions requiring throughput management strategies
- Hot storage only, no cold/archival storage tier for long-term data at lower cost
- Support responsiveness gaps with teams experiencing multi-day waits for critical issue resolution
Pricing, plan by plan
Restate
Free- FreeFree
- Fifty thousand durable actions per month
- No credit card required
- Community support
- Starter$300/month
- Twenty million actions per month
- Two hundred actions per second, bursting to one thousand
- Twenty GB storage
- Pro$1000/month
- Fifty million actions per month
- Five hundred actions per second, bursting to two thousand
- Fifty GB storage
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Negotiated volume
- Twenty-four seven P0 support
- 99.99 per cent SLA
Wasabi
$7.99/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Wasabi review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Restate if
- You need durable execution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Web.
- You also want virtual objects.
Choose Wasabi if
- You need hot cloud storage.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want s3 compatible api.
Questions people ask
- Is Restate or Wasabi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Restate starts at Free and Wasabi at $7.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Restate or Wasabi?
- Restate has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Restate and $7.99/month for Wasabi.
- Does Restate or Wasabi run on more platforms?
- Restate runs on Linux, macOS, Web. Wasabi runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Restate for free?
- Yes. Restate has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Wasabi starts at $7.99/month.
- What is Restate best used for?
- Restate is most often used for payment or order flows where a crash between two external api calls must not double-charge or lose the order, ai agent loops that call tools over minutes or hours and must survive a deployment mid-run, replacing hand-rolled retry, idempotency key and outbox code across a set of microservices, a small team that wants durable workflows without operating a temporal cluster and its database. Of those, payment or order flows where a crash between two external api calls must not double-charge or lose the order and ai agent loops that call tools over minutes or hours and must survive a deployment mid-run are not what Wasabi is typically brought in for.
- What can Restate do that Wasabi cannot?
- Restate covers Durable execution, Virtual objects, Single binary runtime, Multi-language SDKs. Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage, S3 Compatible API, Object Lock, Versioning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Restate: Is Restate open source?
The SDKs are MIT. The runtime is under a Business Source Licence, which permits self-hosting but not offering it as a competing service.
Wasabi: What is Wasabi's pricing structure?
Wasabi offers pay-as-you-go pricing at $7.99 per TB per month as of July 2026, with no egress or API request fees. Reserved capacity plans are available for multi-year terms with volume discounts.
SourceRestate: How does it compare with Temporal?
Same problem, different shape: one Rust binary with embedded storage instead of a server plus database plus workers, and lower per-step latency.
Wasabi: Does Wasabi charge for data downloads or API calls?
No. Wasabi includes zero egress fees and zero API request fees, which is a major cost advantage over AWS S3. Customers can plan their budget to the penny without worrying about surprise data transfer charges.
SourceRestate: Is there a free tier?
Yes, fifty thousand durable actions a month on Restate Cloud with no card required.
Wasabi: Is there a minimum storage duration requirement?
Yes. Wasabi enforces a 90-day minimum storage term. Users who delete data before 90 days are still charged for the full 90-day period.
SourceRestate: Which languages are supported?
TypeScript, Java, Kotlin, Go, Python and Rust.
Wasabi: Is Wasabi S3-compatible?
Yes. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is fully S3-compatible, meaning organizations can integrate it into existing workflows without rewriting application code used with AWS S3.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Restate vs Helix
- Restate vs Rust
- Restate vs Atlantis
- Restate vs Jitsu
- Restate vs Okteto
- Restate vs Argo CD
- Restate vs Steampipe
- Restate vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Restate vs Deno
- Restate vs Visual Studio Code
- Restate vs Turborepo
- Restate vs Keycloak
- Restate vs Garden
- Restate vs GitLab CI/CD
- Restate vs HCP Terraform
- Restate vs Helm
- Restate vs Notepad++
- Restate vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Restate vs DigitalOcean
- Restate vs Hetzner Cloud
- Restate vs Scaleway
- Restate vs Linode
- Restate vs Vultr
- Restate vs Zeabur
- Restate vs Porter
- Restate vs Contabo
- Restate vs Encore
- Restate vs Google Cloud Platform
- Restate vs Microsoft Azure
- Restate vs HAProxy
- Restate vs IBM Cloud
- Restate vs kind
- Restate vs Koyeb
- Restate vs Kustomize
- Restate vs Linkerd
- Wasabi vs Helix
- Wasabi vs Rust
- Wasabi vs Atlantis
- Wasabi vs Jitsu
- Wasabi vs Okteto
- Wasabi vs Argo CD
- Wasabi vs Steampipe
- Wasabi vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Wasabi vs Deno
- Wasabi vs Visual Studio Code
- Wasabi vs Turborepo
- Wasabi vs Keycloak
- Wasabi vs Garden
- Wasabi vs GitLab CI/CD
- Wasabi vs HCP Terraform
- Wasabi vs Helm
- Wasabi vs Notepad++
- Wasabi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Wasabi vs DigitalOcean
- Wasabi vs Hetzner Cloud
- Wasabi vs Scaleway
- Wasabi vs Linode
- Wasabi vs Vultr
- Wasabi vs Zeabur
- Wasabi vs Porter
- Wasabi vs Contabo
- Wasabi vs Encore
- Wasabi vs Google Cloud Platform
- Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure
- Wasabi vs HAProxy
- Wasabi vs IBM Cloud
- Wasabi vs kind
- Wasabi vs Koyeb
- Wasabi vs Kustomize
- Wasabi vs Linkerd

