Backup · head to head
Trilio vs Zerto

Trilio
Backup
Backup and recovery for OpenStack, Kubernetes and Red Hat Virtualization
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Trilio has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Trilio coverage is deliberately narrow, so a mixed estate with VMware and physical servers needs a second backup product and two sets of restore procedures.; Zerto zerto with Azure is listed on UK G-Cloud as a reseller-managed disaster recovery service, not Zerto's own licence pricing, with OS management from £75 per host per month for the public sector
- They diverge on capability: Trilio covers OpenStack backup, Zerto covers Continuous data protection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Trilio and Zerto actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Trilio
- OpenStack backup
- Kubernetes backup
- OpenShift Virtualization
- Open format backups
- Incremental forever
- Self-service restore
- Free basic edition
Only in Zerto
- Continuous data protection
- Journal-based recovery
- Automated failover
- Non-disruptive testing
- Multi-cloud mobility
- Long-term retention
- VMware
- Hyper-V
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Trilio
- A telco running an OpenStack cloud whose incumbent backup vendor supports it only through generic agentsnot Zerto
- An organisation migrating virtual machines from VMware to OpenShift Virtualization and needing protection on the new platform from day onenot Zerto
- A research institution protecting tenant workloads where each tenant should restore its own data without a ticketnot Zerto
- A platform team wanting to evaluate Kubernetes backup properly on ten nodes before committing budgetnot Zerto
Zerto
- Data protectionnot Trilio
- Disaster recoverynot Trilio
- Business continuitynot Trilio
- Ransomware protectionnot Trilio
- Compliancenot Trilio
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Trilio
- Coverage is deliberately narrow, so a mixed estate with VMware and physical servers needs a second backup product and two sets of restore procedures.
- Trilio is a small vendor next to the backup incumbents, and buyers with ten year retention obligations should assess the risk of the company being acquired or wound down.
- Enterprise pricing is per node or per virtual machine and is not published, which makes it hard to compare against per-terabyte competitors without going through sales.
- The free basic edition stops at ten nodes with community support only, so the step from evaluation to production is a full commercial negotiation rather than a tier upgrade.
- Restore performance depends on the object storage or NFS target you supply, and egress charges from a cloud object store during a large recovery sit outside the vendor quote entirely.
Zerto
- Zerto with Azure is listed on UK G-Cloud as a reseller-managed disaster recovery service, not Zerto's own licence pricing, with OS management from £75 per host per month for the public sector
Pricing, plan by plan
Trilio
Free- Basic EditionFree
- Up to ten nodes
- No time limit
- Community support only
- Enterprise Edition$undefined/year
- Priced per node or per virtual machine annually
- No scale limits
- OpenStack, Kubernetes, OpenShift and Red Hat Virtualization
Zerto
$5/month- Zerto Enterprise Cloud$5/month
- Continuous protection
- Journal-based recovery
- Multi-cloud mobility
Which should you pick?
Choose Trilio if
- You need openstack backup.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Web.
- You also want kubernetes backup.
Choose Zerto if
- You need continuous data protection.
- You work on Windows, Linux, Web.
- You also want journal-based recovery.
Questions people ask
- Is Trilio or Zerto better?
- Neither clearly leads. Trilio starts at Free and Zerto at $5/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Trilio or Zerto?
- Trilio has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Trilio and $5/month for Zerto.
- Does Trilio or Zerto run on more platforms?
- Trilio runs on Linux, Web. Zerto runs on Windows, Linux, Web.
- Can I use Trilio for free?
- Yes. Trilio has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Zerto starts at $5/month.
- What is Trilio best used for?
- Trilio is most often used for a telco running an openstack cloud whose incumbent backup vendor supports it only through generic agents, an organisation migrating virtual machines from vmware to openshift virtualization and needing protection on the new platform from day one, a research institution protecting tenant workloads where each tenant should restore its own data without a ticket, a platform team wanting to evaluate kubernetes backup properly on ten nodes before committing budget. Of those, a telco running an openstack cloud whose incumbent backup vendor supports it only through generic agents and an organisation migrating virtual machines from vmware to openshift virtualization and needing protection on the new platform from day one are not what Zerto is typically brought in for.
- What can Trilio do that Zerto cannot?
- Trilio covers OpenStack backup, Kubernetes backup, OpenShift Virtualization, Open format backups. Zerto covers Continuous data protection, Journal-based recovery, Automated failover, Non-disruptive testing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Trilio: Is the free edition production usable?
It is functionally complete up to ten nodes with community support only. Use it to evaluate, but understand that production incidents have no vendor behind them at that tier.
Zerto: Can I try Zerto before buying?
Yes, Zerto offers a 14-day free trial or on-demand lab access to test the platform.
SourceTrilio: Does it support OpenShift Virtualization?
Yes, which is the main reason it appears on shortlists for organisations moving virtual machines off VMware.
Trilio: Where are backups stored?
On NFS or S3-compatible object storage you provide, in an open format rather than a proprietary vendor container.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Trilio vs Velero
- Trilio vs Commvault Complete Data Protection
- Trilio vs Portworx Backup
- Trilio vs HYCU
- Trilio vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Trilio vs BDRShield
- Trilio vs CloudCasa
- Trilio vs Kopia
- Trilio vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Trilio vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Trilio vs Redstor
- Trilio vs rustic
- Trilio vs HPE StoreOnce
- Trilio vs MSP360 Backup
- Trilio vs N-able Backup
- Trilio vs OwnBackup
- Trilio vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Trilio vs Carbonite
- Trilio vs Barracuda Backup
- Trilio vs Backblaze
- Trilio vs Veritas NetBackup
- Trilio vs Nasuni
- Trilio vs Cloudflare R2
- Trilio vs CrashPlan
- Trilio vs TrueNAS
- Trilio vs IDrive
- Trilio vs Tigris
- Trilio vs Tresorit
- Trilio vs LucidLink
- Trilio vs Panzura
- Trilio vs pCloud
- Trilio vs Scality RING
- Trilio vs Storj
- Trilio vs IDrive e2
- Zerto vs Velero
- Zerto vs Commvault Complete Data Protection
- Zerto vs Portworx Backup
- Zerto vs HYCU
- Zerto vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Zerto vs BDRShield
- Zerto vs CloudCasa
- Zerto vs Kopia
- Zerto vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Zerto vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Zerto vs Redstor
- Zerto vs rustic
- Zerto vs HPE StoreOnce
- Zerto vs MSP360 Backup
- Zerto vs N-able Backup
- Zerto vs OwnBackup
- Zerto vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Zerto vs Carbonite
- Zerto vs Barracuda Backup
- Zerto vs Backblaze
- Zerto vs Veritas NetBackup
- Zerto vs Nasuni
- Zerto vs Cloudflare R2
- Zerto vs CrashPlan
- Zerto vs TrueNAS
- Zerto vs IDrive
- Zerto vs Tigris
- Zerto vs Tresorit
- Zerto vs LucidLink
- Zerto vs Panzura
- Zerto vs pCloud
- Zerto vs Scality RING
- Zerto vs Storj
- Zerto vs IDrive e2

