Cybersecurity · head to head
iDenfy vs Sumsub

iDenfy
Cybersecurity
Identity verification and AML screening bundled into a single per-verification price
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Sumsub
Cybersecurity
Identity verification and AML screening priced per verification
- From
- $1.35/verification
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: iDenfy rates are quoted rather than published on an accessible page, so despite the marketing emphasis on transparency you still need a sales conversation to get a number.; Sumsub the published per-verification rate is undercut by a monthly minimum of 149 or 299 dollars, so low volume businesses pay a much higher effective rate than the headline suggests.
- They diverge on capability: iDenfy covers Human review on all cases, Sumsub covers KYB verification.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which iDenfy and Sumsub actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (Per verification), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in iDenfy
- Human review on all cases
- Business verification
- Proof of address
- NFC chip reading
Only in Sumsub
- KYB verification
- No-code flow builder
- Transaction monitoring
- Travel Rule
- Fraud and duplicate detection
Both cover
- Document verification
- AML screening
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
iDenfy
- A European fintech that needs KYC and AML screening and wants one price rather than four line itemsnot Sumsub
- A gambling operator in a regulated EU market needing age and identity assurance with EU data processingnot Sumsub
- A crypto platform with modest volume that cannot meet the minimum commitments larger vendors requirenot Sumsub
- A marketplace wanting NFC passport chip reading for higher assurance without an enterprise contractnot Sumsub
Sumsub
- A crypto exchange needing KYC plus Travel Rule handling under one contractnot iDenfy
- A gambling operator entering several European markets and needing document coverage without a separate vendor per countrynot iDenfy
- A fintech that wants a published price it can model in a business case before speaking to a salespersonnot iDenfy
- A marketplace verifying both individual sellers and the companies behind them without buying two productsnot iDenfy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
iDenfy
- Rates are quoted rather than published on an accessible page, so despite the marketing emphasis on transparency you still need a sales conversation to get a number.
- It is a smaller vendor than the market leaders, which makes it a harder sell through enterprise vendor-risk review even when the product performs well.
- Human review on every case caps throughput in a way fully automated competitors are not constrained by, which shows up as latency during volume spikes.
- Coverage and accuracy are strongest on European documents; performance on some Asian, African and Latin American document types trails specialists in those regions.
- The bundled AML screening uses its chosen data sources, so institutions mandated to use a specific list provider such as Dow Jones cannot substitute it and end up paying twice.
Sumsub
- The published per-verification rate is undercut by a monthly minimum of 149 or 299 dollars, so low volume businesses pay a much higher effective rate than the headline suggests.
- You are billed per verification attempt in most configurations, meaning applicant drop-off and resubmissions cost money without producing a customer.
- Pass rates and document support vary noticeably by country, and a market that works well in Europe can produce materially worse rejection rates in parts of Africa and South East Asia.
- The AML screening tier bundles list coverage that large institutions would normally buy separately and tune, giving less control over match thresholds than a dedicated screening vendor.
- The company originated in Russia before restructuring to a UK entity, and some financial institutions still raise that history in vendor risk review, which can slow or block procurement at conservative banks.
Pricing, plan by plan
iDenfy
On request- iDenfy Verification$undefined/verification
- Volume-tiered per-verification rates quoted on request
- AML screening bundled rather than charged per check
- No monthly minimum advertised
Sumsub
$1.35/verification- Basic$1.35/verification
- 149 USD minimum monthly spend
- Document verification and liveness
- No-code flow builder
- Compliance$1.85/verification
- 299 USD minimum monthly spend
- Everything in Basic
- AML sanctions and PEP screening
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Negotiated volume rate
- Custom jurisdictions and languages
- Dedicated support
Which should you pick?
Choose iDenfy if
- You need human review on all cases.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want business verification.
Choose Sumsub if
- You need kyb verification.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want no-code flow builder.
Questions people ask
- Is iDenfy or Sumsub better?
- Neither clearly leads. iDenfy starts at On request and Sumsub at $1.35/verification, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, iDenfy or Sumsub?
- iDenfy starts at On request and Sumsub at $1.35/verification.
- Does iDenfy or Sumsub run on more platforms?
- iDenfy runs on Web, iOS, Android, API. Sumsub runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is iDenfy best used for?
- iDenfy is most often used for a european fintech that needs kyc and aml screening and wants one price rather than four line items, a gambling operator in a regulated eu market needing age and identity assurance with eu data processing, a crypto platform with modest volume that cannot meet the minimum commitments larger vendors require, a marketplace wanting nfc passport chip reading for higher assurance without an enterprise contract. Of those, a european fintech that needs kyc and aml screening and wants one price rather than four line items and a gambling operator in a regulated eu market needing age and identity assurance with eu data processing are not what Sumsub is typically brought in for.
- What can iDenfy do that Sumsub cannot?
- iDenfy covers Human review on all cases, Business verification, Proof of address, NFC chip reading. Sumsub covers KYB verification, No-code flow builder, Transaction monitoring, Travel Rule. Both handle Document verification, AML screening.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
iDenfy: Is AML screening included in the verification price?
That is the pitch, screening bundled rather than sold as a per-check add-on. Confirm which sanctions and PEP data sources are behind it before you rely on it.
Sumsub: What does a verification actually cost?
1.35 USD on Basic and 1.85 USD on Compliance, but with 149 and 299 USD monthly minimums respectively. Below roughly 110 or 160 checks a month you are paying the minimum, not the rate.
iDenfy: Is there a monthly minimum?
iDenfy markets itself as having no monthly minimum, in contrast to competitors charging $49 to $299 a month. Get that in writing in the contract.
Sumsub: Do failed verifications get charged?
Attempts are generally billable, so a poor onboarding funnel raises your bill. Confirm the exact resubmission policy in your contract.
iDenfy: Where is data processed?
iDenfy is established in Lithuania and processes in the EU, which simplifies GDPR transfer assessments compared with United States-headquartered vendors.
Sumsub: Does it cover business verification?
Yes, KYB with company registry lookups and beneficial owner resolution is part of the platform rather than a separate product.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- iDenfy vs Veriff
- iDenfy vs IDnow
- iDenfy vs Yoti
- iDenfy vs Jumio
- iDenfy vs Shufti Pro
- iDenfy vs Trulioo
- iDenfy vs Socure
- iDenfy vs Fenergo
- iDenfy vs Quantexa
- iDenfy vs NICE Actimize
- iDenfy vs Sardine
- iDenfy vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- iDenfy vs VMware Carbon Black
- iDenfy vs Wireshark
- iDenfy vs WorkOS
- iDenfy vs Zscaler Internet Access
- iDenfy vs Milestone XProtect
- iDenfy vs Signicat
- iDenfy vs Microsoft Sentinel
- iDenfy vs Mimecast
- iDenfy vs Motorola Vigilant
- iDenfy vs Nessus
- iDenfy vs NordPass
- iDenfy vs One Identity
- Sumsub vs Veriff
- Sumsub vs IDnow
- Sumsub vs Yoti
- Sumsub vs Jumio
- Sumsub vs Shufti Pro
- Sumsub vs Trulioo
- Sumsub vs Socure
- Sumsub vs Fenergo
- Sumsub vs Quantexa
- Sumsub vs NICE Actimize
- Sumsub vs Sardine
- Sumsub vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Sumsub vs VMware Carbon Black
- Sumsub vs Wireshark
- Sumsub vs WorkOS
- Sumsub vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Sumsub vs Milestone XProtect
- Sumsub vs Signicat
- Sumsub vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Sumsub vs Mimecast
- Sumsub vs Motorola Vigilant
- Sumsub vs Nessus
- Sumsub vs NordPass
- Sumsub vs One Identity
