Softwr

Fitness · head to head

RP Diet vs Spiideo

RP Diet logo

RP Diet

Fitness

Science-based diet coaching

From
$14.99/month
Rated
-
Spiideo logo

Spiideo

Sports

Permanently installed multi-camera capture for venues, with automated production and analysis on top

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: RP Diet requires users to commit to detailed macro tracking, which is time-consuming for some athletes; Spiideo it requires permanent installation with mounting rights, power and network at the venue, so clubs that rent pitches or play at council grounds cannot buy it at all.
  • They diverge on capability: RP Diet covers Personalized meal plans, Spiideo covers Fixed multi-camera arrays.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which RP Diet and Spiideo actually diverge.

Attributes where RP Diet and Spiideo differ
AttributeRP DietSpiideo
Starting price$14.99/monthOn request
Pricing modelsubscriptionquote
PlatformsiOS, AndroidWeb, iOS, Android
CategoryFitnessSports
Founded2012Unknown

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in RP Diet

  • Personalized meal plans
  • Adaptive diet coaching
  • Training day adjustments
  • Body weight tracking
  • Weekly check-ins
  • Apple Health
  • Ios support
  • Android support

Only in Spiideo

  • Fixed multi-camera arrays
  • Automated production
  • Any-angle review
  • Live streaming
  • Positional data
  • Multi-team access

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

RP Diet

  • Workout trackingnot Spiideo
  • Nutrition managementnot Spiideo
  • Health monitoringnot Spiideo
  • Fitness coachingnot Spiideo
  • Wellness improvementnot Spiideo

Spiideo

  • A facility with several pitches wanting every team covered without anyone carrying a cameranot RP Diet
  • A federation or league standardising streaming and analysis across member venuesnot RP Diet
  • A university or academy filming many age groups and sessions every weeknot RP Diet
  • An indoor arena needing multi-angle review for sports where a single wide camera is not enoughnot RP Diet

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

RP Diet

  • Requires users to commit to detailed macro tracking, which is time-consuming for some athletes
  • Limited meal delivery partnerships compared to competitors

Spiideo

  • It requires permanent installation with mounting rights, power and network at the venue, so clubs that rent pitches or play at council grounds cannot buy it at all.
  • Coverage stops at the property line, so away fixtures and tournaments at other venues produce nothing and analysis is one-sided across a season.
  • The purchase is capital plus subscription, and the party paying for installation is often the facility owner while the benefit accrues to the teams, which makes the internal business case awkward.
  • Live production quality is limited by the venue internet uplink, and many amateur grounds have upload bandwidth that will not carry a reliable stream.
  • Publicly streaming matches involving minors creates consent, image rights and retention obligations for the venue operator, and these rarely appear in the software procurement process.

Pricing, plan by plan

RP Diet

$14.99/month
  • Monthly$14.99/month
    • Personalized plans
    • Meal timing
    • Adaptive coaching
  • Annual$119.99/year
    • Personalized plans
    • Meal timing
    • Adaptive coaching

Spiideo

On request
  • Spiideo$undefined/year
    • Installation and hardware quoted per venue
    • Annual subscription per venue or per team
    • Streaming and analysis licensed separately

Which should you pick?

Choose RP Diet if

  • You need personalized meal plans.
  • You work on iOS, Android.
  • You also want adaptive diet coaching.

Choose Spiideo if

  • You need fixed multi-camera arrays.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want automated production.

Questions people ask

Is RP Diet or Spiideo better?
Neither clearly leads. RP Diet starts at $14.99/month and Spiideo at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, RP Diet or Spiideo?
RP Diet starts at $14.99/month and Spiideo at On request.
Does RP Diet or Spiideo run on more platforms?
RP Diet runs on iOS, Android. Spiideo runs on Web, iOS, Android.
What is RP Diet best used for?
RP Diet is most often used for workout tracking, nutrition management, health monitoring, fitness coaching. Of those, workout tracking and nutrition management are not what Spiideo is typically brought in for.
What can RP Diet do that Spiideo cannot?
RP Diet covers Personalized meal plans, Adaptive diet coaching, Training day adjustments, Body weight tracking. Spiideo covers Fixed multi-camera arrays, Automated production, Any-angle review, Live streaming.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

RP Diet: What does the RP Diet app cost?

The RP Diet app costs $14.99 per month and provides personalized macro targets, meal plans, and nutrition guidance based on Renaissance Periodization's science-based approach.

Source
Spiideo: Can I move the cameras between venues?

No. The system is installed and calibrated for a specific site. If you need portable capture, this is the wrong category of product.

RP Diet: Does RP Diet integrate with training programs?

Yes. RP Diet is designed to integrate with training phases, adjusting calorie and macro targets as training variables change throughout a structured calendar.

Source
Spiideo: Is this a replacement for a video tagging tool?

Not entirely. It creates and streams footage and offers review; clubs with an established tagging workflow often keep it and use Spiideo as the capture layer.

Spiideo: Who normally pays for it?

Usually the venue or federation rather than an individual team, because the cost is site infrastructure and the benefit is shared across every team using the pitch.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads