Softwr

Software · head to head

RPMGlobal XPAC vs Enablon EHS

RPMGlobal XPAC logo

RPMGlobal XPAC

Software

Production scheduling and planning optimization

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Enablon EHS logo

Enablon EHS

Software

Environmental health and safety management

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: RPMGlobal XPAC rPMGlobal publishes no price, no licence model and no purchase route for XPAC; the software pages carry no cost information at all; Enablon EHS uK Find a Tender award notice records Enablon SAS awarded a 5 year contract by Cadent Gas Limited for its EHS management solution valued at £1,275,353.62 excluding VAT (£1,530,424.34 including VAT); this is a contract value, not a price list
  • They diverge on capability: RPMGlobal XPAC covers Production scheduling, Enablon EHS covers Incident management.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which RPMGlobal XPAC and Enablon EHS actually diverge.

Attributes where RPMGlobal XPAC and Enablon EHS differ
AttributeRPMGlobal XPACEnablon EHS
PlatformsWindows, WebWeb, Windows, Ios, Android

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown), founded (1995).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in RPMGlobal XPAC

  • Production scheduling
  • Resource allocation
  • Constraint optimization
  • Multi-scenario planning
  • Real-time updates
  • Vulcan
  • MineSched
  • Whittle

Only in Enablon EHS

  • Incident management
  • Health and safety compliance
  • Environmental management
  • Risk assessment
  • Audit management
  • SAP
  • Oracle
  • Salesforce

Both cover

  • Windows support
  • Web support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

RPMGlobal XPAC

  • Midterm and strategic mine production schedulingnot Enablon EHS
  • Building life of mine schedules from geological and mine design datanot Enablon EHS
  • Comparing scheduling scenarios for open cut and underground operationsnot Enablon EHS

Enablon EHS

  • Health and safety managementnot RPMGlobal XPAC
  • Incident reportingnot RPMGlobal XPAC
  • Risk assessmentnot RPMGlobal XPAC
  • Compliance trackingnot RPMGlobal XPAC
  • Audit managementnot RPMGlobal XPAC

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

RPMGlobal XPAC

  • RPMGlobal publishes no price, no licence model and no purchase route for XPAC; the software pages carry no cost information at all
  • XPAC is one of roughly 40 separate RPMGlobal products, so scheduling, simulation and asset management are separate purchases
  • Obtaining any pricing requires contacting the vendor through a contact or support form

Enablon EHS

  • UK Find a Tender award notice records Enablon SAS awarded a 5 year contract by Cadent Gas Limited for its EHS management solution valued at £1,275,353.62 excluding VAT (£1,530,424.34 including VAT); this is a contract value, not a price list

Pricing, plan by plan

RPMGlobal XPAC

On request
  • XPAC Standard$21000/year
    • Production scheduling
    • Resource optimization
    • Constraint management

Enablon EHS

On request
  • Enablon EHS$25000/year
    • Health and safety management
    • Incident reporting
    • Compliance tracking
  • Enablon Enterprise$60000/year
    • Advanced features
    • Multi-site management
    • Custom workflows

Which should you pick?

Choose RPMGlobal XPAC if

  • You need production scheduling.
  • You work on Windows, Web.
  • You also want resource allocation.
RPMGlobal XPAC review

Choose Enablon EHS if

  • You need incident management.
  • You work on Web, Windows, Ios, Android.
  • You also want health and safety compliance.
Enablon EHS review

Questions people ask

Is RPMGlobal XPAC or Enablon EHS better?
Neither clearly leads. RPMGlobal XPAC starts at On request and Enablon EHS at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, RPMGlobal XPAC or Enablon EHS?
RPMGlobal XPAC starts at On request and Enablon EHS at On request.
Does RPMGlobal XPAC or Enablon EHS run on more platforms?
RPMGlobal XPAC runs on Windows, Web. Enablon EHS runs on Web, Windows, Ios, Android.
What is RPMGlobal XPAC best used for?
RPMGlobal XPAC is most often used for midterm and strategic mine production scheduling, building life of mine schedules from geological and mine design data, comparing scheduling scenarios for open cut and underground operations. Of those, midterm and strategic mine production scheduling and building life of mine schedules from geological and mine design data are not what Enablon EHS is typically brought in for.
What can RPMGlobal XPAC do that Enablon EHS cannot?
RPMGlobal XPAC covers Production scheduling, Resource allocation, Constraint optimization, Multi-scenario planning. Enablon EHS covers Incident management, Health and safety compliance, Environmental management, Risk assessment. Both handle Windows support, Web support.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on RPMGlobal XPAC

More on Enablon EHS

Keep looking

Other head to heads