APIs · head to head
Fintech Farm vs Trustly

Fintech Farm
APIs
"Neobank in a box" for banks in emerging markets, paid on a performance basis
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Trustly
APIs
Pay-by-bank payments network, majority-owned by private equity firm Nordic Capital
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fintech Farm the performance-based model means a bank is entering an ongoing revenue-sharing relationship rather than buying a one-time or fixed-fee software licence, which changes long-term cost dynamics as the neobank grows.; Trustly it is majority-owned by Nordic Capital, a private equity firm, so its long-term roadmap is ultimately oriented toward an eventual sale or IPO rather than indefinite independent operation.
- They diverge on capability: Fintech Farm covers End-to-end neobank stack, Trustly covers Pay by bank checkout.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fintech Farm and Trustly actually diverge.
| Attribute | Fintech Farm | Trustly |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, API |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fintech Farm
- End-to-end neobank stack
- Credit scoring engines
- Debit, credit and BNPL products
- Investment features
- Performance-based partnership
- Emerging market focus
Only in Trustly
- Pay by bank checkout
- Instant refunds
- Verified payouts
- Multi-market bank connectivity
- Merchant dashboard and reconciliation
- Fraud and risk tooling
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fintech Farm
- A mid-sized regulated bank in an emerging market wanting to launch a neobank without building digital product expertise in housenot Trustly
- A bank wanting a partner compensated on growth outcomes rather than a fixed software licencenot Trustly
- An institution needing credit scoring built specifically for thin-file, underbanked emerging market customersnot Trustly
- A bank expanding into a new emerging market and wanting a proven neobank launch playbook rather than starting from scratchnot Trustly
Trustly
- An e-commerce merchant wanting a lower-cost alternative or complement to card payment acceptancenot Fintech Farm
- A gaming or gambling operator needing verified, instant payouts to players' bank accountsnot Fintech Farm
- A merchant wanting instant refunds processed directly to a customer's bank account rather than card reversal delaysnot Fintech Farm
- A business in a market with strong open banking adoption wanting pay-by-bank as a checkout optionnot Fintech Farm
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fintech Farm
- The performance-based model means a bank is entering an ongoing revenue-sharing relationship rather than buying a one-time or fixed-fee software licence, which changes long-term cost dynamics as the neobank grows.
- It requires the partner bank to already hold a banking licence and balance sheet, so it is not usable by a company wanting to launch banking services without any existing regulatory status.
- Focus on emerging markets means less proven track record in developed, heavily regulated markets such as the US or Western Europe.
- As a smaller, founder-led company relative to Mambu or Temenos, its longevity and ability to support partner banks over a decade-plus relationship carries more vendor-risk uncertainty.
- Being compensated on customer and revenue growth creates a natural incentive to prioritise growth-driving features over, for example, deep compliance tooling that does not directly move those metrics.
Trustly
- It is majority-owned by Nordic Capital, a private equity firm, so its long-term roadmap is ultimately oriented toward an eventual sale or IPO rather than indefinite independent operation.
- Consumer familiarity with paying by bank transfer still lags card payments in most markets, so merchants typically see it used as a secondary option rather than a full card replacement.
- The 1.15 to 3.15% merchant fee range is not a single published rate, so a merchant cannot know its actual cost without a sales negotiation.
- As with all open banking-dependent payment methods, reliability depends on the consistency of the underlying banks' own APIs, which Trustly does not control.
- Its verified payout functionality is heavily used in gaming and gambling, a sector with additional regulatory scrutiny, which is worth factoring in when evaluating vendor risk exposure by association.
Pricing, plan by plan
Fintech Farm
On request- Fintech Farm$undefined/year
- Performance-based compensation tied to customer numbers and revenue generated
- No published flat licence fee
Trustly
On request- Trustly$undefined/month
- Typical merchant cost of 1.15% to 3.15% depending on volume and market
- Exact rate negotiated per merchant, not published as a flat card
Which should you pick?
Choose Fintech Farm if
- You need end-to-end neobank stack.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want credit scoring engines.
Choose Trustly if
- You need pay by bank checkout.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want instant refunds.
Questions people ask
- Is Fintech Farm or Trustly better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fintech Farm starts at On request and Trustly at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fintech Farm or Trustly?
- Fintech Farm starts at On request and Trustly at On request.
- Does Fintech Farm or Trustly run on more platforms?
- Fintech Farm runs on Web, iOS, Android. Trustly runs on Web, API.
- What is Fintech Farm best used for?
- Fintech Farm is most often used for a mid-sized regulated bank in an emerging market wanting to launch a neobank without building digital product expertise in house, a bank wanting a partner compensated on growth outcomes rather than a fixed software licence, an institution needing credit scoring built specifically for thin-file, underbanked emerging market customers, a bank expanding into a new emerging market and wanting a proven neobank launch playbook rather than starting from scratch. Of those, a mid-sized regulated bank in an emerging market wanting to launch a neobank without building digital product expertise in house and a bank wanting a partner compensated on growth outcomes rather than a fixed software licence are not what Trustly is typically brought in for.
- What can Fintech Farm do that Trustly cannot?
- Fintech Farm covers End-to-end neobank stack, Credit scoring engines, Debit, credit and BNPL products, Investment features. Trustly covers Pay by bank checkout, Instant refunds, Verified payouts, Multi-market bank connectivity.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Fintech Farm: How is Fintech Farm paid?
On a performance basis, tied to the number of customers and revenue its neobank product generates for the partner bank, rather than a flat licence fee.
Trustly: Who owns Trustly?
Nordic Capital, a private equity firm, holds a 51.1% majority stake; Alfven & Didrikson and BlackRock hold smaller stakes.
Fintech Farm: Does the bank need its own licence?
Yes, Fintech Farm partners with banks that already hold a banking licence and balance sheet; it does not provide the licence itself.
Trustly: Is Trustly going public?
It has discussed an IPO but as of its most recent comments said one remained at least a year away.
Fintech Farm: Which markets does it focus on?
Emerging markets, including operations across regions such as Vietnam, Nigeria and increasingly India.
Trustly: What does it typically cost a merchant?
Roughly 1.15% to 3.15% of transaction value depending on volume and market, negotiated per merchant.
Related pages
More on Fintech Farm
Other head to heads
- Fintech Farm vs Mambu
- Fintech Farm vs Tuum
- Fintech Farm vs Swan
- Fintech Farm vs Vodeno
- Fintech Farm vs Treasury Prime
- Fintech Farm vs Griffin
- Fintech Farm vs Weavr
- Fintech Farm vs Solaris
- Fintech Farm vs Synctera
- Fintech Farm vs Unit
- Fintech Farm vs Paymentology
- Fintech Farm vs Toqio
- Fintech Farm vs Treblle
- Fintech Farm vs Tribe Payments
- Fintech Farm vs Yapily
- Fintech Farm vs Aiia
- Fintech Farm vs Volt
- Fintech Farm vs TrueLayer
- Fintech Farm vs Token.io
- Fintech Farm vs Tink
- Fintech Farm vs Brite Payments
- Fintech Farm vs Dwolla
- Fintech Farm vs Zimpler
- Fintech Farm vs Salt Edge
- Fintech Farm vs Yodlee
- Fintech Farm vs Stainless
- Fintech Farm vs Strapi
- Fintech Farm vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Fintech Farm vs Thredd
- Fintech Farm vs Thunder Client
- Trustly vs Mambu
- Trustly vs Tuum
- Trustly vs Swan
- Trustly vs Vodeno
- Trustly vs Treasury Prime
- Trustly vs Griffin
- Trustly vs Weavr
- Trustly vs Solaris
- Trustly vs Synctera
- Trustly vs Unit
- Trustly vs Paymentology
- Trustly vs Toqio
- Trustly vs Treblle
- Trustly vs Tribe Payments
- Trustly vs Yapily
- Trustly vs Aiia
- Trustly vs Volt
- Trustly vs TrueLayer
- Trustly vs Token.io
- Trustly vs Tink
- Trustly vs Brite Payments
- Trustly vs Dwolla
- Trustly vs Zimpler
- Trustly vs Salt Edge
- Trustly vs Yodlee
- Trustly vs Stainless
- Trustly vs Strapi
- Trustly vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Trustly vs Thredd
- Trustly vs Thunder Client
