Software · head to head
Strikedeck vs Akita
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Strikedeck product is discontinued and no longer supported or developed; Akita starts at $49 a month with no free tier, only a 14 day trial
- They diverge on capability: Strikedeck covers AI churn prediction, Akita covers Customer segments.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Strikedeck and Akita actually diverge.
| Attribute | Strikedeck | Akita |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $160/month |
| Pricing model | Unknown | subscription |
| Founded | 2015 | 2018 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Strikedeck
- AI churn prediction
- Automated playbooks
- Sentiment analysis
- Usage analytics
- Medallia
- Slack
- Zendesk
Only in Akita
- Customer segments
- Lifecycle stages
- Alerts
- Custom metrics
- HubSpot
- Intercom
- Stripe
Both cover
- Health scores
- Salesforce
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Strikedeck
- Customer Successnot Akita
- Ai Powerednot Akita
- Predictive Analyticsnot Akita
Akita
- Centralising customer data and product activity for a customer success teamnot Strikedeck
- Building health scores to flag at-risk accountsnot Strikedeck
- Segmenting customers and triggering automated playbooksnot Strikedeck
- Identifying expansion revenue opportunitiesnot Strikedeck
- Task and workflow management for CSMsnot Strikedeck
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Strikedeck
- Product is discontinued and no longer supported or developed
- Limited integration options compared to modern customer success platforms
- No longer receiving feature updates or security patches
Akita
- Starts at $49 a month with no free tier, only a 14 day trial
- Tier breakdown above the entry price is not published
Pricing, plan by plan
Strikedeck
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Strikedeck review.
Akita
$160/month- Starter$160/month
- Health scores
- Basic integrations
- Alerts
- Professional$400/month
- Unlimited integrations
- Custom metrics
- API
Which should you pick?
Choose Strikedeck if
- You need ai churn prediction.
- You also want automated playbooks.
Questions people ask
- Is Strikedeck or Akita better?
- Neither clearly leads. Strikedeck starts at On request and Akita at $160/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Strikedeck or Akita?
- Strikedeck starts at On request and Akita at $160/month.
- Does Strikedeck or Akita run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Strikedeck best used for?
- Strikedeck is most often used for customer success, ai powered, predictive analytics. Of those, customer success and ai powered are not what Akita is typically brought in for.
- What can Strikedeck do that Akita cannot?
- Strikedeck covers AI churn prediction, Automated playbooks, Sentiment analysis, Usage analytics. Akita covers Customer segments, Lifecycle stages, Alerts, Custom metrics. Both handle Health scores, Salesforce, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Strikedeck: What is Strikedeck?
Strikedeck was a customer success platform that used machine learning and predictive analytics to identify customer health risks, sentiment, and engagement opportunities. The platform was acquired by Medallia in May 2019 and has since been discontinued.
SourceStrikedeck: What happened to Strikedeck?
Medallia acquired Strikedeck on May 16, 2019, for $11 million. The platform was subsequently discontinued as Medallia consolidated its customer experience offerings.
SourceStrikedeck: What were Strikedeck's key features?
Strikedeck offered workflow automation, machine learning for customer health scoring, predictive analytics, usage tracking, and instant surveys. It provided real-time customer health dashboards and personalization capabilities.
SourceRelated pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Strikedeck vs Aviso
- Strikedeck vs ChurnZero
- Strikedeck vs Planhat
- Strikedeck vs Catalyst
- Strikedeck vs Custify
- Strikedeck vs CustomerSuccessBox
- Strikedeck vs SmartKarrot
- Strikedeck vs Vitally
- Strikedeck vs Amity
- Strikedeck vs Apttus
- Strikedeck vs Better Proposals
- Strikedeck vs Chorus.ai
- Strikedeck vs ClientPoint
- Strikedeck vs ClientSuccess
- Strikedeck vs Conga
- Strikedeck vs Kapta
- Strikedeck vs Lessonly
- Strikedeck vs Natero
- Akita vs Aviso
- Akita vs ChurnZero
- Akita vs Planhat
- Akita vs Catalyst
- Akita vs Custify
- Akita vs CustomerSuccessBox
- Akita vs SmartKarrot
- Akita vs Vitally
- Akita vs Amity
- Akita vs Apttus
- Akita vs Better Proposals
- Akita vs Chorus.ai
- Akita vs ClientPoint
- Akita vs ClientSuccess
- Akita vs Conga
- Akita vs Kapta
- Akita vs Lessonly
- Akita vs Natero

