Cloud · head to head
SST vs Zeabur
The short version
- Each has a real cost: SST primarily optimized for AWS with Cloudflare support; Zeabur free plan limited to single server with 48-hour log retention
- They diverge on capability: SST covers Single config file, Zeabur covers AI Agent.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which SST and Zeabur actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in SST
- Single config file
- Resource linking
- Local development
- Multi-cloud support
- Multiple deployment stages
- VPC tunneling
Only in Zeabur
- AI Agent
- Managed Servers
- Domain and DNS Management
- Email Service
- AI Hub
- Deploy Templates
- Git Integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
SST
- Deploying Next.js frontends with serverless backendsnot Zeabur
- Managing databases and storage alongside application codenot Zeabur
- Creating staging environments for feature testingnot Zeabur
Zeabur
- Deploying full-stack web applications without DevOps expertisenot SST
- Building AI agent infrastructure with integrated API accessnot SST
- Managing multi-region deployments with automated scalingnot SST
- Running containerized services with built-in domain and emailnot SST
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
SST
- Primarily optimized for AWS with Cloudflare support
- Learning curve for developers unfamiliar with infrastructure concepts
- Limited documentation for some advanced use cases
Zeabur
- Free plan limited to single server with 48-hour log retention
- Small team size may limit support and feature velocity
- Building spec upgrades limited on lower tiers
- Enterprise support not clearly documented
Pricing, plan by plan
SST
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the SST review.
Zeabur
Free- FreeFree
- 1 manageable server
- 2C4G build specs
- 48-hour log retention
- Dev$5/month
- 3 manageable servers
- 7-day log retention
- 250 MB file uploads
- Pro$19/month
- 10 manageable servers
- 4C8G build specs
- 30-day log retention
- Team$79/month
- 3 included seats
- Unlimited manageable servers
- 90-day log retention
Which should you pick?
Choose SST if
- You need single config file.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, Cloudflare, Node.js.
- You also want resource linking.
Choose Zeabur if
- You need ai agent.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI.
- You also want managed servers.
Questions people ask
- Is SST or Zeabur better?
- Neither clearly leads. SST starts at Free and Zeabur at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, SST or Zeabur?
- SST starts at Free and Zeabur at Free.
- Does SST or Zeabur run on more platforms?
- SST runs on AWS, Cloudflare, Node.js. Zeabur runs on Web, CLI.
- Can I use SST for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is SST best used for?
- SST is most often used for deploying next.js frontends with serverless backends, managing databases and storage alongside application code, creating staging environments for feature testing. Of those, deploying next.js frontends with serverless backends and managing databases and storage alongside application code are not what Zeabur is typically brought in for.
- What can SST do that Zeabur cannot?
- SST covers Single config file, Resource linking, Local development, Multi-cloud support. Zeabur covers AI Agent, Managed Servers, Domain and DNS Management, Email Service.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
SST: Is SST free?
Yes, SST is open source and free. You only pay for cloud resources from AWS and other providers.
SourceZeabur: What is included in the free plan?
The free plan includes 1 manageable server, 2C4G build specifications, 48-hour log retention, 50 MB file upload limit, and community support.
SourceSST: What cloud providers does SST support?
SST supports over 150 providers through built-in AWS and Cloudflare components, plus Pulumi and Terraform providers.
SourceZeabur: How do additional seats work on the Team plan?
The Team plan includes 3 seats with additional seats available at $24 per seat per month.
SourceZeabur: Is there a free trial period?
The Dev and Pro plans include 14 days free before billing begins.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- SST vs Pulumi
- SST vs Serverless Framework
- SST vs Heroku
- SST vs Packer
- SST vs Encore
- SST vs Render
- SST vs Porter
- SST vs Coolify
- SST vs CapRover
- SST vs Terragrunt
- SST vs Railway
- SST vs Crossplane
- SST vs Dokku
- SST vs Fastly
- SST vs Flux
- SST vs Fly.io
- SST vs Vultr
- SST vs Hetzner Cloud
- SST vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- SST vs Linode
- SST vs Google Cloud Platform
- SST vs Microsoft Azure
- SST vs Wasabi
- SST vs Thanos
- SST vs Zipkin
- SST vs Anyscale
- SST vs Fireworks AI
- SST vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Zeabur vs Pulumi
- Zeabur vs Serverless Framework
- Zeabur vs Heroku
- Zeabur vs Packer
- Zeabur vs Encore
- Zeabur vs Render
- Zeabur vs Porter
- Zeabur vs Coolify
- Zeabur vs CapRover
- Zeabur vs Terragrunt
- Zeabur vs Railway
- Zeabur vs Crossplane
- Zeabur vs Dokku
- Zeabur vs Fastly
- Zeabur vs Flux
- Zeabur vs Fly.io
- Zeabur vs Vultr
- Zeabur vs Hetzner Cloud
- Zeabur vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Zeabur vs Linode
- Zeabur vs Google Cloud Platform
- Zeabur vs Microsoft Azure
- Zeabur vs Wasabi
- Zeabur vs Thanos
- Zeabur vs Zipkin
- Zeabur vs Anyscale
- Zeabur vs Fireworks AI
- Zeabur vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)


