Software · head to head
Carbonite vs Wasabi

Carbonite
Software
Simple and reliable cloud backup for businesses
- From
- $6/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Carbonite upload speeds are significantly slower than competitors due to lack of block-level algorithms and multithreading; Wasabi 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- They diverge on capability: Carbonite covers Automatic backup, Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Carbonite and Wasabi actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Carbonite
- Automatic backup
- Continuous protection
- Remote file access
- Bare metal restore
- Compliance support
- Microsoft 365
- Windows Server
- VMware
Only in Wasabi
- Hot Cloud Storage
- S3 Compatible API
- Object Lock
- Versioning
- Multi-region
- Data Migration Tools
- Immutability
- Ransomware Protection
Both cover
- Encryption
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Carbonite
- Data protectionnot Wasabi
- Disaster recoverynot Wasabi
- Business continuitynot Wasabi
- Ransomware protection
- Compliancenot Wasabi
Wasabi
- Backup and recoverynot Carbonite
- Media storagenot Carbonite
- Archive replacementnot Carbonite
- Ransomware protection
Both are used for ransomware protection, on those jobs the choice comes down to price and fit rather than capability.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Carbonite
- Upload speeds are significantly slower than competitors due to lack of block-level algorithms and multithreading
- Bandwidth throttling control is limited, preventing users from managing full bandwidth allocation
- Mobile apps and web access are more limited than sync-first services like Dropbox or Google Drive
- Uses AES-128 encryption instead of industry-standard AES-256
- Hybrid backup support is restricted to professional plans, unavailable for personal users
Wasabi
- 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- Significantly smaller global footprint than AWS with only 16 regions, resulting in higher latency for users in underserved regions
- Performance can degrade with high-volume transactions requiring throughput management strategies
- Hot storage only, no cold/archival storage tier for long-term data at lower cost
- Support responsiveness gaps with teams experiencing multi-day waits for critical issue resolution
Pricing, plan by plan
Carbonite
$6/month- Basic$6/month
- Automatic backup
- Unlimited cloud storage
- Easy restore
Wasabi
$7.99/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Wasabi review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Carbonite if
- You need automatic backup.
- You work on Windows, Mac, Web.
- You also want continuous protection.
Choose Wasabi if
- You need hot cloud storage.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want s3 compatible api.
Questions people ask
- Is Carbonite or Wasabi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Carbonite starts at $6/month and Wasabi at $7.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Carbonite or Wasabi?
- Carbonite starts at $6/month and Wasabi at $7.99/month.
- Does Carbonite or Wasabi run on more platforms?
- Carbonite runs on Windows, Mac, Web. Wasabi runs on Web, API.
- What is Carbonite best used for?
- Carbonite is most often used for data protection, disaster recovery, business continuity, ransomware protection. Of those, data protection and disaster recovery are not what Wasabi is typically brought in for.
- What can Carbonite do that Wasabi cannot?
- Carbonite covers Automatic backup, Continuous protection, Remote file access, Bare metal restore. Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage, S3 Compatible API, Object Lock, Versioning. Both handle Encryption, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Carbonite: Does Carbonite offer unlimited storage?
Yes, Carbonite's personal plans (Safe Basic through Safe Server Ultimate) offer unlimited cloud storage, though business plans have tiered storage starting at 250 GB.
SourceWasabi: What is Wasabi's pricing structure?
Wasabi offers pay-as-you-go pricing at $7.99 per TB per month as of July 2026, with no egress or API request fees. Reserved capacity plans are available for multi-year terms with volume discounts.
SourceCarbonite: What is Carbonite's pricing?
Personal plans range from $4.91 to $83.33 per month with annual billing. Business plans start around $50-$75 per endpoint annually, with volume discounts available for multi-year contracts.
SourceWasabi: Does Wasabi charge for data downloads or API calls?
No. Wasabi includes zero egress fees and zero API request fees, which is a major cost advantage over AWS S3. Customers can plan their budget to the penny without worrying about surprise data transfer charges.
SourceCarbonite: How fast are Carbonite's upload speeds?
Carbonite's upload speeds are notably slow and are consistently identified as the platform's main weakness. The lack of block-level algorithms and multithreading contributes to these speed limitations.
SourceWasabi: Is there a minimum storage duration requirement?
Yes. Wasabi enforces a 90-day minimum storage term. Users who delete data before 90 days are still charged for the full 90-day period.
SourceCarbonite: What encryption does Carbonite use?
Carbonite uses AES-128 encryption at rest, which is an unusual choice in 2026 when AES-256 is the industry standard.
SourceWasabi: Is Wasabi S3-compatible?
Yes. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is fully S3-compatible, meaning organizations can integrate it into existing workflows without rewriting application code used with AWS S3.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Carbonite vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Carbonite vs Backblaze
- Carbonite vs Barracuda Backup
- Carbonite vs Arq Backup
- Carbonite vs CrashPlan
- Carbonite vs Duplicati
- Carbonite vs Zerto
- Carbonite vs Box
- Carbonite vs IDrive
- Carbonite vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Carbonite vs Nextcloud
- Carbonite vs pCloud
- Carbonite vs Sync.com
- Carbonite vs Tresorit
- Carbonite vs TrueNAS
- Carbonite vs Veritas NetBackup
- Carbonite vs Grafana Cloud
- Carbonite vs Neon
- Carbonite vs DigitalOcean
- Carbonite vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Carbonite vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Carbonite vs Deno Deploy
- Carbonite vs Heroku
- Carbonite vs Hetzner Cloud
- Carbonite vs Linode
- Carbonite vs Packer
- Carbonite vs Pulumi
- Carbonite vs Render
- Carbonite vs Upstash
- Carbonite vs Vagrant
- Carbonite vs Vultr
- Carbonite vs Akamai
- Carbonite vs Alibaba Cloud
- Carbonite vs Chef
- Wasabi vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Wasabi vs Backblaze
- Wasabi vs Barracuda Backup
- Wasabi vs Arq Backup
- Wasabi vs CrashPlan
- Wasabi vs Duplicati
- Wasabi vs Zerto
- Wasabi vs Box
- Wasabi vs IDrive
- Wasabi vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Wasabi vs Nextcloud
- Wasabi vs pCloud
- Wasabi vs Sync.com
- Wasabi vs Tresorit
- Wasabi vs TrueNAS
- Wasabi vs Veritas NetBackup
- Wasabi vs Grafana Cloud
- Wasabi vs Neon
- Wasabi vs DigitalOcean
- Wasabi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Wasabi vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Wasabi vs Deno Deploy
- Wasabi vs Heroku
- Wasabi vs Hetzner Cloud
- Wasabi vs Linode
- Wasabi vs Packer
- Wasabi vs Pulumi
- Wasabi vs Render
- Wasabi vs Upstash
- Wasabi vs Vagrant
- Wasabi vs Vultr
- Wasabi vs Akamai
- Wasabi vs Alibaba Cloud
- Wasabi vs Chef

