Technology · head to head
Thought Machine vs Tuum

Thought Machine
Technology
Cloud native core banking where products are written as smart contracts
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Tuum
APIs
Modular core banking platform from Estonia, formerly branded Modularbank
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Thought Machine a core replacement is a two to four year programme at an established bank, and the licence is a minority of total cost against system integrator fees, parallel running and data migration.; Tuum it is a smaller, younger company than Mambu, so it has fewer live reference deployments and a shorter track record to evaluate risk against.
- They diverge on capability: Thought Machine covers Smart contract product engine, Tuum covers Modular product structure.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Thought Machine and Tuum actually diverge.
| Attribute | Thought Machine | Tuum |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, API, Cloud | Web, API |
| Category | Technology | APIs |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Thought Machine
- Smart contract product engine
- Cloud native architecture
- Real time ledger
- Vault Payments
- API first design
- Multi entity and multi currency
- Product versioning and testing
- Configurable posting rules
Only in Tuum
- Modular product structure
- Low-code integration middleware
- Cloud-agnostic deployment
- Multi-currency real-time accounts
- Cards and lending modules
- Faster migration timeline
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Thought Machine
- A large bank launching a separate digital brand on a clean core rather than migrating the back booknot Tuum
- A bank whose product launches are blocked by vendor change requests on a legacy corenot Tuum
- An institution needing real time balances and postings for instant payment obligationsnot Tuum
- A group consolidating multiple country cores onto one multi entity platformnot Tuum
Tuum
- A bank wanting to migrate specific banking products to the cloud within months rather than replacing its entire core at oncenot Thought Machine
- A fintech in the DACH region or Middle East wanting a European core banking vendor with regional expansion focusnot Thought Machine
- An institution wanting low-code middleware to connect new modules to an existing legacy core rather than a full rebuildnot Thought Machine
- A company researching "Modularbank" that needs to confirm it is the same company now branded Tuumnot Thought Machine
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Thought Machine
- A core replacement is a two to four year programme at an established bank, and the licence is a minority of total cost against system integrator fees, parallel running and data migration.
- The smart contract model presumes a bank can write and maintain Python financial products, and institutions without that engineering capability end up outsourcing the very flexibility they bought.
- Cloud infrastructure cost sits with the bank and is not trivial at scale, so total cost of ownership comparisons against a hosted legacy core often miss a large recurring line.
- Thought Machine has made two rounds of job cuts pursuing profitability, which is a legitimate supplier stability concern for a system a bank expects to run for fifteen years.
- The functional footprint is core ledger and product engine, so origination, collections, regulatory reporting and channels all come from other vendors, and the integration estate around Vault is the bank's problem to design and own.
Tuum
- It is a smaller, younger company than Mambu, so it has fewer live reference deployments and a shorter track record to evaluate risk against.
- The 2022-era rebrand from Modularbank to Tuum means older funding records, case studies and press coverage appear under a different name, complicating due diligence for anyone unaware of the change.
- Pricing is entirely unpublished, requiring a sales conversation to budget against competing composable core vendors.
- Its geographic expansion into DACH and the Middle East is comparatively recent, so support depth and local regulatory expertise in those markets are less proven than in its home Baltic and Nordic base.
- As with any core banking platform, choosing Tuum is a multi-year infrastructure commitment; switching cores after implementation is a major undertaking regardless of how modular the initial adoption was.
Pricing, plan by plan
Thought Machine
On request- Vault Core$undefined/year
- Quoted per institution, typically on account volumes or annual contract value
- Implementation and system integrator costs commonly exceed the licence fee
- Cloud infrastructure costs are the bank's and are not included
Tuum
On request- Tuum$undefined/year
- Subscription and module-based pricing, not published
- Custom quote required via sales
Which should you pick?
Choose Thought Machine if
- You need smart contract product engine.
- You work on Web, API, Cloud.
- You also want cloud native architecture.
Choose Tuum if
- You need modular product structure.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want low-code integration middleware.
Questions people ask
- Is Thought Machine or Tuum better?
- Neither clearly leads. Thought Machine starts at On request and Tuum at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Thought Machine or Tuum?
- Thought Machine starts at On request and Tuum at On request.
- Does Thought Machine or Tuum run on more platforms?
- Thought Machine runs on Web, API, Cloud. Tuum runs on Web, API.
- What is Thought Machine best used for?
- Thought Machine is most often used for a large bank launching a separate digital brand on a clean core rather than migrating the back book, a bank whose product launches are blocked by vendor change requests on a legacy core, an institution needing real time balances and postings for instant payment obligations, a group consolidating multiple country cores onto one multi entity platform. Of those, a large bank launching a separate digital brand on a clean core rather than migrating the back book and a bank whose product launches are blocked by vendor change requests on a legacy core are not what Tuum is typically brought in for.
- What can Thought Machine do that Tuum cannot?
- Thought Machine covers Smart contract product engine, Cloud native architecture, Real time ledger, Vault Payments. Tuum covers Modular product structure, Low-code integration middleware, Cloud-agnostic deployment, Multi-currency real-time accounts.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Thought Machine: Is Vault Core genuinely cloud native?
Yes. It is containerised, runs on Kubernetes on public cloud, and posts in real time rather than in overnight batch.
Tuum: Is Tuum the same company as Modularbank?
Yes, Modularbank rebranded to Tuum; it is the same company and platform.
Thought Machine: How long does a migration take?
Eighteen months at the absolute fastest for a narrow greenfield launch; two to four years for a phased migration at an established bank.
Tuum: Where is it strongest geographically?
Its base is Estonia and the Nordic and Baltic region, with newer expansion into DACH and the Middle East.
Thought Machine: Does the licence fee represent the total cost?
No. Implementation, system integration, parallel running and cloud infrastructure typically cost more than the licence over the programme.
Tuum: Is pricing published?
No, subscription and module pricing require a sales conversation.
Related pages
More on Thought Machine
Other head to heads
- Thought Machine vs Finxact
- Thought Machine vs Zeta
- Thought Machine vs Alkami
- Thought Machine vs Personetics
- Thought Machine vs Istio
- Thought Machine vs Terraform
- Thought Machine vs Trino
- Thought Machine vs Apache Hadoop
- Thought Machine vs Apache Spark
- Thought Machine vs Mozilla Firefox
- Thought Machine vs Microsoft Outlook
- Thought Machine vs GitHub
- Thought Machine vs Attio
- Thought Machine vs CloudAMQP
- Thought Machine vs Dropbox
- Thought Machine vs Eclipse
- Thought Machine vs Jenkins
- Thought Machine vs Miro
- Thought Machine vs Mambu
- Thought Machine vs Vodeno
- Thought Machine vs Fintech Farm
- Thought Machine vs Skaleet
- Thought Machine vs Weavr
- Thought Machine vs Temenos Transact
- Thought Machine vs 10x Banking
- Thought Machine vs Unit
- Thought Machine vs Griffin
- Thought Machine vs Swan
- Thought Machine vs i2c
- Thought Machine vs Solaris
- Thought Machine vs Tyk
- Thought Machine vs Volt
- Thought Machine vs WSO2 API Manager
- Thought Machine vs Zimpler
- Thought Machine vs 3scale
- Thought Machine vs Aiia
- Tuum vs Finxact
- Tuum vs Zeta
- Tuum vs Alkami
- Tuum vs Personetics
- Tuum vs Istio
- Tuum vs Terraform
- Tuum vs Trino
- Tuum vs Apache Hadoop
- Tuum vs Apache Spark
- Tuum vs Mozilla Firefox
- Tuum vs Microsoft Outlook
- Tuum vs GitHub
- Tuum vs Attio
- Tuum vs CloudAMQP
- Tuum vs Dropbox
- Tuum vs Eclipse
- Tuum vs Jenkins
- Tuum vs Miro
- Tuum vs Mambu
- Tuum vs Vodeno
- Tuum vs Fintech Farm
- Tuum vs Skaleet
- Tuum vs Weavr
- Tuum vs Temenos Transact
- Tuum vs 10x Banking
- Tuum vs Unit
- Tuum vs Griffin
- Tuum vs Swan
- Tuum vs i2c
- Tuum vs Solaris
- Tuum vs Tyk
- Tuum vs Volt
- Tuum vs WSO2 API Manager
- Tuum vs Zimpler
- Tuum vs 3scale
- Tuum vs Aiia
