Automation Integration · head to head
Browser Use vs Windmill

Browser Use
Automation Integration
Give Browser Use a natural-language task and receive completed work from a managed browser agent
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Windmill
Automation Integration
Open-source developer platform for building scripts, workflows, and internal apps
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Browser Use annual plans cost 10 months of fees but provide 12 months of credits (Dev: $290/year with $360 credits); Windmill free self-hosted tier caps SSO users at 10 and workspaces at 3, requiring Enterprise for larger teams.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Browser Use and Windmill actually diverge.
| Attribute | Browser Use | Windmill |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | open-source |
| Platforms | Web | web, api, linux, windows, mac |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Browser Use
Nothing recorded that Windmill does not also cover.
Only in Windmill
- Script-to-workflow engine
- Auto-generated UIs
- Self-hosted deployment
- Git sync
- SSO support
- Audit logs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Browser Use
- Web automationnot Windmill
- Browser task automationnot Windmill
Windmill
- Turning ad-hoc scripts into scheduled jobs and APIsnot Browser Use
- Building internal tools from existing Python/TypeScript codenot Browser Use
- Self-hosted automation for engineering teamsnot Browser Use
- Orchestrating multi-language workflowsnot Browser Use
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Browser Use
- Annual plans cost 10 months of fees but provide 12 months of credits (Dev: $290/year with $360 credits)
- Proxy costs extra: $4-5/GB managed residential proxy
- Cloud browser sessions add $0.02/hour minimum 1 minute
Windmill
- Free self-hosted tier caps SSO users at 10 and workspaces at 3, requiring Enterprise for larger teams.
- Compute unit and seat-based pricing (developer vs. operator seats, worker compute units) adds pricing complexity beyond a flat monthly fee.
- Email triggers are capped at 100/day on the free tier, limiting event-driven use cases without upgrading.
- Smaller ecosystem of pre-built integrations compared to more established automation tools like n8n.
Pricing, plan by plan
Browser Use
Free- FreeFree
- 10 agent tasks/month
- 3 concurrent sessions
- Dev$29/month
- $29 monthly credits
- 25 concurrent sessions
- Business$299/month
- $299 monthly credits
- 200 concurrent sessions
- Scaleup$999/month
- $999 monthly credits
- 500 concurrent sessions
Windmill
Free- Free / Open-sourceFree
- Unlimited executions
- Self-hosted deployment
- Max 10 users with SSO
- Enterprise$120/month
- Unlimited executions and workspaces
- Uncapped SSO seats
- 24/7 priority support (3-hour response)
Which should you pick?
Choose Windmill if
- You need script-to-workflow engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api, linux, windows, mac.
- You also want auto-generated uis.
Questions people ask
- Is Browser Use or Windmill better?
- Neither clearly leads. Browser Use starts at Free and Windmill at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Browser Use or Windmill?
- Browser Use starts at Free and Windmill at Free.
- Does Browser Use or Windmill run on more platforms?
- Browser Use runs on Web. Windmill runs on web, api, linux, windows, mac.
- Can I use Browser Use for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Browser Use best used for?
- Browser Use is most often used for web automation, browser task automation. Of those, web automation and browser task automation are not what Windmill is typically brought in for.
- What can Browser Use do that Windmill cannot?
- Windmill covers Script-to-workflow engine, Auto-generated UIs, Self-hosted deployment, Git sync.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Browser Use: How much does Browser Use's Dev plan cost?
The Dev plan costs $29 per month and includes $29 in monthly agent credits, 25 concurrent sessions, and browser automation capabilities.
SourceWindmill: What does Windmill cost?
Windmill's Free and Open-source edition is $0/month for self-hosted use with unlimited executions, while Enterprise starts at $120/month with unlimited workspaces and uncapped SSO seats, priced further by developer/operator seats and compute units.
SourceBrowser Use: What is the cost of Browser Use's cloud browser sessions?
Cloud browser sessions cost $0.02 per browser-hour with a one-minute minimum, rounded up to the nearest minute.
SourceWindmill: Is there a free plan and what are its limits?
The free self-hosted plan supports unlimited executions but caps SSO at 10 users, workspaces at 3, groups/permissions at 4, and email triggers at 100 per day.
SourceBrowser Use: Does Browser Use offer a free plan?
Browser Use's free plan includes 10 agent tasks per month and 3 concurrent sessions at no cost, available without payment information.
SourceWindmill: How is usage metered on Windmill Enterprise?
Enterprise usage is metered through seats (developer seats at $20/month, operator seats at $10/month) and compute units, e.g. $100/month for 2 standard-worker compute units.
SourceBrowser Use: How much do Browser Use's annual subscriptions save compared to monthly?
Annual subscriptions cost 10 months of fees: Dev costs $290/year with $360 credits, Business costs $2,990/year with $3,600 credits, and Scaleup costs $9,990/year with $12,000 credits.
SourceWindmill: What happens to a self-hosted Windmill deployment if the company shuts down?
The pricing page addresses this directly as an FAQ topic, noting that self-hosted applications built on the open-source edition can continue running independently of Windmill the company.
SourceRelated pages
More on Browser Use
Other head to heads
- Browser Use vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Browser Use vs Zapier
- Browser Use vs n8n
- Browser Use vs MuleSoft
- Browser Use vs Temporal
- Browser Use vs CrewAI
- Browser Use vs Autonoly
- Browser Use vs Browserbase
- Browser Use vs Decodable
- Browser Use vs Trigger.dev
- Browser Use vs Dagster
- Browser Use vs RudderStack
- Browser Use vs Stitch
- Browser Use vs Talend
- Browser Use vs Tealium
- Browser Use vs Tines
- Browser Use vs Xano
- Browser Use vs Nango
- Browser Use vs Airbyte
- Browser Use vs Flowable
- Browser Use vs Meltano
- Browser Use vs Grouparoo
- Browser Use vs Activiti
- Browser Use vs jBPM
- Browser Use vs Merge
- Browser Use vs Camunda
- Browser Use vs Flowise
- Browser Use vs Automate.io
- Browser Use vs Boomi
- Windmill vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Windmill vs Zapier
- Windmill vs n8n
- Windmill vs MuleSoft
- Windmill vs Temporal
- Windmill vs CrewAI
- Windmill vs Autonoly
- Windmill vs Browserbase
- Windmill vs Decodable
- Windmill vs Trigger.dev
- Windmill vs Dagster
- Windmill vs RudderStack
- Windmill vs Stitch
- Windmill vs Talend
- Windmill vs Tealium
- Windmill vs Tines
- Windmill vs Xano
- Windmill vs Nango
- Windmill vs Airbyte
- Windmill vs Flowable
- Windmill vs Meltano
- Windmill vs Grouparoo
- Windmill vs Activiti
- Windmill vs jBPM
- Windmill vs Merge
- Windmill vs Camunda
- Windmill vs Flowise
- Windmill vs Automate.io
- Windmill vs Boomi
