Agriculture · head to head
fieldmargin vs Tucor

fieldmargin
Agriculture
Per-farm field mapping, records and team messaging for livestock and arable farms
- From
- £3.75/month
- Rated
- -

Tucor
Agriculture
Decoder irrigation controllers with a yearly remote-access subscription priced separately for cellular and Ethernet
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: fieldmargin per-farm pricing inverts badly at the small end: a 30 hectare holding pays the same as a 3,000 hectare estate, so the effective cost per hectare on a smallholding is many times what a large farm pays.; Tucor nLPNet is a yearly subscription priced differently for cellular and Ethernet, so a site with no cabled network path is committed to the higher recurring rate for the life of the controller with no way to change it later without running fibre.
- They diverge on capability: fieldmargin covers Field mapping, Tucor covers NLP-C controller.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which fieldmargin and Tucor actually diverge.
| Attribute | fieldmargin | Tucor |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | £3.75/month | On request |
| Pricing model | Per farm per month, unlimited hectares | quote |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Windows, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Agriculture).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in fieldmargin
- Field mapping
- Offline mobile
- Team activity feed
- Job assignment
- Livestock groups
- Input and application records
- NDVI satellite imagery
- Cost per field
Only in Tucor
- NLP-C controller
- Decoder diagnostics
- Flow monitoring
- MAD-based programming
- Station prioritisation
- Weather correction and water budget
- NLPNet remote access
- Cycle Manager
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
fieldmargin
- A 900 hectare arable estate that wants field records without paying a per-hectare licence feenot Tucor
- A livestock farm tracking mob movements and grazing rotation across fields on a phone with no signalnot Tucor
- A farm manager assigning and checking off daily jobs for seasonal staff without phone callsnot Tucor
- A mixed farm that wants photos and notes attached to specific field locations for later referencenot Tucor
Tucor
- A university retrofitting a conventional multi-wire system to two-wire without trenching a new cable to every valvenot fieldmargin
- A nursery or greenhouse needing 50 independent programmes on one controllernot fieldmargin
- A grounds team chasing a decoder fault on a mile-long loop who need it located rather than dug fornot fieldmargin
- An HOA that wants unscheduled-flow alarms after a contractor cut a lateralnot fieldmargin
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
fieldmargin
- Per-farm pricing inverts badly at the small end: a 30 hectare holding pays the same as a 3,000 hectare estate, so the effective cost per hectare on a smallholding is many times what a large farm pays.
- It is not an agronomy platform, so there is no variable rate prescription engine and no nutrient planning to a standard a UK agronomist will certify, meaning most arable users still pay for Gatekeeper or an agronomist's own system alongside it.
- There is no direct submission route into Basic Payment Scheme, Sustainable Farming Incentive or equivalent schemes, so the compliance paperwork that costs farms real money still has to be assembled elsewhere.
- Machine integration is limited compared with Climate FieldView or Operations Center; as-applied data from the sprayer or drill generally is not flowing in automatically, so application records depend on someone typing them.
- Satellite NDVI is confined to the top tier and is standard public imagery, so cloud cover in a British winter means long gaps and the imagery is not a substitute for the aircraft or drone capture that specialist providers sell.
Tucor
- NLPNet is a yearly subscription priced differently for cellular and Ethernet, so a site with no cabled network path is committed to the higher recurring rate for the life of the controller with no way to change it later without running fibre.
- Neither the controllers nor the subscriptions have published prices, so a multi-controller estate cannot budget a rollout without distributor quotes for each site.
- Tucor runs two separate cloud portals, NLPNet and Cycle Manager, which is a confusing surface for a small vendor and means the answer to where a function lives depends on which product line you bought.
- It is a small independent competing with Rain Bird, Hunter and Toro, so the installer and spares network is thinner and a site is more exposed if a distributor relationship in its region ends.
- The product documentation is sparse compared with the major manufacturers, so specifying and commissioning depends heavily on the local distributor knowing the platform rather than on published material a consulting engineer can read.
Pricing, plan by plan
fieldmargin
£3.75/month- Essentials$3.75/month
- Field mapping and boundaries
- Field notes and photos
- Unlimited team members
- Plus$20/month
- Everything in Essentials
- Job assignment and tracking
- Input and application records
- Pro$30/month
- Everything in Plus
- NDVI satellite imagery
- Cost per field and crop analysis
Tucor
On request- NLPNet remote access$undefined/year
- Yearly subscription required for remote access
- Separate pricing for cellular and Ethernet connections
- Priced per controller
Which should you pick?
Choose fieldmargin if
- You need field mapping.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want offline mobile.
Choose Tucor if
- You need nlp-c controller.
- You work on Web, Windows, iOS, Android.
- You also want decoder diagnostics.
Questions people ask
- Is fieldmargin or Tucor better?
- Neither clearly leads. fieldmargin starts at £3.75/month and Tucor at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, fieldmargin or Tucor?
- fieldmargin starts at £3.75/month and Tucor at On request.
- Does fieldmargin or Tucor run on more platforms?
- fieldmargin runs on Web, iOS, Android. Tucor runs on Web, Windows, iOS, Android.
- What is fieldmargin best used for?
- fieldmargin is most often used for a 900 hectare arable estate that wants field records without paying a per-hectare licence fee, a livestock farm tracking mob movements and grazing rotation across fields on a phone with no signal, a farm manager assigning and checking off daily jobs for seasonal staff without phone calls, a mixed farm that wants photos and notes attached to specific field locations for later reference. Of those, a 900 hectare arable estate that wants field records without paying a per-hectare licence fee and a livestock farm tracking mob movements and grazing rotation across fields on a phone with no signal are not what Tucor is typically brought in for.
- What can fieldmargin do that Tucor cannot?
- fieldmargin covers Field mapping, Offline mobile, Team activity feed, Job assignment. Tucor covers NLP-C controller, Decoder diagnostics, Flow monitoring, MAD-based programming.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
fieldmargin: Does it charge per hectare?
No. Subscriptions are per farm with unlimited hectares and unlimited team members, which is why it is cheap on large acreages and proportionally expensive on small ones.
Tucor: Is remote access included with the controller?
No. NLPNet is a separate yearly subscription, and it is priced differently depending on whether the controller connects over cellular or Ethernet.
fieldmargin: Can I submit my BPS or SFI claim from it?
No. It holds the records that support a claim but there is no direct submission integration, so the claim itself is prepared elsewhere.
Tucor: How many valves can one controller run?
The NLP-C addresses up to 500 decoders and 125 sensors across 20 points of connection, with up to 50 programmes.
fieldmargin: Does it work without mobile signal?
Yes. The mobile apps capture records offline and sync when the phone regains a connection, which is the main reason it gets used in the far corners of a farm.
Tucor: Can Tucor retrofit a conventional system?
Yes, converting a conventional multi-wire installation to two-wire decoder control is the main reason sites choose it.
fieldmargin: Is there a free plan?
There is a 14 day trial rather than a permanently free tier. After that every farm is on a paid plan.
Tucor: Who owns Tucor?
It is a privately held company founded in 1995, based in Harmony, Pennsylvania, and independent of the major irrigation manufacturers.
Related pages
More on fieldmargin
Other head to heads
- fieldmargin vs Conservis
- fieldmargin vs Herdwatch
- fieldmargin vs Agworld
- fieldmargin vs Farmbrite
- fieldmargin vs AgriWebb
- fieldmargin vs DairyComp
- fieldmargin vs FarmLogs
- fieldmargin vs Tend
- fieldmargin vs FarmWorks
- fieldmargin vs Nedap Livestock Management
- fieldmargin vs Gallagher eShepherd
- fieldmargin vs John Deere Operations Center
- fieldmargin vs METER Group ZENTRA
- fieldmargin vs MyJohnDeere
- fieldmargin vs Netafim NetBeat
- fieldmargin vs Nofence
- fieldmargin vs Sentera
- fieldmargin vs Baseline Irrigation
- fieldmargin vs Toro Lynx Central Control
- fieldmargin vs WiseConn DropControl
- fieldmargin vs Galcon
- fieldmargin vs Soil Scout
- fieldmargin vs Lindsay FieldNET
- fieldmargin vs Reinke ReinCloud
- fieldmargin vs Valley Irrigation
- fieldmargin vs CeresAI
- fieldmargin vs CropX
- fieldmargin vs Davis Instruments WeatherLink
- fieldmargin vs DTN Agriculture
- fieldmargin vs FarmERP
- fieldmargin vs Lely Horizon
- Tucor vs Conservis
- Tucor vs Herdwatch
- Tucor vs Agworld
- Tucor vs Farmbrite
- Tucor vs AgriWebb
- Tucor vs DairyComp
- Tucor vs FarmLogs
- Tucor vs Tend
- Tucor vs FarmWorks
- Tucor vs Nedap Livestock Management
- Tucor vs Gallagher eShepherd
- Tucor vs John Deere Operations Center
- Tucor vs METER Group ZENTRA
- Tucor vs MyJohnDeere
- Tucor vs Netafim NetBeat
- Tucor vs Nofence
- Tucor vs Sentera
- Tucor vs Baseline Irrigation
- Tucor vs Toro Lynx Central Control
- Tucor vs WiseConn DropControl
- Tucor vs Galcon
- Tucor vs Soil Scout
- Tucor vs Lindsay FieldNET
- Tucor vs Reinke ReinCloud
- Tucor vs Valley Irrigation
- Tucor vs CeresAI
- Tucor vs CropX
- Tucor vs Davis Instruments WeatherLink
- Tucor vs DTN Agriculture
- Tucor vs FarmERP
- Tucor vs Lely Horizon
