File Storage · head to head
Duplicati vs UrBackup

UrBackup
Backup
Open source client server backup doing both file and whole disk image backups of Windows machines
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Duplicati no managed service or commercial support; UrBackup backups are stored on the server without encryption at rest by default, so the backup server holds a readable copy of every machine it protects and becomes the highest value target on the network.
- They diverge on capability: Duplicati covers AES-256 encryption, UrBackup covers Windows image backups.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Duplicati and UrBackup actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Duplicati
- AES-256 encryption
- Incremental backup
- Deduplication
- Multiple cloud backends
- Compression
- AWS S3
- Azure
- Google Drive
Only in UrBackup
- Windows image backups
- File backups
- Client discovery
- Internet mode
- Filesystem deduplication
Both cover
- Web interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Duplicati
- Data protectionnot UrBackup
- Disaster recoverynot UrBackup
- Business continuitynot UrBackup
- Ransomware protectionnot UrBackup
- Compliancenot UrBackup
UrBackup
- A small office with Windows workstations that needs bare metal restore without per seat licensingnot Duplicati
- Schools and labs where machines are re-imaged often and a known good image must be recoverablenot Duplicati
- Backing up a mixed fleet to one server on premises with a web interface non specialists can usenot Duplicati
- Replacing an expiring commercial endpoint backup licence where the budget is the constraintnot Duplicati
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Duplicati
- No managed service or commercial support
- Relies on community support
- No enterprise features
UrBackup
- Backups are stored on the server without encryption at rest by default, so the backup server holds a readable copy of every machine it protects and becomes the highest value target on the network.
- Deduplication relies on filesystem features such as hard links, btrfs or ZFS, so a server built on the wrong filesystem silently consumes far more space and the fix is a rebuild rather than a setting.
- There is no native object storage target, so offsite copies mean replicating the server storage with another tool rather than backing up to a bucket directly.
- Restoring a full Windows image requires booting a restore environment, which is a manual, on site procedure that needs to be rehearsed before the day it is needed.
- A single server holds everything and there is no built in clustering, so its own failure removes every recovery point at once unless you have separately solved replication.
Pricing, plan by plan
Duplicati
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Duplicati review.
UrBackup
Free- UrBackupFree
- Full functionality, unlimited clients
- File and image backups
- Web administration interface
Which should you pick?
Choose Duplicati if
- You need aes-256 encryption.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want incremental backup.
Choose UrBackup if
- You need windows image backups.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD.
- You also want file backups.
Questions people ask
- Is Duplicati or UrBackup better?
- Neither clearly leads. Duplicati starts at Free and UrBackup at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Duplicati or UrBackup?
- Duplicati starts at Free and UrBackup at Free.
- Does Duplicati or UrBackup run on more platforms?
- Duplicati runs on Windows, macOS, Linux. UrBackup runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD.
- Can I use Duplicati for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Duplicati best used for?
- Duplicati is most often used for data protection, disaster recovery, business continuity, ransomware protection. Of those, data protection and disaster recovery are not what UrBackup is typically brought in for.
- What can Duplicati do that UrBackup cannot?
- Duplicati covers AES-256 encryption, Incremental backup, Deduplication, Multiple cloud backends. UrBackup covers Windows image backups, File backups, Client discovery, Internet mode. Both handle Web interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Duplicati: Is Duplicati free?
Yes. Duplicati is completely free and open-source under the LGPL license. There are no premium tiers, trials, or limitations.
SourceUrBackup: Does it back up Linux servers as well?
File backups yes, image backups no. The image path is Windows only through volume shadow copy.
Duplicati: What does Duplicati support?
Duplicati supports zero-trust, fully encrypted backups to local storage, network drives, and cloud services. It includes deduplication and incremental backups.
SourceUrBackup: Is the data encrypted?
Transport can be encrypted, and there is optional client side file encryption, but the default server storage is not encrypted at rest. Use full disk encryption on the server.
Duplicati: What are the platforms?
Duplicati runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux. It can back up data to local storage, network drives, or cloud providers.
SourceUrBackup: Can I back up to Amazon S3?
Not directly. The server writes to local or mounted storage, so cloud copies are made by replicating that storage separately.
UrBackup: How many clients can one server handle?
Dozens is routine on decent hardware. The limit is usually storage input and output during overlapping backup windows rather than client count.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Duplicati vs Arq Backup
- Duplicati vs Carbonite
- Duplicati vs Ceph
- Duplicati vs TrueNAS
- Duplicati vs Nextcloud
- Duplicati vs pCloud
- Duplicati vs Sync.com
- Duplicati vs Tresorit
- Duplicati vs Backblaze
- Duplicati vs Cloudian
- Duplicati vs LucidLink
- Duplicati vs Storj
- Duplicati vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Duplicati vs Zerto
- Duplicati vs IDrive e2
- Duplicati vs Panzura
- Duplicati vs Bacula
- Duplicati vs Velero
- Duplicati vs Kopia
- Duplicati vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Duplicati vs Clonezilla
- Duplicati vs Amanda Enterprise
- Duplicati vs rustic
- Duplicati vs BDRShield
- Duplicati vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Duplicati vs Borg Backup
- Duplicati vs Restic
- Duplicati vs Clumio
- Duplicati vs Cohesity
- Duplicati vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- Duplicati vs Bacula Enterprise
- UrBackup vs Arq Backup
- UrBackup vs Carbonite
- UrBackup vs Ceph
- UrBackup vs TrueNAS
- UrBackup vs Nextcloud
- UrBackup vs pCloud
- UrBackup vs Sync.com
- UrBackup vs Tresorit
- UrBackup vs Backblaze
- UrBackup vs Cloudian
- UrBackup vs LucidLink
- UrBackup vs Storj
- UrBackup vs Microsoft OneDrive
- UrBackup vs Zerto
- UrBackup vs IDrive e2
- UrBackup vs Panzura
- UrBackup vs Bacula
- UrBackup vs Velero
- UrBackup vs Kopia
- UrBackup vs Proxmox Backup Server
- UrBackup vs Clonezilla
- UrBackup vs Amanda Enterprise
- UrBackup vs rustic
- UrBackup vs BDRShield
- UrBackup vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- UrBackup vs Borg Backup
- UrBackup vs Restic
- UrBackup vs Clumio
- UrBackup vs Cohesity
- UrBackup vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- UrBackup vs Bacula Enterprise

