Utilities · head to head
Sedaru vs TreeSize

Sedaru
Utilities
Water utility asset management and field operations built on top of Esri ArcGIS
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

TreeSize
Utilities
Windows disk space analyser whose free edition may be used commercially, with paid tiers for scheduled reporting
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only TreeSize has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Sedaru the Esri dependency is absolute: an ArcGIS licence is a separate and substantial cost outside the Sedaru contract, and utilities without ArcGIS must buy into that platform before Sedaru is even usable.; TreeSize it traverses directories rather than reading the NTFS master file table, so a local drive scan takes noticeably longer than the fastest alternatives.
- They diverge on capability: Sedaru covers Esri-native asset model, TreeSize covers Free edition licensed for business.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Sedaru and TreeSize actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (quote), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Utilities).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Sedaru
- Esri-native asset model
- Field crew mobile
- Hydraulic model integration
- SCADA alarm context
- Capital planning
- Customer service linkage
Only in TreeSize
- Free edition licensed for business
- Network share scanning
- Reports by age and owner
- Duplicate file search
- Scheduled scans
- Exports
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Sedaru
- A water utility whose crews already work from ArcGIS maps and that wants work orders on the same map rather than in a separate CMMSnot TreeSize
- A wastewater authority prioritising collection system renewal by risk and condition rather than by age alonenot TreeSize
- Giving field crews offline access to network asset data and work history in areas with no mobile coveragenot TreeSize
- A utility trying to connect SCADA alarms to the physical assets and recent work that explain them, instead of reading alarms in isolationnot TreeSize
TreeSize
- Deploying one free disk analyser across a company without a personal-use licence problemnot Sedaru
- Reporting on a file server by owner and file age before an archiving or quota decisionnot Sedaru
- Finding duplicate files spread across departmental network sharesnot Sedaru
- Producing a storage report for someone who will read a PDF but not run a scannot Sedaru
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Sedaru
- The Esri dependency is absolute: an ArcGIS licence is a separate and substantial cost outside the Sedaru contract, and utilities without ArcGIS must buy into that platform before Sedaru is even usable.
- Sedaru inherits GIS data quality, so a utility with an incomplete or stale geodatabase discovers the gaps in front of field crews rather than fixing them, and the data remediation project is not in the Sedaru quote.
- The North American water focus means limited relevance and limited implementation support outside that market, particularly for utilities operating under European or Australian regulatory reporting requirements.
- Nothing is published on price and the product is sold within a large corporate portfolio, so a small utility has little basis for judging whether the quoted subscription is competitive.
- It is a water and wastewater product; a municipality wanting one asset system across water, roads, parks and facilities will need a broader public works platform alongside it.
TreeSize
- It traverses directories rather than reading the NTFS master file table, so a local drive scan takes noticeably longer than the fastest alternatives.
- It is Windows only, so file servers running Linux or a NAS appliance need a different tool or a share mounted from a Windows machine.
- Useful features are spread across three paid tiers, so the single capability a buyer needs frequently sits two tiers above the one they were considering.
- Scanning large network shares generates significant traffic and takes hours, which means it has to be scheduled rather than run when someone asks the question.
- Pricing is per licence with separate maintenance, so an accurate total for a team requires a quote rather than a figure from the website.
Pricing, plan by plan
Sedaru
On request- Sedaru$undefined/year
- Subscription sized on utility scale and module selection
- Esri ArcGIS licence required and purchased separately from Esri
- Implementation and GIS data preparation quoted as services
TreeSize
Free- TreeSize FreeFree
- Folder size analysis and treemap
- Licensed for private and commercial use
- Basic exports
- TreeSize Personal, Professional and Enterprise$undefined/year
- File search, duplicate detection and full exports
- Network share and file server scanning
- Scheduled unattended scans and stored reports
Which should you pick?
Choose Sedaru if
- You need esri-native asset model.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud.
- You also want field crew mobile.
Choose TreeSize if
- You need free edition licensed for business.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want network share scanning.
Questions people ask
- Is Sedaru or TreeSize better?
- Neither clearly leads. Sedaru starts at On request and TreeSize at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Sedaru or TreeSize?
- TreeSize has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Sedaru and Free for TreeSize.
- Does Sedaru or TreeSize run on more platforms?
- Sedaru runs on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud. TreeSize runs on Windows.
- Can I use TreeSize for free?
- Yes. TreeSize has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sedaru starts at On request.
- What is Sedaru best used for?
- Sedaru is most often used for a water utility whose crews already work from arcgis maps and that wants work orders on the same map rather than in a separate cmms, a wastewater authority prioritising collection system renewal by risk and condition rather than by age alone, giving field crews offline access to network asset data and work history in areas with no mobile coverage, a utility trying to connect scada alarms to the physical assets and recent work that explain them, instead of reading alarms in isolation. Of those, a water utility whose crews already work from arcgis maps and that wants work orders on the same map rather than in a separate cmms and a wastewater authority prioritising collection system renewal by risk and condition rather than by age alone are not what TreeSize is typically brought in for.
- What can Sedaru do that TreeSize cannot?
- Sedaru covers Esri-native asset model, Field crew mobile, Hydraulic model integration, SCADA alarm context. TreeSize covers Free edition licensed for business, Network share scanning, Reports by age and owner, Duplicate file search.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Sedaru: Do I need Esri ArcGIS to use Sedaru?
Yes. Sedaru is built on the ArcGIS geodatabase and the Esri licence is a separate purchase from Esri, not part of the Sedaru subscription.
TreeSize: Is TreeSize Free really free for business use?
Yes. JAM Software licenses the free edition for private and commercial use, which is the main reason it appears on corporate machines where other free analysers are not permitted.
Sedaru: Who owns Sedaru?
Aquatic Informatics, which is part of Veralto, the water quality group spun out of Danaher in 2023.
TreeSize: Why is it slower than WizTree?
Method. WizTree reads the NTFS master file table; TreeSize walks the directory tree, which is slower but works on network shares and non-NTFS volumes.
Sedaru: Does Sedaru replace a CMMS?
For water network assets, largely yes. For plant equipment and facilities maintenance many utilities still run a separate CMMS.
TreeSize: Can it scan a NAS or Linux file server?
It scans them as network shares over SMB, with the speed penalty that implies. There is no agent that runs on the server itself.
Sedaru: Is pricing published?
No. Subscriptions are sized on the utility and quoted, with implementation and data preparation charged as services.
TreeSize: What does the Enterprise tier add?
Scheduled unattended scans, stored historical results and reporting across servers, which is the difference between a cleanup tool and a storage reporting system.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Sedaru vs EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert
- Sedaru vs VTScada
- Sedaru vs Calsense
- Sedaru vs GParted
- Sedaru vs Kap
- Sedaru vs Find My
- Sedaru vs CrystalDiskInfo
- Sedaru vs Google Lens
- Sedaru vs HWiNFO
- Sedaru vs Truecaller
- Sedaru vs BetterTouchTool
- Sedaru vs CCleaner
- Sedaru vs Everything
- Sedaru vs PeaZip
- Sedaru vs WinDirStat
- Sedaru vs WizTree
- Sedaru vs AutoHotkey
- Sedaru vs Shottr
- Sedaru vs Starbucks
- Sedaru vs Transmission
- Sedaru vs Hazel
- Sedaru vs Magnet
- Sedaru vs Rclone
- TreeSize vs EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert
- TreeSize vs VTScada
- TreeSize vs Calsense
- TreeSize vs GParted
- TreeSize vs Kap
- TreeSize vs Find My
- TreeSize vs CrystalDiskInfo
- TreeSize vs Google Lens
- TreeSize vs HWiNFO
- TreeSize vs Truecaller
- TreeSize vs BetterTouchTool
- TreeSize vs CCleaner
- TreeSize vs Everything
- TreeSize vs PeaZip
- TreeSize vs WinDirStat
- TreeSize vs WizTree
- TreeSize vs AutoHotkey
- TreeSize vs Shottr
- TreeSize vs Starbucks
- TreeSize vs Transmission
- TreeSize vs Hazel
- TreeSize vs Magnet
- TreeSize vs Rclone
