Logistics · head to head
Manhattan Associates vs Softeon

Manhattan Associates
Logistics
Tier-one warehouse, order and transportation management, now cloud subscription only
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Softeon
Logistics
Warehouse management and execution for complex distribution networks
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Manhattan Associates manhattan Active is cloud subscription only with no perpetual licence and no on-premises deployment, so organisations with a capital purchasing model or air-gapped requirements are excluded outright.; Softeon lower brand recognition than Manhattan, Blue Yonder or SAP, which is a genuine obstacle in enterprise procurement regardless of capability
- They diverge on capability: Manhattan Associates covers Order management, Softeon covers Warehouse execution.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Manhattan Associates and Softeon actually diverge.
| Attribute | Manhattan Associates | Softeon |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, Cloud, iOS, Android | Web, On-premise, Cloud |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logistics).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Manhattan Associates
- Order management
- Transportation management
- Labour management
- Yard management
- Versionless updates
- Store and point of sale
Only in Softeon
- Warehouse execution
- Distributed order management
- Configuration over customisation
- Automation integration
- Regulated distribution
Both cover
- Warehouse management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Manhattan Associates
- A retailer fulfilling store, ecommerce and wholesale orders from one inventory pool without separate systems per channelnot Softeon
- A distribution centre introducing goods-to-person robotics that needs the WMS to orchestrate the automationnot Softeon
- A third-party logistics provider running multiple clients with different processes in one facilitynot Softeon
- An operation where labour is the largest cost and engineered standards would pay for the softwarenot Softeon
Softeon
- Distribution networks where a failed WMS go-live has physical consequencesnot Manhattan Associates
- Regulated food and pharmaceutical distribution needing lot and expiry controlnot Manhattan Associates
- Operations integrating warehouse automation with execution softwarenot Manhattan Associates
- Companies replacing a heavily customised legacy WMS they can no longer upgradenot Manhattan Associates
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Manhattan Associates
- Manhattan Active is cloud subscription only with no perpetual licence and no on-premises deployment, so organisations with a capital purchasing model or air-gapped requirements are excluded outright.
- Legacy WMOS and SCALE customers pay annual maintenance of roughly 18 to 22 per cent of licence value while the vendor steers investment towards Active, so staying put has a rising opportunity cost as well as a cash cost.
- Implementation is a tier-one project measured in quarters, and system integrator fees routinely match or exceed several years of subscription, which is the part that breaks budgets rather than the licence.
- Functional depth assumes complexity; operations with simple distribution end up configuring around capability they do not need and paying for it every year.
- Modules are priced individually, so warehouse, order, transportation and labour management each carry their own line, and a business case built on the WMS alone understates the eventual footprint.
Softeon
- Lower brand recognition than Manhattan, Blue Yonder or SAP, which is a genuine obstacle in enterprise procurement regardless of capability
- Pricing and implementation cost are entirely quote-based with no public reference points
- The buyer profile is narrow: it is aimed at complex distribution, and simpler operations will pay for depth they never use
- Smaller partner ecosystem than the market leaders, so implementation resources are more concentrated
- Public documentation is thin compared with vendors that publish extensively, making pre-sales research harder
Pricing, plan by plan
Manhattan Associates
On request- Manhattan Active Warehouse Management$undefined/year
- Cloud subscription only, no perpetual licence
- Versionless with continuous updates
- Priced per module and by volume or site
- Manhattan Active Omni and Transportation$undefined/year
- Order management, point of sale and store fulfilment
- Multimodal transportation management
- Each module priced separately
- Legacy WMOS and SCALE$undefined/year
- Perpetual licence held by existing customers
- Annual maintenance typically 18 to 22 per cent of licence value
- Still sold to existing customers with extended support
Softeon
On request- Softeon WMS$undefined/year
- Warehouse management
- Warehouse execution
- Distributed order management
Which should you pick?
Choose Manhattan Associates if
- You need order management.
- You work on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android.
- You also want transportation management.
Choose Softeon if
- You need warehouse execution.
- You work on Web, On-premise, Cloud.
- You also want distributed order management.
Questions people ask
- Is Manhattan Associates or Softeon better?
- Neither clearly leads. Manhattan Associates starts at On request and Softeon at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Manhattan Associates or Softeon?
- Manhattan Associates starts at On request and Softeon at On request.
- Does Manhattan Associates or Softeon run on more platforms?
- Manhattan Associates runs on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android. Softeon runs on Web, On-premise, Cloud.
- What is Manhattan Associates best used for?
- Manhattan Associates is most often used for a retailer fulfilling store, ecommerce and wholesale orders from one inventory pool without separate systems per channel, a distribution centre introducing goods-to-person robotics that needs the wms to orchestrate the automation, a third-party logistics provider running multiple clients with different processes in one facility, an operation where labour is the largest cost and engineered standards would pay for the software. Of those, a retailer fulfilling store, ecommerce and wholesale orders from one inventory pool without separate systems per channel and a distribution centre introducing goods-to-person robotics that needs the wms to orchestrate the automation are not what Softeon is typically brought in for.
- What can Manhattan Associates do that Softeon cannot?
- Manhattan Associates covers Order management, Transportation management, Labour management, Yard management. Softeon covers Warehouse execution, Distributed order management, Configuration over customisation, Automation integration. Both handle Warehouse management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Manhattan Associates: Can I buy Manhattan Active on-premises or perpetually?
No. Manhattan Active is cloud-native SaaS priced per module by subscription, with no perpetual licence option.
Softeon: What makes Softeon different from other WMS vendors?
Its claim is delivery reliability rather than feature superiority, backed by a published record of implementations going live on time. In a market where WMS overruns are normal, that is the pitch.
Manhattan Associates: What happens to my WMOS or SCALE licence?
Existing perpetual licences continue, with maintenance typically 18 to 22 per cent of licence value each year. Manhattan offers discounted transition pricing to move to Active.
Softeon: Configuration or customisation?
Configuration-driven by design. That is worth verifying in detail, because customised warehouse systems are the ones that become impossible to upgrade or replace later.
Manhattan Associates: What does versionless actually mean?
Updates are applied continuously while the subscription is active, so there is no separate upgrade project, but you also do not control when changes arrive.
Softeon: What does it cost?
Not published. Enterprise annual licensing plus implementation, quoted on scope.
Manhattan Associates: How much does implementation cost relative to the software?
Expect a system integrator engagement comparable to or larger than several years of subscription. Budget for it as the main line, not a footnote.
Softeon: Does it handle warehouse automation?
Yes, warehouse execution and automation integration are core rather than bolted on, which is the main reason it appears on shortlists with automation vendors.
Softeon: Is it right for a single small warehouse?
No. The capability is aimed at complex, high-volume distribution, and a single simple site will not repay the implementation.
Related pages
More on Manhattan Associates
Other head to heads
- Manhattan Associates vs Blue Yonder
- Manhattan Associates vs Deposco
- Manhattan Associates vs ShipHero
- Manhattan Associates vs Descartes Systems
- Manhattan Associates vs Logiwa
- Manhattan Associates vs CargoWise
- Manhattan Associates vs Shippabo
- Manhattan Associates vs Shipwell
- Manhattan Associates vs McLeod Software
- Manhattan Associates vs Turvo
- Manhattan Associates vs Onfleet
- Manhattan Associates vs Shippo
- Manhattan Associates vs ShipStation
- Manhattan Associates vs Alpega
- Manhattan Associates vs Descartes MacroPoint
- Manhattan Associates vs SpireStock
- Manhattan Associates vs ShipEngine
- Manhattan Associates vs ShipMonk
- Manhattan Associates vs Trimble TMW.Suite
- Softeon vs Blue Yonder
- Softeon vs Deposco
- Softeon vs ShipHero
- Softeon vs Descartes Systems
- Softeon vs Logiwa
- Softeon vs CargoWise
- Softeon vs Shippabo
- Softeon vs Shipwell
- Softeon vs McLeod Software
- Softeon vs Turvo
- Softeon vs Onfleet
- Softeon vs Shippo
- Softeon vs ShipStation
- Softeon vs Alpega
- Softeon vs Descartes MacroPoint
- Softeon vs SpireStock
- Softeon vs ShipEngine
- Softeon vs ShipMonk
- Softeon vs Trimble TMW.Suite
