Manufacturing · head to head
PROGNOST Systems vs TrendMiner

PROGNOST Systems
Manufacturing
SIL 3 rated online monitoring and diagnostics for reciprocating compressors
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

TrendMiner
Manufacturing
Search-driven time series analytics for process engineers, now owned by Proemion rather than Software AG
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: PROGNOST Systems nothing about price is published, and because the system is instrumented per machine train, there is no per-point comparison that lets a buyer benchmark it against general-purpose condition monitoring.; TrendMiner ownership moved from Software AG to Proemion in a 47 million euro sale during the Silver Lake break-up, so the integration roadmap tied to webMethods and Cumulocity is gone and the new owner is far smaller.
- They diverge on capability: PROGNOST Systems covers Segmented vibration analysis, TrendMiner covers Pattern search.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which PROGNOST Systems and TrendMiner actually diverge.
| Attribute | PROGNOST Systems | TrendMiner |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows, On-premise | Web, Windows, Linux |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in PROGNOST Systems
- Segmented vibration analysis
- Dynamic rod position
- Online pV diagram
- Dynamic rod load
- SIL 3 machine protection
- Damage pattern library
- PROGNOST-Predictor
- Remote expert service
Only in TrendMiner
- Pattern search
- Value-based search
- Monitors
- Soft sensors
- Context items
- Dashboards
- Machine learning models
- ContextHub
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
PROGNOST Systems
- A refinery hydrogen recycle compressor where an unplanned trip costs more per day than the monitoring systemnot TrendMiner
- Replacing a separate protection system and a separate condition monitoring system with one SIL 3 rated installationnot TrendMiner
- Gas transmission stations needing valve and rider ring wear diagnosis without opening the machinenot TrendMiner
- A plant moving reciprocating compressors from time-based overhaul to condition-based intervals with evidence a regulator will acceptnot TrendMiner
TrendMiner
- Finding every prior occurrence of a heat exchanger fouling signature to estimate cleaning frequency from history rather than from a rule of thumbnot PROGNOST Systems
- Comparing golden batches against off-spec ones in a pharmaceutical process without exporting to a data science teamnot PROGNOST Systems
- Building a monitor that flags the early temperature signature that preceded the last three compressor tripsnot PROGNOST Systems
- Giving a process engineer a way to answer a question in an afternoon that previously required a historian export and a spreadsheet weeknot PROGNOST Systems
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
PROGNOST Systems
- Nothing about price is published, and because the system is instrumented per machine train, there is no per-point comparison that lets a buyer benchmark it against general-purpose condition monitoring.
- Installation requires proximity probes, rod position sensors and pressure instrumentation on the machine, which usually means a planned outage and mechanical work before any data exists.
- The value is concentrated in reciprocating compressors; for general rotating equipment across a whole plant it is a far more expensive route than a broad vibration programme.
- SIL 3 certification brings the configuration into functional safety scope, so changes to thresholds and logic go through management of change rather than being adjusted by a reliability engineer.
- The company is small and German-based, so response times and spares logistics for remote sites depend on a partner network rather than a global direct service organisation.
TrendMiner
- Ownership moved from Software AG to Proemion in a 47 million euro sale during the Silver Lake break-up, so the integration roadmap tied to webMethods and Cumulocity is gone and the new owner is far smaller.
- It is built for continuous time series and handles discrete manufacturing, relational quality data and event-driven production poorly, so plants that are not continuous process get limited value.
- Value depends entirely on historian data quality and tag naming; sites with inconsistent tag descriptions and missing asset context spend months on data preparation before the search features are usable.
- Licensing is by named analyst user, and the population who genuinely use pattern search is small, so organisations that buy broadly pay for seats that log in occasionally.
- It reads history but does not fix it: there is no data collection layer, so an existing historian is mandatory and TrendMiner is always an additional cost on top of it.
Pricing, plan by plan
PROGNOST Systems
On request- PROGNOST-NT$undefined/year
- Priced per machine train as an instrumented system
- Sensors, proximity probes, rod position and pressure instrumentation included in scope
- Installation typically requires a machine outage for probe fitting
TrendMiner
On request- TrendMiner$undefined/year
- Annual subscription sized by named users and connected historian tag volume
- Separate licence tiers for full analyst users and view-only dashboard consumers
- Historian connectors quoted per source system
Which should you pick?
Choose PROGNOST Systems if
- You need segmented vibration analysis.
- You work on Windows, On-premise.
- You also want dynamic rod position.
Choose TrendMiner if
- You need pattern search.
- You work on Web, Windows, Linux.
- You also want value-based search.
Questions people ask
- Is PROGNOST Systems or TrendMiner better?
- Neither clearly leads. PROGNOST Systems starts at On request and TrendMiner at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, PROGNOST Systems or TrendMiner?
- PROGNOST Systems starts at On request and TrendMiner at On request.
- Does PROGNOST Systems or TrendMiner run on more platforms?
- PROGNOST Systems runs on Windows, On-premise. TrendMiner runs on Web, Windows, Linux.
- What is PROGNOST Systems best used for?
- PROGNOST Systems is most often used for a refinery hydrogen recycle compressor where an unplanned trip costs more per day than the monitoring system, replacing a separate protection system and a separate condition monitoring system with one sil 3 rated installation, gas transmission stations needing valve and rider ring wear diagnosis without opening the machine, a plant moving reciprocating compressors from time-based overhaul to condition-based intervals with evidence a regulator will accept. Of those, a refinery hydrogen recycle compressor where an unplanned trip costs more per day than the monitoring system and replacing a separate protection system and a separate condition monitoring system with one sil 3 rated installation are not what TrendMiner is typically brought in for.
- What can PROGNOST Systems do that TrendMiner cannot?
- PROGNOST Systems covers Segmented vibration analysis, Dynamic rod position, Online pV diagram, Dynamic rod load. TrendMiner covers Pattern search, Value-based search, Monitors, Soft sensors.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
PROGNOST Systems: Does it replace the compressor protection system?
It can. PROGNOST-NT is SIL 3 rated for machine protection, which is the main reason sites choose it over advisory-only monitoring.
TrendMiner: Who owns TrendMiner now?
Proemion, a German industrial analytics company backed by Battery Ventures, which bought it from Software AG for 47 million euros in 2024.
PROGNOST Systems: Can it be retrofitted to an existing compressor?
Yes, but fitting rod position and internal instrumentation generally needs a machine outage.
TrendMiner: Does it replace my historian?
No. It connects to PI, IP.21, PHD, Exaquantum and others and reads from them. The historian remains the system of record.
PROGNOST Systems: Does it work on centrifugal machines?
PROGNOST offers products for general rotating equipment, but the differentiated diagnostics are for reciprocating compressors.
TrendMiner: Do I need a data scientist to use it?
No, and that is the point. The pattern search and soft sensor tooling are aimed at process engineers with no coding background.
PROGNOST Systems: Is it available on new Burckhardt machines?
Yes, Burckhardt Compression offers PROGNOST-NT as a factory-fitted condition monitoring option.
TrendMiner: Is pricing per user?
Yes, largely, with tiers for analyst and view-only access plus charges for historian connectors and data volume.
Related pages
More on PROGNOST Systems
Other head to heads
- PROGNOST Systems vs Ignition
- PROGNOST Systems vs Augury
- PROGNOST Systems vs SKF Enlight Centre
- PROGNOST Systems vs Erbessd Instruments
- PROGNOST Systems vs KCF Technologies
- PROGNOST Systems vs Petasense
- PROGNOST Systems vs Sensemore
- PROGNOST Systems vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- PROGNOST Systems vs eMaint
- PROGNOST Systems vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- PROGNOST Systems vs Poseidon Systems
- PROGNOST Systems vs MOVUS
- PROGNOST Systems vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- PROGNOST Systems vs Simplify3D
- PROGNOST Systems vs Xometry
- PROGNOST Systems vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- PROGNOST Systems vs Sight Machine
- PROGNOST Systems vs Seeq
- PROGNOST Systems vs Oden Technologies
- PROGNOST Systems vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- PROGNOST Systems vs Flow Software
- PROGNOST Systems vs ABB 800xA
- PROGNOST Systems vs AVEVA System Platform
- PROGNOST Systems vs Hippo CMMS
- PROGNOST Systems vs 3YOURMIND
- TrendMiner vs Ignition
- TrendMiner vs Augury
- TrendMiner vs SKF Enlight Centre
- TrendMiner vs Erbessd Instruments
- TrendMiner vs KCF Technologies
- TrendMiner vs Petasense
- TrendMiner vs Sensemore
- TrendMiner vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- TrendMiner vs eMaint
- TrendMiner vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- TrendMiner vs Poseidon Systems
- TrendMiner vs MOVUS
- TrendMiner vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- TrendMiner vs Simplify3D
- TrendMiner vs Xometry
- TrendMiner vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- TrendMiner vs Sight Machine
- TrendMiner vs Seeq
- TrendMiner vs Oden Technologies
- TrendMiner vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- TrendMiner vs Flow Software
- TrendMiner vs ABB 800xA
- TrendMiner vs AVEVA System Platform
- TrendMiner vs Hippo CMMS
- TrendMiner vs 3YOURMIND
