Cybersecurity · head to head
Silent Eight vs Stigg

Silent Eight
Cybersecurity
AI adjudication of sanctions screening and AML alerts
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Stigg has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Silent Eight automated disposition has to clear model risk governance and a regulator, and the shadow running period before auto-close is permitted can consume most of the first year of the contract.; Stigg free tier limited to 10,000 entities and 5M events per month
- They diverge on capability: Silent Eight covers Alert adjudication, Stigg covers Real-time credit enforcement.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Silent Eight and Stigg actually diverge.
| Attribute | Silent Eight | Stigg |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Freemium with usage-based and custom tiers |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Linux | Web, Cloud, BYOC, BYODB, API |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Accounting |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Silent Eight
- Alert adjudication
- Narrative generation
- Name screening automation
- Quality assurance
- Shadow mode
- Model transparency reporting
Only in Stigg
- Real-time credit enforcement
- Financial-grade credits
- High-scale metering
- Budget governance
- Flexible deployment
- Billing platform integration
- Data warehouse integration
- CRM integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Silent Eight
- A bank whose level one screening team spends most of its time closing obvious false name matchesnot Stigg
- A payments institution with alert volumes growing faster than it can recruit and train analystsnot Stigg
- A compliance function asked by a regulator to demonstrate consistency of alert decisions across offshore teamsnot Stigg
- An institution that has just tightened screening thresholds after an enforcement action and cannot staff the resulting alert increasenot Stigg
Stigg
- Managing token and credit usage for AI productsnot Silent Eight
- Enforcing spending caps and budget controlsnot Silent Eight
- Implementing prepaid credit systems with expirynot Silent Eight
- Real-time entitlement verification for feature accessnot Silent Eight
- Scaling billing infrastructure for high-volume eventsnot Silent Eight
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Silent Eight
- Automated disposition has to clear model risk governance and a regulator, and the shadow running period before auto-close is permitted can consume most of the first year of the contract.
- It does not improve detection, so an institution with a poorly tuned monitoring system automates the handling of bad alerts rather than fixing why they exist.
- Pricing is tied to alert volume, which means efficiency gains elsewhere that reduce alerts also reduce the vendor bill in a way sales teams structure minimums against.
- The headcount saving is only realised if the institution actually reduces the analyst pool, and many banks redeploy rather than cut, leaving the business case unrealised on paper.
- As a mid-sized private vendor serving tier one banks, concentration risk cuts both ways; the loss of one large client materially affects the company, and buyers should ask about financial stability during diligence.
Stigg
- Free tier limited to 10,000 entities and 5M events per month
- Pro plan pricing ($399/month) may be high for early-stage companies
- Scale and BYOC plans require custom contracts and sales engagement
- Primarily targets AI and high-scale use cases, not all business models
- Requires integration with separate billing platform (Stripe, Zuora, etc.)
Pricing, plan by plan
Silent Eight
On request- Iris$undefined/year
- Priced by alert volume adjudicated
- Deploys against existing screening and monitoring systems
- Shadow mode evaluation period
Stigg
Free- Build (Free Forever)Free
- 10,000 managed entities per month
- 5M usage events per month
- 1K events per second rate limit
- Pro$399/month
- 10,000 entities included (graduated pricing to 100K)
- 25M usage events included (to 500M with graduated rates)
- 10K events per second (upgradeable to 100K)
- Scale$null/custom
- Custom entity and event volumes
- 50K events per second (upgradeable to 100K)
- RBAC and SSO (SAML)
- BYOC$40000/year
- Deploy in customer VPC
- Unlimited entities and events
- No event billing
Which should you pick?
Choose Silent Eight if
- You need alert adjudication.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want narrative generation.
Choose Stigg if
- You need real-time credit enforcement.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Cloud, BYOC, BYODB, API.
- You also want financial-grade credits.
Questions people ask
- Is Silent Eight or Stigg better?
- Neither clearly leads. Silent Eight starts at On request and Stigg at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Silent Eight or Stigg?
- Stigg has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Silent Eight and Free for Stigg.
- Does Silent Eight or Stigg run on more platforms?
- Silent Eight runs on Web, Linux. Stigg runs on Web, Cloud, BYOC, BYODB, API.
- Can I use Stigg for free?
- Yes. Stigg has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Silent Eight starts at On request.
- What is Silent Eight best used for?
- Silent Eight is most often used for a bank whose level one screening team spends most of its time closing obvious false name matches, a payments institution with alert volumes growing faster than it can recruit and train analysts, a compliance function asked by a regulator to demonstrate consistency of alert decisions across offshore teams, an institution that has just tightened screening thresholds after an enforcement action and cannot staff the resulting alert increase. Of those, a bank whose level one screening team spends most of its time closing obvious false name matches and a payments institution with alert volumes growing faster than it can recruit and train analysts are not what Stigg is typically brought in for.
- What can Silent Eight do that Stigg cannot?
- Silent Eight covers Alert adjudication, Narrative generation, Name screening automation, Quality assurance. Stigg covers Real-time credit enforcement, Financial-grade credits, High-scale metering, Budget governance.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Silent Eight: Does Silent Eight replace our screening system?
No. It consumes alerts from your existing screening and monitoring systems and decides them. The detection layer stays where it is.
Stigg: How quickly does Stigg check entitlements?
Stigg makes entitlement checks in under 10 milliseconds, enabling real-time enforcement of spending decisions before token consumption.
SourceSilent Eight: Will a regulator accept AI closing alerts?
It depends on your jurisdiction and your model governance evidence. Banks typically run extended shadow mode first and phase auto-closure by alert type.
Stigg: Can I use Stigg with my existing billing platform?
Yes, Stigg integrates with major billing platforms including Stripe, Zuora, Chargebee, Metronome, and Orb to manage entitlements and credits.
SourceSilent Eight: Where is the company based?
Singapore, with offices in New York, London and Warsaw.
Stigg: What deployment options does Stigg offer?
Stigg offers cloud API, BYOC (Bring Your Own Cloud) for VPC deployment, and BYODB options for customers who want to manage their own database.
SourceRelated pages
More on Silent Eight
Other head to heads
- Silent Eight vs NICE Actimize
- Silent Eight vs Quantexa
- Silent Eight vs ThetaRay
- Silent Eight vs Feedzai
- Silent Eight vs Jumio
- Silent Eight vs Sumsub
- Silent Eight vs iDenfy
- Silent Eight vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Silent Eight vs Sardine
- Silent Eight vs Camio
- Silent Eight vs Unit21
- Silent Eight vs Shufti Pro
- Silent Eight vs NordPass
- Silent Eight vs One Identity
- Silent Eight vs Ory Kratos
- Silent Eight vs OWASP ZAP
- Silent Eight vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Silent Eight vs Passbolt
- Silent Eight vs Lago
- Silent Eight vs Metronome
- Silent Eight vs Orb
- Silent Eight vs Polar
- Silent Eight vs Dodo Payments
- Silent Eight vs Creem
- Silent Eight vs Stampli
- Silent Eight vs Invoicera
- Silent Eight vs Zuora
- Silent Eight vs Fyle
- Silent Eight vs Maxio
- Silent Eight vs Divvy
- Silent Eight vs Tropic
- Silent Eight vs Vena Solutions
- Silent Eight vs ADP
- Silent Eight vs Avalara
- Silent Eight vs BlackLine
- Silent Eight vs Chargebee
- Stigg vs NICE Actimize
- Stigg vs Quantexa
- Stigg vs ThetaRay
- Stigg vs Feedzai
- Stigg vs Jumio
- Stigg vs Sumsub
- Stigg vs iDenfy
- Stigg vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Stigg vs Sardine
- Stigg vs Camio
- Stigg vs Unit21
- Stigg vs Shufti Pro
- Stigg vs NordPass
- Stigg vs One Identity
- Stigg vs Ory Kratos
- Stigg vs OWASP ZAP
- Stigg vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Stigg vs Passbolt
- Stigg vs Lago
- Stigg vs Metronome
- Stigg vs Orb
- Stigg vs Polar
- Stigg vs Dodo Payments
- Stigg vs Creem
- Stigg vs Stampli
- Stigg vs Invoicera
- Stigg vs Zuora
- Stigg vs Fyle
- Stigg vs Maxio
- Stigg vs Divvy
- Stigg vs Tropic
- Stigg vs Vena Solutions
- Stigg vs ADP
- Stigg vs Avalara
- Stigg vs BlackLine
- Stigg vs Chargebee

