Cloud · head to head
Porter vs Tigris

Tigris
File Storage
Globally distributed S3-compatible object storage with zero egress fees
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Tigris has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Porter pricing based on vCPU and memory can be expensive for small projects; Tigris lowest tier still more expensive than some cold storage alternatives
- They diverge on capability: Porter covers Rapid deployment, Tigris covers Global Distribution.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Porter and Tigris actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Porter
- Rapid deployment
- Multi-cloud support
- Framework agnostic
- DevOps automation
- Enterprise compliance
- Cost optimization
Only in Tigris
- Global Distribution
- Zero Egress Fees
- S3 Compatibility
- Multiple Storage Classes
- Object Notifications
- API Access
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Porter
- Deploying Next.js applications with serverless backendsnot Tigris
- Scaling microservices across multiple cloud providersnot Tigris
- Running applications without dedicated DevOps staffnot Tigris
Tigris
- Storing and versioning AI training datasets without egress penaltiesnot Porter
- Distributing model checkpoints and artifacts globallynot Porter
- Serving static assets with low latency across regionsnot Porter
- Multi-cloud data portability with standardized APInot Porter
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Porter
- Pricing based on vCPU and memory can be expensive for small projects
- Vendor lock-in to Porter platform despite multi-cloud support
- Limited customization for complex infrastructure requirements
Tigris
- Lowest tier still more expensive than some cold storage alternatives
- Retrieval charges on infrequent access tier add cost variability
- Limited to object storage, no file system semantics
- Archive retrieval requires planning ahead
Pricing, plan by plan
Porter
$6/month- Standard$undefined/usage
- RAM: $6 per month per GB
- vCPU: $13 per month per vCPU
- Unlimited applications
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Volume discounts available
- All Standard features
- Premium support
Tigris
Free- Standard Storage$0.02/GB/month
- Frequently accessed data
- No retrieval charges
- Free data egress
- Infrequent Access$0.01/GB/month
- Lower storage cost
- Retrieval: $0.01 per GB
- 30-day minimum retention
- Archive$0.004/GB/month
- Lowest storage cost
- Free retrieval
- 90-day minimum retention
- Archive Instant Retrieval$0.004/GB/month
- Archive storage cost
- Instant retrieval: $0.03 per GB
- 90-day minimum retention
Which should you pick?
Choose Porter if
- You need rapid deployment.
- You work on AWS, GCP, Azure.
- You also want multi-cloud support.
Choose Tigris if
- You need global distribution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, API, CLI.
- You also want zero egress fees.
Questions people ask
- Is Porter or Tigris better?
- Neither clearly leads. Porter starts at $6/month and Tigris at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Porter or Tigris?
- Tigris has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $6/month for Porter and Free for Tigris.
- Does Porter or Tigris run on more platforms?
- Porter runs on AWS, GCP, Azure. Tigris runs on Web, API, CLI.
- Can I use Tigris for free?
- Yes. Tigris has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Porter starts at $6/month.
- What is Porter best used for?
- Porter is most often used for deploying next.js applications with serverless backends, scaling microservices across multiple cloud providers, running applications without dedicated devops staff. Of those, deploying next.js applications with serverless backends and scaling microservices across multiple cloud providers are not what Tigris is typically brought in for.
- What can Porter do that Tigris cannot?
- Porter covers Rapid deployment, Multi-cloud support, Framework agnostic, DevOps automation. Tigris covers Global Distribution, Zero Egress Fees, S3 Compatibility, Multiple Storage Classes.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Porter: How is Porter priced?
Porter uses pay-as-you-go pricing: $6 per month per GB of RAM and $13 per month per vCPU. You only pay for the resources your applications use, not cloud instance capacity.
SourceTigris: Is there a free tier?
Yes, new users receive 5 GB of Standard storage monthly plus 10,000 Class A and 100,000 Class B requests at no cost.
SourcePorter: Does Porter include cloud provider costs?
Porter pricing excludes underlying cloud provider costs (AWS, Azure, GCP), though cloud credits can offset those expenses.
SourceTigris: What are the request costs?
Class A requests cost $0.005 per 1,000 requests, Class B requests cost $0.0005 per 1,000 requests. DELETE and CANCEL operations are free.
SourcePorter: Do startups get special pricing?
Yes, nonprofits receive 50% off standard rates, and startups may qualify for special pricing programs.
SourceTigris: Do I get charged for data egress?
No, Tigris provides free data egress across all storage tiers.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Porter vs Render
- Porter vs Railway
- Porter vs Qovery
- Porter vs Fly.io
- Porter vs Zeabur
- Porter vs CapRover
- Porter vs Coolify
- Porter vs Encore
- Porter vs Heroku
- Porter vs Microsoft Azure
- Porter vs SST
- Porter vs Wasabi
- Porter vs Akamai
- Porter vs Alibaba Cloud
- Porter vs Buildah
- Porter vs Chef
- Porter vs Cilium
- Porter vs Cloudflare R2
- Porter vs Scality RING
- Porter vs Panzura
- Porter vs Storj
- Porter vs Ceph
- Porter vs Cloudian
- Porter vs IDrive e2
- Porter vs MinIO
- Porter vs TrueNAS
- Porter vs pCloud
- Porter vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Porter vs Carbonite
- Porter vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Porter vs Nextcloud
- Porter vs Zerto
- Porter vs LucidLink
- Porter vs IDrive
- Tigris vs Render
- Tigris vs Railway
- Tigris vs Qovery
- Tigris vs Fly.io
- Tigris vs Zeabur
- Tigris vs CapRover
- Tigris vs Coolify
- Tigris vs Encore
- Tigris vs Heroku
- Tigris vs Microsoft Azure
- Tigris vs SST
- Tigris vs Wasabi
- Tigris vs Akamai
- Tigris vs Alibaba Cloud
- Tigris vs Buildah
- Tigris vs Chef
- Tigris vs Cilium
- Tigris vs Cloudflare R2
- Tigris vs Scality RING
- Tigris vs Panzura
- Tigris vs Storj
- Tigris vs Ceph
- Tigris vs Cloudian
- Tigris vs IDrive e2
- Tigris vs MinIO
- Tigris vs TrueNAS
- Tigris vs pCloud
- Tigris vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Tigris vs Carbonite
- Tigris vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Tigris vs Nextcloud
- Tigris vs Zerto
- Tigris vs LucidLink
- Tigris vs IDrive

