Healthcare · head to head
Flo vs Therapixel

Flo
Healthcare
Period and cycle tracking app that settled with the US FTC in 2021 over sharing health data with third parties despite promising not to
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
Therapixel
Healthcare
French mammography AI with FDA clearances for 2D and tomosynthesis breast screening
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Flo has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Flo flo Health settled with the US FTC in 2021 over allegations it shared sensitive health data, including pregnancy and menstruation details, with Facebook, Google and other third parties despite telling users the data would stay private, a fact directly relevant to how much a user should trust current privacy claims without independently checking the published policy.; Therapixel european and American regulatory positions were established under different regimes, and under the EU Medical Device Regulation this class of diagnostic AI faces a higher classification and notified body scrutiny, so European buyers must verify the current MDR certificate and expiry rather than relying on a legacy CE reference.
- They diverge on capability: Flo covers Cycle and ovulation tracking, Therapixel covers MammoScreen 2D.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Flo and Therapixel actually diverge.
| Attribute | Flo | Therapixel |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Free with a Premium subscription | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | iOS, Android, Web | Web |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Flo
- Cycle and ovulation tracking
- Pregnancy mode
- Anonymous Mode
- Symptom and mood logging
- Expert content library
- Community and forums
Only in Therapixel
- MammoScreen 2D
- MammoScreen DBT
- One to ten suspicion score
- Summary report
- Workstation and PACS delivery
- Reading workflow configurations
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Flo
- Someone tracking cycle and ovulation who wants to weigh app convenience against the sensitivity of the data being loggednot Therapixel
- A user in a jurisdiction with legal risk around reproductive health data who wants to check Anonymous Mode and current data sharing policy before logging pregnancy or fertility attemptsnot Therapixel
- A buyer wanting to compare Flo directly against Clue on published data practices before choosing which app to trust with this informationnot Therapixel
- Someone who wants pregnancy tracking content alongside cycle tracking in one app rather than switching apps mid-pregnancynot Therapixel
Therapixel
- A European breast screening programme running mandatory double reading that wants to evaluate AI as a concurrent or second reader within what national guidance permitsnot Flo
- An American breast centre that has moved to tomosynthesis and needs reading support on DBT specifically, which Therapixel holds a clearance fornot Flo
- A screening service wanting a graded suspicion score rather than a binary flag so readers can calibrate their own thresholdnot Flo
- A radiology group evaluating multiple mammography AI vendors head to head on their own historic case set before committingnot Flo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Flo
- Flo Health settled with the US FTC in 2021 over allegations it shared sensitive health data, including pregnancy and menstruation details, with Facebook, Google and other third parties despite telling users the data would stay private, a fact directly relevant to how much a user should trust current privacy claims without independently checking the published policy.
- Reproductive health data, including logged periods, fertility attempts and pregnancy status, has been the subject of law enforcement data requests in some jurisdictions following changes to reproductive rights law, and cloud-stored logs are a real category of exposure regardless of a vendors intentions.
- Anonymous Mode, the privacy feature introduced after the settlement, is a setting that must be checked and understood rather than assumed, and its exact scope and default status should be verified in the current privacy policy rather than taken from marketing copy.
- Free tier predictions rely on self-reported symptom data and general population models, so accuracy for irregular cycles or specific medical conditions is limited compared with clinical tracking.
- The subscription auto-renews and, like most mobile subscriptions, must be cancelled through app store account settings rather than inside the app itself.
Therapixel
- European and American regulatory positions were established under different regimes, and under the EU Medical Device Regulation this class of diagnostic AI faces a higher classification and notified body scrutiny, so European buyers must verify the current MDR certificate and expiry rather than relying on a legacy CE reference.
- MammoScreen does mammography only, so a hospital wanting AI across head CT, chest and breast needs several vendors and several PACS integrations, or an orchestration layer bought from someone else.
- Therapixel is a small French company competing against Hologic and iCAD, which have incumbency inside the mammography reading workstation, so integration into an American breast centre is more work than it is for the workstation vendor own AI.
- Detection performance is sensitive to the mammography unit vendor and acquisition protocol, so published results do not transfer between estates and each site needs local validation it must fund itself.
- Whether AI can substitute for one of two human readers is a national workforce and liability question, not a product capability, so the labour saving that justifies the purchase in one country is not permitted in another.
Pricing, plan by plan
Flo
Free- Flo Premium$11.99/month
- Free tier covers core cycle tracking, predictions and symptom logging
- Premium adds deeper personalised insights and expert content, around $11.99 a month
- Annual and lifetime purchase options typically offered at a lower effective rate
Therapixel
On request- MammoScreen$undefined/year
- Priced per examination or by annual screening volume
- 2D and tomosynthesis licensed by the versions cleared for each
- Cloud or on premises deployment quoted differently
Which should you pick?
Choose Flo if
- You need cycle and ovulation tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want pregnancy mode.
Questions people ask
- Is Flo or Therapixel better?
- Neither clearly leads. Flo starts at Free and Therapixel at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Flo or Therapixel?
- Flo has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Flo and On request for Therapixel.
- Does Flo or Therapixel run on more platforms?
- Flo runs on iOS, Android, Web. Therapixel runs on Web.
- Can I use Flo for free?
- Yes. Flo has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Therapixel starts at On request.
- What is Flo best used for?
- Flo is most often used for someone tracking cycle and ovulation who wants to weigh app convenience against the sensitivity of the data being logged, a user in a jurisdiction with legal risk around reproductive health data who wants to check anonymous mode and current data sharing policy before logging pregnancy or fertility attempts, a buyer wanting to compare flo directly against clue on published data practices before choosing which app to trust with this information, someone who wants pregnancy tracking content alongside cycle tracking in one app rather than switching apps mid-pregnancy. Of those, someone tracking cycle and ovulation who wants to weigh app convenience against the sensitivity of the data being logged and a user in a jurisdiction with legal risk around reproductive health data who wants to check anonymous mode and current data sharing policy before logging pregnancy or fertility attempts are not what Therapixel is typically brought in for.
- What can Flo do that Therapixel cannot?
- Flo covers Cycle and ovulation tracking, Pregnancy mode, Anonymous Mode, Symptom and mood logging. Therapixel covers MammoScreen 2D, MammoScreen DBT, One to ten suspicion score, Summary report.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Flo: What happened with the FTC in 2021?
The US FTC alleged Flo Health shared sensitive health data, including pregnancy and menstruation details, with third parties like Facebook and Google despite promising to keep it private. Flo settled without admitting liability, agreeing to obtain consent for future sharing and to an independent privacy review.
Therapixel: Is MammoScreen FDA cleared?
Yes. It holds 510(k) clearance K192854 for two dimensional mammography from July 2020, a November 2021 clearance for digital breast tomosynthesis, and two further clearances in October 2024 for later versions.
Flo: What is Anonymous Mode?
A privacy setting Flo states disconnects entered health data from an identifiable profile. Check the current app and privacy policy for whether it is on by default or must be turned on manually, since this affects what data is linked to your identity.
Therapixel: Is it CE marked?
Yes, but European buyers should ask specifically for the current certificate under the Medical Device Regulation and its expiry date, because this class of diagnostic AI moved to a higher classification under MDR.
Flo: Is Flo free?
Core cycle tracking and predictions are free. Deeper personalised insights and expert content require Flo Premium.
Therapixel: What does the one to ten score mean?
It is a graded suspicion score per finding and per study, designed to be integrated alongside a radiologist BI-RADS assessment rather than treated as a positive or negative result.
Therapixel: Does it cover anything besides mammography?
No. It is a mammography product only, including tomosynthesis. Other body regions need a different vendor.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Flo vs Clue
- Flo vs Woebot Health
- Flo vs Rad AI
- Flo vs Healthie
- Flo vs Cerner
- Flo vs Sectra
- Flo vs Liberty Software
- Flo vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Flo vs OpenMRS
- Flo vs DHIS2
- Flo vs Beckman Coulter DxONE
- Flo vs Meditech
- Flo vs Healthgrades
- Flo vs Hinge Health
- Flo vs MDLive
- Flo vs Medscape
- Flo vs Lunit
- Flo vs Aidoc
- Flo vs Gleamer
- Flo vs Techcyte
- Flo vs Paige
- Flo vs PathAI
- Flo vs Rx30
- Flo vs Annalise.ai
- Flo vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Flo vs Quantum Health
- Flo vs Sysmex
- Flo vs Epocrates
- Flo vs Figure 1
- Flo vs Fullscript
- Flo vs GNU Health
- Flo vs GoodRx
- Flo vs Halaxy
- Therapixel vs Clue
- Therapixel vs Woebot Health
- Therapixel vs Rad AI
- Therapixel vs Healthie
- Therapixel vs Cerner
- Therapixel vs Sectra
- Therapixel vs Liberty Software
- Therapixel vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Therapixel vs OpenMRS
- Therapixel vs DHIS2
- Therapixel vs Beckman Coulter DxONE
- Therapixel vs Meditech
- Therapixel vs Healthgrades
- Therapixel vs Hinge Health
- Therapixel vs MDLive
- Therapixel vs Medscape
- Therapixel vs Lunit
- Therapixel vs Aidoc
- Therapixel vs Gleamer
- Therapixel vs Techcyte
- Therapixel vs Paige
- Therapixel vs PathAI
- Therapixel vs Rx30
- Therapixel vs Annalise.ai
- Therapixel vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Therapixel vs Quantum Health
- Therapixel vs Sysmex
- Therapixel vs Epocrates
- Therapixel vs Figure 1
- Therapixel vs Fullscript
- Therapixel vs GNU Health
- Therapixel vs GoodRx
- Therapixel vs Halaxy
