Automation Integration · head to head
Relevance AI vs Tines

Relevance AI
Automation Integration
Specialist AI Agents for Every Task
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Tines has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Relevance AI no published standard pricing tiers or plans; Tines no-code, UI-driven approach is restrictive for complex logic and version control integration with SDLC
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Relevance AI and Tines actually diverge.
| Attribute | Relevance AI | Tines |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | usage-based | Unknown |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Founded | Unknown | 2018 |
Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Relevance AI
Nothing recorded that Tines does not also cover.
Only in Tines
- Story builder
- Drag-and-drop workflows
- Event triggers
- Incident response automation
- Threat intelligence
- Case management
- Alert triage
- Slack
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Relevance AI
- AI agent platform for automating business processes with LLMsnot Tines
- Low-code automation and workflow orchestration using language modelsnot Tines
Tines
- Workflow Automationnot Relevance AI
- Data Integrationnot Relevance AI
- Process Automationnot Relevance AI
- App Integrationnot Relevance AI
- API Connectivitynot Relevance AI
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Relevance AI
- No published standard pricing tiers or plans
- Pay-per-task model pricing varies significantly by AI model selection
- Enterprise quotes require direct contact with sales
- Task costs range from 0.01 to 0.11 USD depending on model used
Tines
- No-code, UI-driven approach is restrictive for complex logic and version control integration with SDLC
- No native log intelligence layer to validate data completeness
- Limited scope to security workloads, cannot handle general business automation
- Governance features lag behind EU AI Act compliance requirements
Pricing, plan by plan
Relevance AI
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Relevance AI review.
Tines
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Tines review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Relevance AI if
Nothing in the data separates Relevance AI from Tines on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose Tines if
- You need story builder.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want drag-and-drop workflows.
Questions people ask
- Is Relevance AI or Tines better?
- Neither clearly leads. Relevance AI starts at On request and Tines at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Relevance AI or Tines?
- Tines has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Relevance AI and Free for Tines.
- Does Relevance AI or Tines run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Tines for free?
- Yes. Tines has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Relevance AI starts at On request.
- What is Relevance AI best used for?
- Relevance AI is most often used for ai agent platform for automating business processes with llms, low-code automation and workflow orchestration using language models. Of those, ai agent platform for automating business processes with llms and low-code automation and workflow orchestration using language models are not what Tines is typically brought in for.
- What can Relevance AI do that Tines cannot?
- Tines covers Story builder, Drag-and-drop workflows, Event triggers, Incident response automation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Relevance AI: What is Relevance AI's pricing model?
Relevance AI uses a pay-per-task model where costs vary by AI model selected. Average cost per task is approximately 0.09 USD, with actual costs ranging from 0.01 to 0.11 USD depending on which model the system routes to. The platform automatically selects the lowest-cost model that meets performance requirements.
SourceTines: What are Tines' pricing tiers?
Tines offers a free Community Edition for evaluation, Starter Edition at $500/month with annual billing, and Business/Enterprise tiers starting around $50,000/year for small security teams and scaling to $200,000+ for large SOCs.
SourceRelevance AI: How much do Relevance AI tasks cost?
Task costs depend on model selection. Example usage shows customers spending 11800 USD monthly while processing 1.24 million tasks. For enterprise custom pricing, users must book a demo or contact the sales team.
SourceTines: What is the Community Edition limited to?
As of July 2026, the free Community Edition is scoped to 1 builder and 3 flows as an evaluation tool to test Tines' capabilities.
SourceTines: Is Tines limited to security automation?
Yes, Tines is purpose-built for security automation. Teams needing non-security automation on the same orchestration layer would need to evaluate alternatives.
SourceTines: Does Tines have native log intelligence capabilities?
No, Tines lacks a native log intelligence layer, meaning it cannot determine whether the data feeding your detection tools is complete. Teams must build automation against whatever alerts their existing infrastructure provides.
SourceRelated pages
More on Relevance AI
Other head to heads
- Relevance AI vs n8n
- Relevance AI vs Zapier
- Relevance AI vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Relevance AI vs MuleSoft
- Relevance AI vs Dagster
- Relevance AI vs Inngest
- Relevance AI vs CrewAI
- Relevance AI vs Autonoly
- Relevance AI vs Flowise
- Relevance AI vs Hatchet
- Relevance AI vs Trigger.dev
- Relevance AI vs Temporal
- Relevance AI vs Browserbase
- Relevance AI vs Camunda
- Relevance AI vs Census
- Relevance AI vs Decodable
- Relevance AI vs Dify
- Relevance AI vs Flowable
- Relevance AI vs Parabola
- Relevance AI vs Jitterbit
- Relevance AI vs Automation Anywhere
- Relevance AI vs Nintex
- Relevance AI vs Automate.io
- Relevance AI vs Polytomic
- Relevance AI vs Mage AI
- Relevance AI vs mParticle
- Relevance AI vs UiPath
- Relevance AI vs Alloy Automation
- Relevance AI vs Celigo
- Relevance AI vs Salesforce Flows
- Tines vs n8n
- Tines vs Zapier
- Tines vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Tines vs MuleSoft
- Tines vs Dagster
- Tines vs Inngest
- Tines vs CrewAI
- Tines vs Autonoly
- Tines vs Flowise
- Tines vs Hatchet
- Tines vs Trigger.dev
- Tines vs Temporal
- Tines vs Browserbase
- Tines vs Camunda
- Tines vs Census
- Tines vs Decodable
- Tines vs Dify
- Tines vs Flowable
- Tines vs Parabola
- Tines vs Jitterbit
- Tines vs Automation Anywhere
- Tines vs Nintex
- Tines vs Automate.io
- Tines vs Polytomic
- Tines vs Mage AI
- Tines vs mParticle
- Tines vs UiPath
- Tines vs Alloy Automation
- Tines vs Celigo
- Tines vs Salesforce Flows

