Networking · head to head
OpenVPN vs SST

OpenVPN
Networking
Open source VPN protocol with a commercial Access Server product priced per simultaneous connection
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: OpenVPN open source OpenVPN, while free, requires real technical skill to configure, secure and maintain without the Access Server admin layer; SST primarily optimized for AWS with Cloudflare support
- They diverge on capability: OpenVPN covers Open source core, SST covers Single config file.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OpenVPN and SST actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OpenVPN
- Open source core
- Access Server admin UI
- Per-connection licensing
- Free tier
- Cross-platform clients
Only in SST
- Single config file
- Resource linking
- Local development
- Multi-cloud support
- Multiple deployment stages
- VPC tunneling
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OpenVPN
- A technical team wanting a fully free, self-configured VPN server using the open source protocol without any vendor relationshipnot SST
- A small business wanting a supported, easier-to-administer VPN server, willing to pay per concurrent connection rather than per employeenot SST
- An organisation with more staff than typical concurrent VPN usage, since Access Server bills only active simultaneous connections, not total accountsnot SST
- An IoT or large-scale deployment needing custom Enterprise pricing above 2,000 connectionsnot SST
SST
- Deploying Next.js frontends with serverless backendsnot OpenVPN
- Managing databases and storage alongside application codenot OpenVPN
- Creating staging environments for feature testingnot OpenVPN
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OpenVPN
- Open source OpenVPN, while free, requires real technical skill to configure, secure and maintain without the Access Server admin layer
- Per-connection billing on Access Server means usage spikes, such as an all-hands remote day, can push simultaneous connections over a licensed limit and block new connections until usage drops or the plan is upgraded
- OpenVPN's traditional hub-and-spoke architecture routes traffic through a central server, unlike mesh VPN tools like Tailscale or NetBird that establish direct peer-to-peer connections where possible, which can add latency
- Client configuration and certificate management for the open source version is more manual and error-prone than newer VPN tools with zero-config onboarding
- Access Server pricing above the Growth tier reverts to custom Enterprise quoting, so very large deployments lose the pricing transparency of the lower tiers
- The protocol's throughput is generally lower than newer kernel-integrated protocols like WireGuard under equivalent conditions, which matters for high-bandwidth use cases
SST
- Primarily optimized for AWS with Cloudflare support
- Learning curve for developers unfamiliar with infrastructure concepts
- Limited documentation for some advanced use cases
Pricing, plan by plan
OpenVPN
Free- Access Server FreeFree
- Up to 2 simultaneous connections
- All features included
- Access Server Growth$7/month
- Per simultaneous connection beyond the free tier
- Annual billing
- Access Server Enterprise/IoT$undefined/month
- Custom pricing for 2,000+ connections
SST
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the SST review.
Which should you pick?
Choose OpenVPN if
- You need open source core.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android.
- You also want access server admin ui.
Choose SST if
- You need single config file.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, Cloudflare, Node.js.
- You also want resource linking.
Questions people ask
- Is OpenVPN or SST better?
- Neither clearly leads. OpenVPN starts at Free and SST at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OpenVPN or SST?
- OpenVPN starts at Free and SST at Free.
- Does OpenVPN or SST run on more platforms?
- OpenVPN runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android. SST runs on AWS, Cloudflare, Node.js.
- Can I use OpenVPN for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is OpenVPN best used for?
- OpenVPN is most often used for a technical team wanting a fully free, self-configured vpn server using the open source protocol without any vendor relationship, a small business wanting a supported, easier-to-administer vpn server, willing to pay per concurrent connection rather than per employee, an organisation with more staff than typical concurrent vpn usage, since access server bills only active simultaneous connections, not total accounts, an iot or large-scale deployment needing custom enterprise pricing above 2,000 connections. Of those, a technical team wanting a fully free, self-configured vpn server using the open source protocol without any vendor relationship and a small business wanting a supported, easier-to-administer vpn server, willing to pay per concurrent connection rather than per employee are not what SST is typically brought in for.
- What can OpenVPN do that SST cannot?
- OpenVPN covers Open source core, Access Server admin UI, Per-connection licensing, Free tier. SST covers Single config file, Resource linking, Local development, Multi-cloud support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OpenVPN: Is OpenVPN free?
The open source protocol and software are free under the GPL; Access Server, the commercial packaged product, charges per simultaneous connection beyond a free 2-connection tier.
SST: Is SST free?
Yes, SST is open source and free. You only pay for cloud resources from AWS and other providers.
SourceOpenVPN: What counts as a connection for billing purposes?
A simultaneously active connected device, not a registered user account or total device count; unlimited accounts and devices can be created but only the licensed number can be connected at once.
SST: What cloud providers does SST support?
SST supports over 150 providers through built-in AWS and Cloudflare components, plus Pulumi and Terraform providers.
SourceOpenVPN: How does OpenVPN compare with WireGuard-based tools like Tailscale?
OpenVPN uses a traditional hub-and-spoke VPN architecture rather than the mesh, peer-to-peer approach used by newer tools like Tailscale or NetBird.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- OpenVPN vs pfSense
- OpenVPN vs ZeroTier
- OpenVPN vs MikroTik RouterOS
- OpenVPN vs Tailscale
- OpenVPN vs Icinga
- OpenVPN vs Zabbix
- OpenVPN vs Domotz
- OpenVPN vs LibreNMS
- OpenVPN vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- OpenVPN vs Twingate
- OpenVPN vs Consul
- OpenVPN vs OPNsense
- OpenVPN vs Nebula
- OpenVPN vs ngrok
- OpenVPN vs Palo Alto Networks
- OpenVPN vs Splunk
- OpenVPN vs Pulumi
- OpenVPN vs Serverless Framework
- OpenVPN vs Heroku
- OpenVPN vs Packer
- OpenVPN vs Encore
- OpenVPN vs Render
- OpenVPN vs Porter
- OpenVPN vs Coolify
- OpenVPN vs CapRover
- OpenVPN vs Terragrunt
- OpenVPN vs Zeabur
- OpenVPN vs Railway
- OpenVPN vs Crossplane
- OpenVPN vs Dokku
- OpenVPN vs Fastly
- OpenVPN vs Flux
- SST vs pfSense
- SST vs ZeroTier
- SST vs MikroTik RouterOS
- SST vs Tailscale
- SST vs Icinga
- SST vs Zabbix
- SST vs Domotz
- SST vs LibreNMS
- SST vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- SST vs Twingate
- SST vs Consul
- SST vs OPNsense
- SST vs Nebula
- SST vs ngrok
- SST vs Palo Alto Networks
- SST vs Splunk
- SST vs Pulumi
- SST vs Serverless Framework
- SST vs Heroku
- SST vs Packer
- SST vs Encore
- SST vs Render
- SST vs Porter
- SST vs Coolify
- SST vs CapRover
- SST vs Terragrunt
- SST vs Zeabur
- SST vs Railway
- SST vs Crossplane
- SST vs Dokku
- SST vs Fastly
- SST vs Flux

