Cloud · head to head
SST vs Zabbix

Zabbix
Networking
Open source infrastructure and network monitoring with distributed proxies and templating
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: SST primarily optimized for AWS with Cloudflare support; Zabbix the database is the scaling limit, and high frequency polling grows history tables fast enough that untuned installations hit housekeeping stalls and query timeouts within months.
- They diverge on capability: SST covers Single config file, Zabbix covers Agent and agentless collection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which SST and Zabbix actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in SST
- Single config file
- Resource linking
- Local development
- Multi-cloud support
- Multiple deployment stages
- VPC tunneling
Only in Zabbix
- Agent and agentless collection
- Templates
- Low-level discovery
- Distributed proxies
- Trigger expressions
- Escalation actions
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
SST
- Deploying Next.js frontends with serverless backendsnot Zabbix
- Managing databases and storage alongside application codenot Zabbix
- Creating staging environments for feature testingnot Zabbix
Zabbix
- A service provider monitoring thousands of customer devices where per-device commercial licensing is the largest line itemnot SST
- Branch or industrial sites with unreliable links that need local collection and bufferingnot SST
- Mixed estates where the same tool must poll SNMP switches, Linux hosts, Windows servers and Java applicationsnot SST
- Replacing an aging Nagios installation while keeping script-based checks that already existnot SST
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
SST
- Primarily optimized for AWS with Cloudflare support
- Learning curve for developers unfamiliar with infrastructure concepts
- Limited documentation for some advanced use cases
Zabbix
- The database is the scaling limit, and high frequency polling grows history tables fast enough that untuned installations hit housekeeping stalls and query timeouts within months.
- Initial configuration is heavy; getting useful alerting rather than noise requires understanding trigger expressions, macros and template inheritance, which is a multi-week learning curve for a team new to it.
- The AGPLv3 change at version 7.0 affects anyone offering Zabbix over a network as part of a commercial service, and that obligation is easy to inherit accidentally during an upgrade.
- The web interface is functional rather than pleasant, and many sites end up running Grafana alongside it purely for presentation, which is a second system to maintain.
- Upgrades between major versions touch the database schema and can take hours on large history tables, so the maintenance window is proportional to how much data you kept.
Pricing, plan by plan
SST
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the SST review.
Zabbix
Free- ZabbixFree
- No device, node or metric limits
- Full feature set with no paid edition of the software
- AGPLv3 from version 7.0 onward
- Zabbix Technical Support$undefined/year
- Tiered subscriptions with defined response times
- Access to Zabbix engineers for configuration and performance issues
- Bug fix priority and backports
Which should you pick?
Choose SST if
- You need single config file.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, Cloudflare, Node.js.
- You also want resource linking.
Choose Zabbix if
- You need agent and agentless collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want templates.
Questions people ask
- Is SST or Zabbix better?
- Neither clearly leads. SST starts at Free and Zabbix at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, SST or Zabbix?
- SST starts at Free and Zabbix at Free.
- Does SST or Zabbix run on more platforms?
- SST runs on AWS, Cloudflare, Node.js. Zabbix runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- Can I use SST for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is SST best used for?
- SST is most often used for deploying next.js frontends with serverless backends, managing databases and storage alongside application code, creating staging environments for feature testing. Of those, deploying next.js frontends with serverless backends and managing databases and storage alongside application code are not what Zabbix is typically brought in for.
- What can SST do that Zabbix cannot?
- SST covers Single config file, Resource linking, Local development, Multi-cloud support. Zabbix covers Agent and agentless collection, Templates, Low-level discovery, Distributed proxies.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
SST: Is SST free?
Yes, SST is open source and free. You only pay for cloud resources from AWS and other providers.
SourceZabbix: Is Zabbix genuinely free for commercial use?
The software has no licence fee at any scale. From version 7.0 it is AGPLv3, so offering it as a network service to third parties carries source distribution obligations.
SST: What cloud providers does SST support?
SST supports over 150 providers through built-in AWS and Cloudflare components, plus Pulumi and Terraform providers.
SourceZabbix: What is the real cost of running it?
Database administration and the person who tunes it. Budget for PostgreSQL with TimescaleDB and someone who owns the retention policy.
Zabbix: How does it compare to a commercial per-device tool?
It removes the licence line entirely and adds an operations line. Below a few hundred devices the commercial tool is often cheaper in total; above that Zabbix wins clearly.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- SST vs Pulumi
- SST vs Serverless Framework
- SST vs Heroku
- SST vs Packer
- SST vs Encore
- SST vs Render
- SST vs Porter
- SST vs Coolify
- SST vs CapRover
- SST vs Terragrunt
- SST vs Zeabur
- SST vs Railway
- SST vs Crossplane
- SST vs Dokku
- SST vs Fastly
- SST vs Flux
- SST vs Netdata
- SST vs OPNsense
- SST vs LibreNMS
- SST vs Icinga
- SST vs PRTG Network Monitor
- SST vs pfSense
- SST vs OpenVPN
- SST vs ThousandEyes
- SST vs Auvik
- SST vs Traefik
- SST vs Nebula
- SST vs Prometheus
- SST vs MikroTik RouterOS
- SST vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- SST vs Domotz
- SST vs Headscale
- SST vs HiveMQ
- Zabbix vs Pulumi
- Zabbix vs Serverless Framework
- Zabbix vs Heroku
- Zabbix vs Packer
- Zabbix vs Encore
- Zabbix vs Render
- Zabbix vs Porter
- Zabbix vs Coolify
- Zabbix vs CapRover
- Zabbix vs Terragrunt
- Zabbix vs Zeabur
- Zabbix vs Railway
- Zabbix vs Crossplane
- Zabbix vs Dokku
- Zabbix vs Fastly
- Zabbix vs Flux
- Zabbix vs Netdata
- Zabbix vs OPNsense
- Zabbix vs LibreNMS
- Zabbix vs Icinga
- Zabbix vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Zabbix vs pfSense
- Zabbix vs OpenVPN
- Zabbix vs ThousandEyes
- Zabbix vs Auvik
- Zabbix vs Traefik
- Zabbix vs Nebula
- Zabbix vs Prometheus
- Zabbix vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Zabbix vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Zabbix vs Domotz
- Zabbix vs Headscale
- Zabbix vs HiveMQ

