File Storage · head to head
Tigris vs Wasabi

Tigris
File Storage
Globally distributed S3-compatible object storage with zero egress fees
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Tigris has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Tigris lowest tier still more expensive than some cold storage alternatives; Wasabi 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- They diverge on capability: Tigris covers Global Distribution, Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Tigris and Wasabi actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Tigris
- Global Distribution
- Zero Egress Fees
- S3 Compatibility
- Multiple Storage Classes
- Object Notifications
- API Access
Only in Wasabi
- Hot Cloud Storage
- S3 Compatible API
- Object Lock
- Versioning
- Multi-region
- Data Migration Tools
- Immutability
- Ransomware Protection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Tigris
- Storing and versioning AI training datasets without egress penaltiesnot Wasabi
- Distributing model checkpoints and artifacts globallynot Wasabi
- Serving static assets with low latency across regionsnot Wasabi
- Multi-cloud data portability with standardized APInot Wasabi
Wasabi
- Backup and recoverynot Tigris
- Media storagenot Tigris
- Archive replacementnot Tigris
- Ransomware protectionnot Tigris
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Tigris
- Lowest tier still more expensive than some cold storage alternatives
- Retrieval charges on infrequent access tier add cost variability
- Limited to object storage, no file system semantics
- Archive retrieval requires planning ahead
Wasabi
- 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- Significantly smaller global footprint than AWS with only 16 regions, resulting in higher latency for users in underserved regions
- Performance can degrade with high-volume transactions requiring throughput management strategies
- Hot storage only, no cold/archival storage tier for long-term data at lower cost
- Support responsiveness gaps with teams experiencing multi-day waits for critical issue resolution
Pricing, plan by plan
Tigris
Free- Standard Storage$0.02/GB/month
- Frequently accessed data
- No retrieval charges
- Free data egress
- Infrequent Access$0.01/GB/month
- Lower storage cost
- Retrieval: $0.01 per GB
- 30-day minimum retention
- Archive$0.004/GB/month
- Lowest storage cost
- Free retrieval
- 90-day minimum retention
- Archive Instant Retrieval$0.004/GB/month
- Archive storage cost
- Instant retrieval: $0.03 per GB
- 90-day minimum retention
Wasabi
$7.99/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Wasabi review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Tigris if
- You need global distribution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, API, CLI.
- You also want zero egress fees.
Choose Wasabi if
- You need hot cloud storage.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want s3 compatible api.
Questions people ask
- Is Tigris or Wasabi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Tigris starts at Free and Wasabi at $7.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Tigris or Wasabi?
- Tigris has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Tigris and $7.99/month for Wasabi.
- Does Tigris or Wasabi run on more platforms?
- Tigris runs on Web, API, CLI. Wasabi runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Tigris for free?
- Yes. Tigris has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Wasabi starts at $7.99/month.
- What is Tigris best used for?
- Tigris is most often used for storing and versioning ai training datasets without egress penalties, distributing model checkpoints and artifacts globally, serving static assets with low latency across regions, multi-cloud data portability with standardized api. Of those, storing and versioning ai training datasets without egress penalties and distributing model checkpoints and artifacts globally are not what Wasabi is typically brought in for.
- What can Tigris do that Wasabi cannot?
- Tigris covers Global Distribution, Zero Egress Fees, S3 Compatibility, Multiple Storage Classes. Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage, S3 Compatible API, Object Lock, Versioning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Tigris: Is there a free tier?
Yes, new users receive 5 GB of Standard storage monthly plus 10,000 Class A and 100,000 Class B requests at no cost.
SourceWasabi: What is Wasabi's pricing structure?
Wasabi offers pay-as-you-go pricing at $7.99 per TB per month as of July 2026, with no egress or API request fees. Reserved capacity plans are available for multi-year terms with volume discounts.
SourceTigris: What are the request costs?
Class A requests cost $0.005 per 1,000 requests, Class B requests cost $0.0005 per 1,000 requests. DELETE and CANCEL operations are free.
SourceWasabi: Does Wasabi charge for data downloads or API calls?
No. Wasabi includes zero egress fees and zero API request fees, which is a major cost advantage over AWS S3. Customers can plan their budget to the penny without worrying about surprise data transfer charges.
SourceTigris: Do I get charged for data egress?
No, Tigris provides free data egress across all storage tiers.
SourceWasabi: Is there a minimum storage duration requirement?
Yes. Wasabi enforces a 90-day minimum storage term. Users who delete data before 90 days are still charged for the full 90-day period.
SourceWasabi: Is Wasabi S3-compatible?
Yes. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is fully S3-compatible, meaning organizations can integrate it into existing workflows without rewriting application code used with AWS S3.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Tigris vs Cloudflare R2
- Tigris vs Scality RING
- Tigris vs Panzura
- Tigris vs Storj
- Tigris vs Ceph
- Tigris vs Cloudian
- Tigris vs IDrive e2
- Tigris vs MinIO
- Tigris vs TrueNAS
- Tigris vs pCloud
- Tigris vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Tigris vs Carbonite
- Tigris vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Tigris vs Nextcloud
- Tigris vs Zerto
- Tigris vs LucidLink
- Tigris vs IDrive
- Tigris vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Tigris vs DigitalOcean
- Tigris vs Hetzner Cloud
- Tigris vs Scaleway
- Tigris vs Linode
- Tigris vs Vultr
- Tigris vs Zeabur
- Tigris vs Porter
- Tigris vs Contabo
- Tigris vs Encore
- Tigris vs Google Cloud Platform
- Tigris vs Microsoft Azure
- Tigris vs HAProxy
- Tigris vs IBM Cloud
- Tigris vs kind
- Tigris vs Koyeb
- Tigris vs Kustomize
- Tigris vs Linkerd
- Wasabi vs Cloudflare R2
- Wasabi vs Scality RING
- Wasabi vs Panzura
- Wasabi vs Storj
- Wasabi vs Ceph
- Wasabi vs Cloudian
- Wasabi vs IDrive e2
- Wasabi vs MinIO
- Wasabi vs TrueNAS
- Wasabi vs pCloud
- Wasabi vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Wasabi vs Carbonite
- Wasabi vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Wasabi vs Nextcloud
- Wasabi vs Zerto
- Wasabi vs LucidLink
- Wasabi vs IDrive
- Wasabi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Wasabi vs DigitalOcean
- Wasabi vs Hetzner Cloud
- Wasabi vs Scaleway
- Wasabi vs Linode
- Wasabi vs Vultr
- Wasabi vs Zeabur
- Wasabi vs Porter
- Wasabi vs Contabo
- Wasabi vs Encore
- Wasabi vs Google Cloud Platform
- Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure
- Wasabi vs HAProxy
- Wasabi vs IBM Cloud
- Wasabi vs kind
- Wasabi vs Koyeb
- Wasabi vs Kustomize
- Wasabi vs Linkerd

