File Storage & Backup · head to head
pCloud vs Wasabi

pCloud
File Storage & Backup
Prices are final. No setup fees or other hidden charges
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Wasabi
Cloud & Infrastructure
Hot cloud storage without egress fees
- From
- $7.99/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: pCloud headline lifetime prices are discounted promotional prices; the Premium 500GB lifetime plan is listed at $299 struck through down to $199, and Ultra 10TB at $1,890 down to $1,190, so the full non-promotional price is materially higher; Wasabi 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which pCloud and Wasabi actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in pCloud
Nothing recorded that Wasabi does not also cover.
Only in Wasabi
- Hot Cloud Storage
- S3 Compatible API
- Object Lock
- Versioning
- Multi-region
- Data Migration Tools
- Immutability
- Ransomware Protection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
pCloud
No use cases recorded yet. See the pCloud review.
Wasabi
- Backup and recoverynot pCloud
- Media storagenot pCloud
- Archive replacementnot pCloud
- Ransomware protectionnot pCloud
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
pCloud
- Headline lifetime prices are discounted promotional prices; the Premium 500GB lifetime plan is listed at $299 struck through down to $199, and Ultra 10TB at $1,890 down to $1,190, so the full non-promotional price is materially higher
- Ultra 10TB plan's download link traffic is capped at 2TB, the same limit as the much smaller Premium Plus 2TB plan, despite the 5x storage difference
Wasabi
- 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- Significantly smaller global footprint than AWS with only 16 regions, resulting in higher latency for users in underserved regions
- Performance can degrade with high-volume transactions requiring throughput management strategies
- Hot storage only, no cold/archival storage tier for long-term data at lower cost
- Support responsiveness gaps with teams experiencing multi-day waits for critical issue resolution
Pricing, plan by plan
pCloud
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the pCloud review.
Wasabi
$7.99/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Wasabi review.
Which should you pick?
Choose pCloud if
Nothing in the data separates pCloud from Wasabi on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose Wasabi if
- You need hot cloud storage.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want s3 compatible api.
Questions people ask
- Is pCloud or Wasabi better?
- Neither clearly leads. pCloud starts at On request and Wasabi at $7.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, pCloud or Wasabi?
- pCloud starts at On request and Wasabi at $7.99/month.
- Does pCloud or Wasabi run on more platforms?
- pCloud runs on Web. Wasabi runs on Web, API.
- What can pCloud do that Wasabi cannot?
- Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage, S3 Compatible API, Object Lock, Versioning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Wasabi: What is Wasabi's pricing structure?
Wasabi offers pay-as-you-go pricing at $7.99 per TB per month as of July 2026, with no egress or API request fees. Reserved capacity plans are available for multi-year terms with volume discounts.
SourceWasabi: Does Wasabi charge for data downloads or API calls?
No. Wasabi includes zero egress fees and zero API request fees, which is a major cost advantage over AWS S3. Customers can plan their budget to the penny without worrying about surprise data transfer charges.
SourceWasabi: Is there a minimum storage duration requirement?
Yes. Wasabi enforces a 90-day minimum storage term. Users who delete data before 90 days are still charged for the full 90-day period.
SourceWasabi: Is Wasabi S3-compatible?
Yes. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is fully S3-compatible, meaning organizations can integrate it into existing workflows without rewriting application code used with AWS S3.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- pCloud vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- pCloud vs Carbonite
- pCloud vs Backblaze
- pCloud vs Barracuda Backup
- pCloud vs Arq Backup
- pCloud vs CrashPlan
- pCloud vs Duplicati
- pCloud vs Zerto
- pCloud vs Box
- pCloud vs IDrive
- pCloud vs Microsoft OneDrive
- pCloud vs Nextcloud
- pCloud vs Sync.com
- pCloud vs Tresorit
- pCloud vs TrueNAS
- pCloud vs Veritas NetBackup
- pCloud vs Grafana Cloud
- pCloud vs Neon
- pCloud vs DigitalOcean
- pCloud vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- pCloud vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- pCloud vs Deno Deploy
- pCloud vs Heroku
- pCloud vs Hetzner Cloud
- pCloud vs Linode
- pCloud vs Packer
- pCloud vs Pulumi
- pCloud vs Render
- pCloud vs Upstash
- pCloud vs Vagrant
- pCloud vs Vultr
- pCloud vs Akamai
- pCloud vs Alibaba Cloud
- pCloud vs Chef
- Wasabi vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Wasabi vs Carbonite
- Wasabi vs Backblaze
- Wasabi vs Barracuda Backup
- Wasabi vs Arq Backup
- Wasabi vs CrashPlan
- Wasabi vs Duplicati
- Wasabi vs Zerto
- Wasabi vs Box
- Wasabi vs IDrive
- Wasabi vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Wasabi vs Nextcloud
- Wasabi vs Sync.com
- Wasabi vs Tresorit
- Wasabi vs TrueNAS
- Wasabi vs Veritas NetBackup
- Wasabi vs Grafana Cloud
- Wasabi vs Neon
- Wasabi vs DigitalOcean
- Wasabi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Wasabi vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Wasabi vs Deno Deploy
- Wasabi vs Heroku
- Wasabi vs Hetzner Cloud
- Wasabi vs Linode
- Wasabi vs Packer
- Wasabi vs Pulumi
- Wasabi vs Render
- Wasabi vs Upstash
- Wasabi vs Vagrant
- Wasabi vs Vultr
- Wasabi vs Akamai
- Wasabi vs Alibaba Cloud
- Wasabi vs Chef
