Cybersecurity · head to head
Silent Eight vs Socket

Silent Eight
Cybersecurity
AI adjudication of sanctions screening and AML alerts
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Socket
Cybersecurity
Supply chain security platform detecting and blocking malicious dependencies
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Socket has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Silent Eight automated disposition has to clear model risk governance and a regulator, and the shadow running period before auto-close is permitted can consume most of the first year of the contract.; Socket team plan requires minimum 5-developer commitment, expensive for small teams
- They diverge on capability: Silent Eight covers Alert adjudication, Socket covers Malware detection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Silent Eight and Socket actually diverge.
| Attribute | Silent Eight | Socket |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Per-developer monthly subscription with tiered access |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Linux | Web, CLI, GitHub |
| Founded | Unknown | 2021 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Silent Eight
- Alert adjudication
- Narrative generation
- Name screening automation
- Quality assurance
- Shadow mode
- Model transparency reporting
Only in Socket
- Malware detection
- Automatic blocking
- AI behavior analysis
- Reachability analysis
- Slack integration
- SBOM support
- SAML SSO
- GitHub Actions scanning
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Silent Eight
- A bank whose level one screening team spends most of its time closing obvious false name matchesnot Socket
- A payments institution with alert volumes growing faster than it can recruit and train analystsnot Socket
- A compliance function asked by a regulator to demonstrate consistency of alert decisions across offshore teamsnot Socket
- An institution that has just tightened screening thresholds after an enforcement action and cannot staff the resulting alert increasenot Socket
Socket
- Blocking zero-day malware attacks in JavaScript dependenciesnot Silent Eight
- Managing CVE false positives with precomputed reachability analysisnot Silent Eight
- Securing Python and Go supply chains at scalenot Silent Eight
- Automating compliance requirements for regulated industriesnot Silent Eight
- Real-time threat notifications via Slack integrationnot Silent Eight
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Silent Eight
- Automated disposition has to clear model risk governance and a regulator, and the shadow running period before auto-close is permitted can consume most of the first year of the contract.
- It does not improve detection, so an institution with a poorly tuned monitoring system automates the handling of bad alerts rather than fixing why they exist.
- Pricing is tied to alert volume, which means efficiency gains elsewhere that reduce alerts also reduce the vendor bill in a way sales teams structure minimums against.
- The headcount saving is only realised if the institution actually reduces the analyst pool, and many banks redeploy rather than cut, leaving the business case unrealised on paper.
- As a mid-sized private vendor serving tier one banks, concentration risk cuts both ways; the loss of one large client materially affects the company, and buyers should ask about financial stability during diligence.
Socket
- Team plan requires minimum 5-developer commitment, expensive for small teams
- Business plan $50/dev/month becomes costly for teams exceeding 20 members
- Enterprise pricing requires custom consultation with no transparent pricing
- Free plan limited to individual developers without team collaboration
- Reachability analysis improvement (90% false positive reduction) only on Enterprise
Pricing, plan by plan
Silent Eight
On request- Iris$undefined/year
- Priced by alert volume adjudicated
- Deploys against existing screening and monitoring systems
- Shadow mode evaluation period
Socket
Free- FreeFree
- For individual developers
- Detects 70+ risk types
- Blocks malicious dependencies automatically
- Team$25/month
- Per developer on minimum 5 developers
- Precomputed reachability analysis cuts 60% false positives
- Slack alerts for threats
- Business$50/month
- Per developer on minimum 20 developers
- All Team features
- Compliance integrations with Vanta
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Function-level reachability eliminates up to 90% irrelevant CVEs
- Multi-repository system support
- Named account manager
Which should you pick?
Choose Silent Eight if
- You need alert adjudication.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want narrative generation.
Choose Socket if
- You need malware detection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI, GitHub.
- You also want automatic blocking.
Questions people ask
- Is Silent Eight or Socket better?
- Neither clearly leads. Silent Eight starts at On request and Socket at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Silent Eight or Socket?
- Socket has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Silent Eight and Free for Socket.
- Does Silent Eight or Socket run on more platforms?
- Silent Eight runs on Web, Linux. Socket runs on Web, CLI, GitHub.
- Can I use Socket for free?
- Yes. Socket has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Silent Eight starts at On request.
- What is Silent Eight best used for?
- Silent Eight is most often used for a bank whose level one screening team spends most of its time closing obvious false name matches, a payments institution with alert volumes growing faster than it can recruit and train analysts, a compliance function asked by a regulator to demonstrate consistency of alert decisions across offshore teams, an institution that has just tightened screening thresholds after an enforcement action and cannot staff the resulting alert increase. Of those, a bank whose level one screening team spends most of its time closing obvious false name matches and a payments institution with alert volumes growing faster than it can recruit and train analysts are not what Socket is typically brought in for.
- What can Silent Eight do that Socket cannot?
- Silent Eight covers Alert adjudication, Narrative generation, Name screening automation, Quality assurance. Socket covers Malware detection, Automatic blocking, AI behavior analysis, Reachability analysis.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Silent Eight: Does Silent Eight replace our screening system?
No. It consumes alerts from your existing screening and monitoring systems and decides them. The detection layer stays where it is.
Socket: How many zero-day attacks does Socket detect?
Socket detects over 100 zero-day attacks weekly across JavaScript, Python, and Go ecosystems.
SourceSilent Eight: Will a regulator accept AI closing alerts?
It depends on your jurisdiction and your model governance evidence. Banks typically run extended shadow mode first and phase auto-closure by alert type.
Socket: What is precomputed reachability analysis?
Socket's precomputed reachability analysis cuts CVE false positives by 60% automatically on Team plans, and up to 90% on Enterprise plans through function-level analysis.
SourceSilent Eight: Where is the company based?
Singapore, with offices in New York, London and Warsaw.
Socket: Is there a discount for annual billing?
Yes. Socket offers a 20% discount for annual commitments across all subscription tiers.
SourceRelated pages
More on Silent Eight
Other head to heads
- Silent Eight vs NICE Actimize
- Silent Eight vs Quantexa
- Silent Eight vs ThetaRay
- Silent Eight vs Feedzai
- Silent Eight vs Jumio
- Silent Eight vs Sumsub
- Silent Eight vs iDenfy
- Silent Eight vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Silent Eight vs Sardine
- Silent Eight vs Camio
- Silent Eight vs Unit21
- Silent Eight vs Shufti Pro
- Silent Eight vs NordPass
- Silent Eight vs One Identity
- Silent Eight vs Ory Kratos
- Silent Eight vs OWASP ZAP
- Silent Eight vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Silent Eight vs Passbolt
- Silent Eight vs Snyk
- Silent Eight vs Endor Labs
- Silent Eight vs HashiCorp Vault
- Silent Eight vs Doppler
- Silent Eight vs Chainguard
- Silent Eight vs Arnica
- Silent Eight vs Semgrep
- Silent Eight vs 1Password
- Silent Eight vs LastPass
- Silent Eight vs Bitwarden
- Silent Eight vs Akeyless
- Silent Eight vs Frontegg
- Silent Eight vs Ping Identity
- Silent Eight vs Proofpoint
- Silent Eight vs Qualys VMDR
- Silent Eight vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Silent Eight vs Recorded Future
- Silent Eight vs RoboForm
- Socket vs NICE Actimize
- Socket vs Quantexa
- Socket vs ThetaRay
- Socket vs Feedzai
- Socket vs Jumio
- Socket vs Sumsub
- Socket vs iDenfy
- Socket vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Socket vs Sardine
- Socket vs Camio
- Socket vs Unit21
- Socket vs Shufti Pro
- Socket vs NordPass
- Socket vs One Identity
- Socket vs Ory Kratos
- Socket vs OWASP ZAP
- Socket vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Socket vs Passbolt
- Socket vs Snyk
- Socket vs Endor Labs
- Socket vs HashiCorp Vault
- Socket vs Doppler
- Socket vs Chainguard
- Socket vs Arnica
- Socket vs Semgrep
- Socket vs 1Password
- Socket vs LastPass
- Socket vs Bitwarden
- Socket vs Akeyless
- Socket vs Frontegg
- Socket vs Ping Identity
- Socket vs Proofpoint
- Socket vs Qualys VMDR
- Socket vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Socket vs Recorded Future
- Socket vs RoboForm
