APIs · head to head
Solaris vs Trustly

Solaris
APIs
German banking as a service with a full banking licence and a live regulatory problem
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Trustly
APIs
Pay-by-bank payments network, majority-owned by private equity firm Nordic Capital
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Solaris baFin appointed a special representative in 2022 and extended the mandate in July 2024, so a partner is joining a bank under active supervisory monitoring, with slower approvals and heavier compliance demands as a direct consequence.; Trustly it is majority-owned by Nordic Capital, a private equity firm, so its long-term roadmap is ultimately oriented toward an eventual sale or IPO rather than indefinite independent operation.
- They diverge on capability: Solaris covers German banking licence, Trustly covers Pay by bank checkout.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Solaris and Trustly actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Web, API), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Solaris
- German banking licence
- IBAN accounts
- Card issuing
- Lending as a service
- Digital assets and custody
- SEPA payments
- KYC and onboarding
- Deposit protection
Only in Trustly
- Pay by bank checkout
- Instant refunds
- Verified payouts
- Multi-market bank connectivity
- Merchant dashboard and reconciliation
- Fraud and risk tooling
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Solaris
- A retailer or platform launching a German current account or card product without applying for its own licencenot Trustly
- A fintech that needs deposit taking and lending, which an e-money licence cannot providenot Trustly
- A European business needing German IBANs because customers reject foreign IBANs for salary and direct debitnot Trustly
- A company requiring German statutory deposit protection on customer balances as a product claimnot Trustly
Trustly
- An e-commerce merchant wanting a lower-cost alternative or complement to card payment acceptancenot Solaris
- A gaming or gambling operator needing verified, instant payouts to players' bank accountsnot Solaris
- A merchant wanting instant refunds processed directly to a customer's bank account rather than card reversal delaysnot Solaris
- A business in a market with strong open banking adoption wanting pay-by-bank as a checkout optionnot Solaris
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Solaris
- BaFin appointed a special representative in 2022 and extended the mandate in July 2024, so a partner is joining a bank under active supervisory monitoring, with slower approvals and heavier compliance demands as a direct consequence.
- BaFin fined Solaris EUR 6.5 million in March 2024 for systematically late suspicious activity reports and EUR 500,000 for breaching large exposure limits between January 2022 and March 2024, which is a track record a partner inherits reputationally.
- Solaris has previously needed BaFin approval before onboarding new corporate clients, which can turn a commercial decision to launch into a regulatory timetable outside your control.
- The 2024 restructuring involved job cuts and the closure of parts of a business unit, so product lines a partner depends on may not have the engineering behind them that the sales process implies.
- SBI Holdings acquired majority control in 2025, so strategic direction now sits with a Japanese financial group whose priorities for the European business may differ from the roadmap you were sold.
Trustly
- It is majority-owned by Nordic Capital, a private equity firm, so its long-term roadmap is ultimately oriented toward an eventual sale or IPO rather than indefinite independent operation.
- Consumer familiarity with paying by bank transfer still lags card payments in most markets, so merchants typically see it used as a secondary option rather than a full card replacement.
- The 1.15 to 3.15% merchant fee range is not a single published rate, so a merchant cannot know its actual cost without a sales negotiation.
- As with all open banking-dependent payment methods, reliability depends on the consistency of the underlying banks' own APIs, which Trustly does not control.
- Its verified payout functionality is heavily used in gaming and gambling, a sector with additional regulatory scrutiny, which is worth factoring in when evaluating vendor risk exposure by association.
Pricing, plan by plan
Solaris
On request- Solaris banking as a service$undefined/year
- Quoted per partner, typically setup fee plus monthly platform fee
- Per account, per card and per transaction charges on top
- Interchange sharing arrangements negotiated per programme
Trustly
On request- Trustly$undefined/month
- Typical merchant cost of 1.15% to 3.15% depending on volume and market
- Exact rate negotiated per merchant, not published as a flat card
Which should you pick?
Choose Solaris if
- You need german banking licence.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want iban accounts.
Choose Trustly if
- You need pay by bank checkout.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want instant refunds.
Questions people ask
- Is Solaris or Trustly better?
- Neither clearly leads. Solaris starts at On request and Trustly at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Solaris or Trustly?
- Solaris starts at On request and Trustly at On request.
- Does Solaris or Trustly run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, API, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Solaris best used for?
- Solaris is most often used for a retailer or platform launching a german current account or card product without applying for its own licence, a fintech that needs deposit taking and lending, which an e-money licence cannot provide, a european business needing german ibans because customers reject foreign ibans for salary and direct debit, a company requiring german statutory deposit protection on customer balances as a product claim. Of those, a retailer or platform launching a german current account or card product without applying for its own licence and a fintech that needs deposit taking and lending, which an e-money licence cannot provide are not what Trustly is typically brought in for.
- What can Solaris do that Trustly cannot?
- Solaris covers German banking licence, IBAN accounts, Card issuing, Lending as a service. Trustly covers Pay by bank checkout, Instant refunds, Verified payouts, Multi-market bank connectivity.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Solaris: Does Solaris have a real banking licence?
Yes. Solaris SE is a German credit institution, which is why it can offer deposits and lending, unlike e-money based competitors.
Trustly: Who owns Trustly?
Nordic Capital, a private equity firm, holds a 51.1% majority stake; Alfven & Didrikson and BlackRock hold smaller stakes.
Solaris: Is the BaFin action still live?
The special representative appointed in 2022 had the mandate extended in July 2024, and fines were issued in March 2024. Treat supervisory oversight as an active condition in your diligence.
Trustly: Is Trustly going public?
It has discussed an IPO but as of its most recent comments said one remained at least a year away.
Solaris: Who owns Solaris now?
SBI Holdings of Japan agreed in December 2024 and January 2025 to take a majority stake of over seventy per cent for around EUR 100 million.
Trustly: What does it typically cost a merchant?
Roughly 1.15% to 3.15% of transaction value depending on volume and market, negotiated per merchant.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Solaris vs Unit
- Solaris vs Toqio
- Solaris vs Griffin
- Solaris vs Vodeno
- Solaris vs Weavr
- Solaris vs Swan
- Solaris vs Treasury Prime
- Solaris vs Fintech Farm
- Solaris vs Synctera
- Solaris vs Astra
- Solaris vs Codat
- Solaris vs Sila
- Solaris vs LiteLLM
- Solaris vs Method Financial
- Solaris vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- Solaris vs Neonomics
- Solaris vs Payload CMS
- Solaris vs Portkey
- Solaris vs Yapily
- Solaris vs Aiia
- Solaris vs Volt
- Solaris vs TrueLayer
- Solaris vs Token.io
- Solaris vs Tink
- Solaris vs Brite Payments
- Solaris vs Dwolla
- Solaris vs Zimpler
- Solaris vs Salt Edge
- Solaris vs Yodlee
- Solaris vs Stainless
- Solaris vs Strapi
- Solaris vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Solaris vs Thredd
- Solaris vs Thunder Client
- Trustly vs Unit
- Trustly vs Toqio
- Trustly vs Griffin
- Trustly vs Vodeno
- Trustly vs Weavr
- Trustly vs Swan
- Trustly vs Treasury Prime
- Trustly vs Fintech Farm
- Trustly vs Synctera
- Trustly vs Astra
- Trustly vs Codat
- Trustly vs Sila
- Trustly vs LiteLLM
- Trustly vs Method Financial
- Trustly vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- Trustly vs Neonomics
- Trustly vs Payload CMS
- Trustly vs Portkey
- Trustly vs Yapily
- Trustly vs Aiia
- Trustly vs Volt
- Trustly vs TrueLayer
- Trustly vs Token.io
- Trustly vs Tink
- Trustly vs Brite Payments
- Trustly vs Dwolla
- Trustly vs Zimpler
- Trustly vs Salt Edge
- Trustly vs Yodlee
- Trustly vs Stainless
- Trustly vs Strapi
- Trustly vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Trustly vs Thredd
- Trustly vs Thunder Client
