Softwr

Technology · head to head

Thought Machine vs Tuum

Thought Machine logo

Thought Machine

Technology

Cloud native core banking where products are written as smart contracts

From
On request
Rated
-
Tuum logo

Tuum

APIs

Modular core banking platform from Estonia, formerly branded Modularbank

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Thought Machine a core replacement is a two to four year programme at an established bank, and the licence is a minority of total cost against system integrator fees, parallel running and data migration.; Tuum it is a smaller, younger company than Mambu, so it has fewer live reference deployments and a shorter track record to evaluate risk against.
  • They diverge on capability: Thought Machine covers Smart contract product engine, Tuum covers Modular product structure.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Thought Machine and Tuum actually diverge.

Attributes where Thought Machine and Tuum differ
AttributeThought MachineTuum
PlatformsWeb, API, CloudWeb, API
CategoryTechnologyAPIs

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Thought Machine

  • Smart contract product engine
  • Cloud native architecture
  • Real time ledger
  • Vault Payments
  • API first design
  • Multi entity and multi currency
  • Product versioning and testing
  • Configurable posting rules

Only in Tuum

  • Modular product structure
  • Low-code integration middleware
  • Cloud-agnostic deployment
  • Multi-currency real-time accounts
  • Cards and lending modules
  • Faster migration timeline

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Thought Machine

  • A large bank launching a separate digital brand on a clean core rather than migrating the back booknot Tuum
  • A bank whose product launches are blocked by vendor change requests on a legacy corenot Tuum
  • An institution needing real time balances and postings for instant payment obligationsnot Tuum
  • A group consolidating multiple country cores onto one multi entity platformnot Tuum

Tuum

  • A bank wanting to migrate specific banking products to the cloud within months rather than replacing its entire core at oncenot Thought Machine
  • A fintech in the DACH region or Middle East wanting a European core banking vendor with regional expansion focusnot Thought Machine
  • An institution wanting low-code middleware to connect new modules to an existing legacy core rather than a full rebuildnot Thought Machine
  • A company researching "Modularbank" that needs to confirm it is the same company now branded Tuumnot Thought Machine

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Thought Machine

  • A core replacement is a two to four year programme at an established bank, and the licence is a minority of total cost against system integrator fees, parallel running and data migration.
  • The smart contract model presumes a bank can write and maintain Python financial products, and institutions without that engineering capability end up outsourcing the very flexibility they bought.
  • Cloud infrastructure cost sits with the bank and is not trivial at scale, so total cost of ownership comparisons against a hosted legacy core often miss a large recurring line.
  • Thought Machine has made two rounds of job cuts pursuing profitability, which is a legitimate supplier stability concern for a system a bank expects to run for fifteen years.
  • The functional footprint is core ledger and product engine, so origination, collections, regulatory reporting and channels all come from other vendors, and the integration estate around Vault is the bank's problem to design and own.

Tuum

  • It is a smaller, younger company than Mambu, so it has fewer live reference deployments and a shorter track record to evaluate risk against.
  • The 2022-era rebrand from Modularbank to Tuum means older funding records, case studies and press coverage appear under a different name, complicating due diligence for anyone unaware of the change.
  • Pricing is entirely unpublished, requiring a sales conversation to budget against competing composable core vendors.
  • Its geographic expansion into DACH and the Middle East is comparatively recent, so support depth and local regulatory expertise in those markets are less proven than in its home Baltic and Nordic base.
  • As with any core banking platform, choosing Tuum is a multi-year infrastructure commitment; switching cores after implementation is a major undertaking regardless of how modular the initial adoption was.

Pricing, plan by plan

Thought Machine

On request
  • Vault Core$undefined/year
    • Quoted per institution, typically on account volumes or annual contract value
    • Implementation and system integrator costs commonly exceed the licence fee
    • Cloud infrastructure costs are the bank's and are not included

Tuum

On request
  • Tuum$undefined/year
    • Subscription and module-based pricing, not published
    • Custom quote required via sales

Which should you pick?

Choose Thought Machine if

  • You need smart contract product engine.
  • You work on Web, API, Cloud.
  • You also want cloud native architecture.

Choose Tuum if

  • You need modular product structure.
  • You work on Web, API.
  • You also want low-code integration middleware.

Questions people ask

Is Thought Machine or Tuum better?
Neither clearly leads. Thought Machine starts at On request and Tuum at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Thought Machine or Tuum?
Thought Machine starts at On request and Tuum at On request.
Does Thought Machine or Tuum run on more platforms?
Thought Machine runs on Web, API, Cloud. Tuum runs on Web, API.
What is Thought Machine best used for?
Thought Machine is most often used for a large bank launching a separate digital brand on a clean core rather than migrating the back book, a bank whose product launches are blocked by vendor change requests on a legacy core, an institution needing real time balances and postings for instant payment obligations, a group consolidating multiple country cores onto one multi entity platform. Of those, a large bank launching a separate digital brand on a clean core rather than migrating the back book and a bank whose product launches are blocked by vendor change requests on a legacy core are not what Tuum is typically brought in for.
What can Thought Machine do that Tuum cannot?
Thought Machine covers Smart contract product engine, Cloud native architecture, Real time ledger, Vault Payments. Tuum covers Modular product structure, Low-code integration middleware, Cloud-agnostic deployment, Multi-currency real-time accounts.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Thought Machine: Is Vault Core genuinely cloud native?

Yes. It is containerised, runs on Kubernetes on public cloud, and posts in real time rather than in overnight batch.

Tuum: Is Tuum the same company as Modularbank?

Yes, Modularbank rebranded to Tuum; it is the same company and platform.

Thought Machine: How long does a migration take?

Eighteen months at the absolute fastest for a narrow greenfield launch; two to four years for a phased migration at an established bank.

Tuum: Where is it strongest geographically?

Its base is Estonia and the Nordic and Baltic region, with newer expansion into DACH and the Middle East.

Thought Machine: Does the licence fee represent the total cost?

No. Implementation, system integration, parallel running and cloud infrastructure typically cost more than the licence over the programme.

Tuum: Is pricing published?

No, subscription and module pricing require a sales conversation.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads